Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2019 | 3 | 31-50

Article title

The day-of-the-week effect on the example of 82 cryptocurrencies

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

Abstracts

EN
The problem of the effectiveness of financial markets has been the subject of interest of scientists for many years. Recently, along with the development of the cryptocurrency market, research on the effectiveness of this fragment of the financial market has begun. In the article, the occurrence of the day of the week was analyzed on the example of logarithmic rates of return of 82 cryptocurrencies vs. USD. Not only Close-Close return rates were analyzed, but also Overnight, Open-Open and Open-Close. The distribution of logarithmic rates of return was not normal for most of the cryptocurrencies analyzed. That why in the statistical analysis the Kruskal-Wallis parametric test was implemented. For individual cryptocurrencies, the occurrence of inefficiency was found for different days of the week and different types of return rates (C-C, Ov, O-C and O-O). The largest number of rejections of the null hypothesis took place for the following cryptocurrencies (the least effective cryptocurrencies): Aelf, Aeternity and Aion. No example of ineffectiveness was discovered in the case of cryptocurrencies:Ark, Basic Attention, Bitcoin, Bitcoin Gold, Cindicator, Dash, Denta Coin, Digixdao, Dogecoin, Electroneum, Enigma, EOS, Ethereum, Gas, Gnosis, Golem, Kucoin, Kyber Network, Lisk, Litecoin, Maidsafecoin, Monacoin, Neblio, OmiseGo, Tron, Wax.

Year

Issue

3

Pages

31-50

Physical description

Dates

published
2019

Contributors

  • Warsaw School of Economics
  • Warsaw School of Economics

References

  • Aggarwal D., Do Bitcoins follow a random walk model?, “Research in Economics”, Vol. 73, 2019, pp. 15-22.
  • Aggarval R., Rivoli P., Seasonal and day-of-the week effects in four emerging stock markets, “Financial Review”, Vol. 24, 1989, pp. 541-550.
  • Agrawal A., Tandon K., Anomalies or illusions?: Evidence from stock markets in eighteen countries, “Journal of International Money and Finance”, Vol. 13, 1994, pp. 83-106.
  • Ahron D., Quadan M., Bitcoin and the day-of-the-week effect, “Finance Research Letters”, 2018, 10.1016/j.frl.2018.12.004.
  • Barone E., The Italian stock market: Efficiency and calendar anomalies, “Journal of Banking and Finance”, Vol. 14, 1990, pp. 493-510.
  • Bariviera A., Basgall M., Hasperue W., Naiouf M., Some stylized facts of the Bitcoin market, “Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications”, Vol. 494, 2017, pp. 82-90.
  • Bartels R., The rank version of von Neumann’s ratio test for randomness, “Journal of the American Statistical Association”, Vol. 77, 1982, pp. 40-46.
  • Boudreaux D., The monthly effect in international stock markets: evidence and implications, “Journal of Financial and Strategic Decisions”, Vol. 8, 1/1995, pp. 15-20.
  • Brock W., Scheinkman J., Dechert W., LeBaron B., A test for independence based on the correlation dimension, “Econometric Reviews”, Vol. 15, 1996, pp. 197-235.
  • Caporale G., Gil-Alana L., Plastun A., Persistence in the cryptocurrency market, “Research in International Business and Finance”, Vol. 46, 2018, pp. 141-148.
  • Caporale G., Plastun A., The day of the week effect in the cryptocurrency market, “Finance Research Letters”, Vol. 31, 2019, 258-269.
  • Decourt F., Chohan U., Perugini M., Bitcoin returns and the Monday effect, “Horizontales Empresariales”, Vol. 16, 2017, 4-14.
  • Durai S., Paul S., Calendar anomaly and the degree of market inefficiency of Bitcoin, Madras School of Economic Working Paper No. 168/2018, pp. 8-12.
  • Fama E., Efficient capital markets; a review of theory and empirical work, “Journal of Finance”, Vol. 25, 1970, pp. 383-417.
  • Gu A., The declining January effect: Evidence from U.S. equity markets, “Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance”, Vol. 43, 2003, pp. 395-404
  • Hurst H., Long-term storage capacity of reservoirs. “Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers”, Vol. 116, 1951, pp. 770-799.
  • Kaiser L., Seasonality in cryptocurrencies, “Finance Research Letters”, Vol. 31, 2019, pp. 232-238.
  • Kato K., Schwarz S. Ziemba W., Day of the weekend effects in Japanese stocks, “Japanese Capital Markets”, Ballinger, New York 1990. Kim J., Automatic variance ratio test under conditional heteroscedasticity, “Finance Research Letters”, Vol. 6, 2009, pp. 179-185.
  • Kurihara Y., Fukushima A., The market efficiency on Bitcoin: a weekly anomaly perspective, “Journal of Applied Finance & Banking”, Vol. 7, 3/2017, 57-64.
  • Latif M. Arshad S., Fatima M., Rarooq S., Market efficiency, market anomalies, causes, Evidences and some behavioral aspects of market anomalies, Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, Vol. 2, 9-10/2011, pp. 1-14.
  • Lo A., MacKinlay C., Stock market process do not follow random walks: evidence form a simple specification test, “Review of Financial Studies”, Vol. 1, 1988, pp. 41-66. Mbanga C.,
  • The day-of-the-week patterns of price clustering in Bitcoin, “Applied Letters”, Vol. 10, 26/2019, 807-811.
  • Nadarajah S., Chu J., On the efficiency of Bitcoin, “Economics Letters”, Vol. 160, 2017, pp. 6-9.
  • Schwert W., Anomalies and market efficiency, “Simon School of Business Working Paper” no. FR 02-13, 2002, pp. 1-15.
  • Smirlock M., Starks M., Day-of-the-week and intraday effects in stock returns, “Journal of Financial Economics”, Vol. 17, 1986, 197-210.
  • Sutheebanjard P., Premchaiswadi W., Analysis of calendar effects: Day-of-the-week effect on the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET), “International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance”, Vol. 1, 2010, pp. 2010-2023.
  • Urquhart A., The inefficiency of Bitcoin, “Economics Letters”, Vol. 148, 2016, pp. 80-82.
  • Yaya O., Ogbonna A., Do we expect day-of-the-week effect in returns and volatility of cryptocurrency?, MPRA Paper No. 91429, 2019, pp. 1-8.
  • Vargha A., Delaney H. (1998), Kruskal-Wallis test and stochastic homogeneity, “Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics”, Vol. 23, 2/1998, pp. 170192.
  • Wald A., Wolfowitz J., On a test whether two samples are from the same population. “Annals of Mathematical Statistics”, Vol. 11, 1940, pp. 147-162.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
2077401

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-issn-2084-1361-year-2019-issue-3-article-df281222-63ea-385f-a265-72dc5dc83783
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.