Political Imagination – Contributions to a Christian Vision of Politics

• Authors: Matyas Szalay
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: On the one hand, contem­porary politics is so overwhelmed by imagination that there is a risk for politics to be dissolved into mere crea­tive communication. On the other hand, in an age when politics is reduced to simple administration, there is little room for imagination and the new possibilities it brings. By illuminating the ambiguous nature of the imaginative act I would like to show how a Christian vision of politics may help to understand both sides of this paradox. THE RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: There are two radically distinct ways to carry out imagi­nation depending on the subject’s fundamental attitude. Thus I will elaborate through a phenomenological analysis how this difference is present in all dimension of political imagination concerning the following essential criteria: a) the focus on the intentional object, b) methodology, c) temporal structure. THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: If the act of fantasy is really that negative in all these aspects why do philosophers prefer it to the act of imagination? I argue that historically speaking the pivotal point is the Kantian philosophy and it is the Kantian heritage that influenced Feuerbach to lay the new fundaments of political fantasy. RESEARCH RESULTS: Through interpreting a crucial passage of Feuer­bach’s The Essence of Christianity I show that the way Kant and Feuerbach trans­formed the concept of a receptive and obedient imagination focused on the Christian mystery are fatal for political philosophy. CONCLUSIONS, INNOVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: I insist that contemporary Christian politics is once again on a cross‑road, either it remains captivated by fantasy or it gets liberated by becoming true imagina­tion. Imagination is centered on the mystery that illuminates the whole sphere of politics in all of its horizontal and vertical dimensions and thus allows for a radically new beginning of political reflection.

Keywords

EN

Imagination; Fantasy; Politics; phenomenology; eschatology

• Publisher: Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
• Journal: Horyzonty Polityki
• Year: 2016
• Volume: 7
• Issue: 19
• Pages: 35-56

Dates

published

2016-12-21

Contributors

author

Matyas Szalay

References

• Aquinas, T. (2012). Summa theologica. Authentic Media Inc.
• Augustine, S., & Zycha, J. (1894). De Genesi ad litteram inperfectus liber (Vol. 28). F. Tempsky.
• Bottici, C. (2014). Imaginal politics: images beyond imagination and the imaginary. Columbia University Press.
• Bundy, M.W. (1927). The Theory of Imagination in Classical and Medieval Thought. University of Illinois Studios, Vol. 12, 18.
• Chrétien, J.L. (1991). L’inoubliable et l’inespéré – Euriditio didascalia (Didascalicon), I. book, ch. X and XII, Migne, Patrologia Latina, tom. 176, col. pp. 747 748 and 760.
• Feuerbach, L. (1881). The Essence of Christianity, translated from the second German edition by Marian Evans. London. Retrived from: http://www. archive.org/stream/essencechristia00feuegoog#page/n180/mode/2up, (access: 13.11. 2013).
• Grotius, H. (1625). De Jure belli ac pacis. In: De Iure praedae y De Iure belli ac pacis, Edición bilingüe, traducción y notas de Primitivo Mariño Gómez (Madrid, Centro de Estudios Constitucionales 1987).
• Hamilton, E., & Cairns, H. (1961). Plato: The collected dialogues.
• Horner, R. (2001). Rethinking God as gift: Marion, Derrida, and the limits of phenomenology (No. 19). Fordham University Press.
• Kant, I. (1880). Träume eines Geistersehers: erläutert durch Träume der Metaphysik (Vol. 1320). P. Reclam jun.
• Kant, I., & Guyer, P. (1998). Critique of pure reason.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• ---
• Kearney, R. (2002). The wake of imagination. Routledge.
• Marion, J.L. (1999). Sketch of a Phenomenological Concept of Gift. Postmodern Philosophy and Christian Thought, 122 143.
• Milbank, J. (1995). Can a gift be given? Prolegomena to a future trinitarian metaphysic. Modern Theology, 11(1), 119 161.
• Pfänder, A. (1933). Die Seele des Menschen: Versuch einer verstehenden Psychologie (Vol. 2). Max Niemeyer Verlag.
• Plotinus. (1969). Plotinus the Enneads, ed. S. MacKenna. Faber & Faber.
• Pope Benedict XVI in his Plenary Assembly of the Pontifical of Culture (8 3 2008). Retrived from: https://w2.vatican.va/content/benedict xvi/ en/speeches/2008/march/documents/hf_ben xvi_spe_20080308_pc cultura.html).
• Sancto Victore de R., De gratia contemplationis seu Benjamin major, Migne, Patrologia Latina tom. 196, col. 70 72, I. Book, ch. VI.
• Scull, C., & Hammond, W.G. (2006). The JRR Tolkien companion & guide. London: HarperCollins.
• Tolkien, J.R.R. (1997). The Monsters and the Critics and other Essays, ed. C. Tolkien. London: HarperCollins, 72.
• von Schlegel, F. (1971). Friedrich Schlegel’s Lucinde and the fragments. Uni¬versity of Minnesota Press.