Kontrowersje wokół analizy dyskursu

• Authors: Wolfgang Heinemann , Zofia Bilut-Homplewicz , Marta Smykała

Title variants

EN

Controversies around Discourse Analysis

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

EN

The starting point o f this contribution is the assumption that there is an overall uncertainty about the use o f the term discourse in various disciplines. The author presents different ways of understanding discourse in philosophy (primarily by Habermas and Foucault). The core part of the paper discusses the heterogeneous linguistic concepts of discourse, starting from the idea o f discourse as a simple conversation through Critical DiscourseAnalysis and institutionalised interai rons up to textology-based concept of discourse. Particular attention is devoted to the use o f the notion o f discourse in sociology (and its related disciplines such as historiography, political science and media stuaies). When describing the concepts o f discourse in various disciplines the author draws attention to the vaned methods o f discourse analysis applied there, including the universal model byWamke/Spitzmiiller. The finał section identifies and critically discusses problem areas in discourse studies. The paper also postulates that the current the fascination with Foucault should be abandoned wlien circumscribing the scope of discourse studies in favour of strwing for pragmatic and communicative adeąuacy.

Keywords

EN

discourse; discourse analysis; discourse in various disciplines

• Publisher: Instytut Polonistyki i Kulturoznawstwa Uniwersytetu Opolskiego
• Journal: Stylistyka
• Year: 2012
• Volume: 21
• Pages: 287-318

Dates

published

2020-12-12

Contributors

author

Wolfgang Heinemann

author

Zofia Bilut-Homplewicz

author

Marta Smykała