Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


Journal

2013 | 41/2 | 149-167

Article title

STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF CONTENT AND LANGUAGE INTEGRATED LEARNING AT SELECTED TECHNICAL UNIVERSITIES IN POLAND

Content

Title variants

PL
STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF CONTENT AND LANGUAGE INTEGRATED LEARNING AT SELECTED TECHNICAL UNIVERSITIES IN POLAND

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

PL
The present article is an attempt to present the situation in the area of Content and Language Integrated Learning at some technical universities in Poland. It starts with a brief outline of CLIL methodology as well as its status in the context of Polish tertiary education, and then moves on to a discussion of the results of the study conducted among Polish and international students attending English-medium courses in their specialist areas, such as, for instance, engineering. The courses involve learning of new, difficult concepts as well as specialized vocabulary. The study took place in three universities which have been offering content instruction in English for a number of years. Its aim was to investigate problems and difficulties that students come across during the course of their studies in a foreign language, as well as their expectations concerning such a mode of education.

Journal

Year

Issue

Pages

149-167

Physical description

Dates

published
2020-02-17

Contributors

  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza, Poznań
  • Politechnika Poznańska, Poznań

References

  • CLIL Matrix. 2004-2007. Achieving good practice in Content and Language Integrated Learning/bilingual education. http://www.ecml.at/mtp2/clilmatrix/EN/qMain.html CLIL Matrix [DW 30.10.2012]
  • Council of Europe. 2001. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: learning, teaching, assessment. http://europass.cedefop.europa.eu/en/resources/european-language-levels-cefr [DW 30.10.2012].
  • Coyle, D., Hood, Ph., Marsh, D. 2010. Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Crandall, J. 1998. “Collaborate and cooperate: teacher education for integrating language and content instruction”. English Teaching Forum 36/1: 2-9.
  • Eurydice Report. 2006. CLIL at school in Europe. Brussels: Eurydice. http://www.eurydice.org [DW 10.11.2013].
  • Gierlinger, E. 2012. “CLIL-ing me softly”. English Teaching Professional 82, September: 12-14.
  • Graddol, D. 2006. English Next. Plymouth: British Council
  • Key Competences for Lifelong Learning: European Reference Framework. 2007. 4. http://eur-lex.europa.eu [DW 30.10.2012].
  • Komorowska, H. (red.). 2011. Issues in Promoting Multilingualism. Teaching – Learning – Assessment. Warsaw: Foundation for the Development of the Education System.
  • Larsen-Freeman, D. 2000. Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching. (2nd edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Łuczak, A. 2011. “ESP courses at universities. Preparing students for the challenges in the European markets” (w) Issues in Promoting Multilingualism. Teaching – Learning – Assessment (red. H. Komorowska). Warsaw: Foundation for the Development of the Education System. 59-77.
  • Mehisto, P., Marsh, D., Frigols, M. 2012. Uncovering CLIL. Content and Language Inte-grated Learning in Bilingual and Multilingual Education. London: Macmillan Publishers Limited.
  • Richards, J.C., Rodgers, T.S. 2001. Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ruiz de Zarobe, Y., Sierra, J.M., Gallardo, F. 2011. Content and Foreign Language Integrated Learning: Contributions to Multilingualism in European Contexts, Bern: Peter Lang.
  • Stoller, F.L. 1997. “Project work: a means to promote language content”. English Teaching Forum 35/4: 2-9.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-issn-2545-3971-year-2013-issue-41_2-article-21795
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.