Udržitelné nebo chytré město?

• Authors: Hák Tomáš , Janoušková Svatava , Moldan Bedřich

Title variants

EN

A sustainable city or a smart city?

• Languages of publication: CS

Abstracts

CS

V současné době ve světě existuje velké, až nepřehledné množství regionálních a lokálních rozvojových koncepcí a strategií. Ty bývají založeny na teoretických, koncepčních i pragmatických rámcích, obsahují různé nástroje a indikátory a svou realizací usilují o přispění k udržitelnosti rozvoje na dané úrovni. Z rozsáhlé rešerše vyplývá, že za hlavní dva koncepty rozvoje komunit (obcí, měst a regionů) jsou považována udržitelná a chytrá města, která mají řadu podobných i odlišných charakteristik. Autoři provedli srovnávací analýzu vybraných nástrojů pro udržitelná a chytrá města – metodik pro realizaci a hodnocení. Výsledky ukazují, že je možné dosáhnout synergického efektu, tj. posilování pozitivních přínosů obou iniciativ. I když vývoj nelze s jistotou predikovat, vedle paralelního rozvoje obou iniciativ si lze představit i definování konceptu nového, resp. synergické propojení obou konceptů, které se ve vědeckém, korporátním i politickém světě již objevuje – „chytrá udržitelná města“ (Smart Sustainable Cities).

EN

These days there are so many regional and local development concepts and strategies that the situation verges on chaos. They are based on theoretical, conceptual and pragmatic frameworks, contain miscellaneous tools and indicators and strive to contribute to the sustainability of development on various levels. Extensive research has shown that two concepts for the development of communities (towns, cities and regions) are considered dominant: sustainable cities and smart cities. The two concepts share certain characteristics and differ in others. The authors of this article have carried out a comparative analysis of selected tools for both concepts. The results of the analysis of methodologies for implementation and evaluation show that a synergic effect in terms of strengthened benefits delivered by both initiatives is achievable. Although the prospective developments are hard to predict, yet another concept – or rather a synergic interconnection of those mentioned – seems feasible. In fact, the notion of smart sustainable cities has already appeared in the scientific, corporate and political world besides the concurrent development of both initiatives.

Keywords

CS

udržitelný rozvoj; udržitelné město; chytré město; indikátory

EN

sustainable development; sustainable city; smart city; indicators

• Publisher: Ministerstvo pro místní rozvoj ČR. Ústav územního rozvoje
• Journal: Urbanismus a územní rozvoj
• Year: 2018
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 14-25

Contributors

author

Hák Tomáš

• Charles University Environment centre

author

Janoušková Svatava

• Charles University Environment centre

author

Moldan Bedřich

• Charles University Environment centre

References

• HABITAT, UN. Istanbul Declaration on Human Settlements. In: UN Doc. A/Conf. 1996.
• AHVENNIEMI, Hannele et al. What are the differences between sustainable and smart cities? Cities, 2017, 60: 234–245.
• ANTHOPOULOS, Leonidas. Smart utopia vs smart reality: Learning by experience from 10 smart city cases. Cities, 2017, 63: 128–148.
• BANERJEE, Subhabrata Bobby. Who sustains whose development? Sustainable development and the reinvention of nature. Organization studies, 2003, 24.1: 143–180.
• BÁRTA, David et al. Metodika Konceptu inteligentních měst. Brno: CDV, 2015.
• BIBRI, Simon Elias; KROGSTIE, John. Smart sustainable cities of the future: An extensive interdisciplinary literature review. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2017.
• CERRUDO, Cesar. An emerging us (and world) threat: Cities wide open to cyber attacks. Securing Smart Cities, 2015.
• DAMERI, Renata Paola. Searching for smart city definition: a comprehensive proposal. International Journal of Computers & Technology, 2013, 11.5: 2544–2551.
• DE JONG, Martin et al. Sustainable–smart–resilient–low carbon–eco–knowledge cities; making sense of a multitude of concepts promoting sustainable urbanization. Journal of Cleaner production, 2015, 109: 25–38.
• DEVUYST, Dimitri – HENS, Luc – DE LANNOY, Walter (ed.). How green is the city? Sustainability assessment and the management of urban environments. Columbia University Press, 2001.
• DIRKS, Susanne – KEELING, Mary. A vision of smarter cities: How cities can lead the way into a prosperous and sustainable future. IBM Institute for business Value, 2009, 8.
• DODDS, Felix – SCHNEEBERGER, Kirsty; ULLAH, Farooq. Review of implementation of Agenda 21 and the Rio principles. New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2012.
• EGGER, Steve. Determining a sustainable city model. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2006, 21.9: 1235–1246.
• EK. Inteligentní města a obce – evropské inovační partnerství. Sdělení Komise C (2012) 4701 final. Luxemburg: European Commission, 2012.
• FIKSEL, Joseph R. – EASON, Tarsha – FREDERICKSON, Herbert. A framework for sustainability indicators at EPA. National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, 2012.
• FU, Yang – ZHANG, Xiaoling. Trajectory of urban sustainability concepts: A 35-year bibliometric analysis. Cities, 2017, 60: 113–123.
• Global Smart City and Community Coalition [online]. GS3C, 2017 [vid. 29.10.2017]. Dostupné z https://gsc3.city/.
• GREENFIELD, Adam. Against the smart city. Do, 2013.
• GREENHOUSE GAS PROTOCOL. Countries and Cities [on-line]. WRI a WBCSD, 2017 [cit. 25.10.2017]. Dostupné z: http://www.ghgprotocol.org/countries-and-cities.
• GRIGGS, Steven et al. Characterizing and evaluating rival discourses of the ‘sustainable city’: Towards a politics of pragmatic adversarialism. Political Geography, 2017, 59: 36–46.
• GUARDIAN. The truth about smart cities: In the end, they will destroy democracy [online]. Guardian, 2014 [vid. 29.10.2017]. Dostupné z: https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2014/dec/17/truth-smart-city-destroy-democracy-urban-thinkers-buzzphrase.
• HÁK, Tomáš – JANOUŠKOVÁ, Svatava – MOLDAN, Bedřich. Analýza přístupů municipalit k plánování a hodnocení udržitelného rozvoje. MMR a COŽP UK, 2016.
• HALL, Robert E. et al. The vision of a smart city. Brookhaven National Lab., Upton, NY (US), 2000.
• HAMMAN, Philippe – ANQUETIN, Virginie – MONICOLLE, Céline. Contemporary Meanings of the ‘Sustainable City’: A Comparative Review of the French and English Language Literature. Sustainable Development, 2017, 25.4: 336–355.
• HÖJER, Mattias – WANGEL, Josefin. Smart sustainable cities: definition and challenges. In: IKT innovations for sustainability. Springer, Cham, 2015. p. 333–349.How do we understand smart cities? An evolutionary perspective.
• HOLMAN, Nancy. Incorporating local sustainability indicators into structures of local governance: a review of the literature. Local environment, 2009, 14.4: 365–375.
• HUMPHRIES, Courtney. The too-smart city. The Boston Globe, 2013, 19.
• ICLEI. Sustainable city [online]. ICLEI, 2017. [vid. 29. 10. 2017]. Dostupné z: http://www.iclei.org/activities/agendas/sustainable-city.html.
• ITALIA, Ambiente. Towards a Local Sustainability Profile: European Common Indicators. Luxemburg, European Commission, 2000.
• JANOUŠKOVÁ, Svatava – HÁK, Tomáš – ŠVEC, Petr. Metodika hodnocení udržitelných měst. Audit udržitelného rozvoje pro realizátory MA21 v ČR. 3. vydání. Praha: NSZM, 2017.
• JEŽEK, Jiří. Kritická analýza strategického plánování obcí, měst a regionů v České republice: identifikace problémových oblastí a návrh řešení. Plzeň: ZČU, 2015.
• JUNG, John G. Smart Communities: Digitally-Inclined and Content-Rich. NTQ-AUSTIN TEXAS-, 1998, 6: 19–26.
• KENNEDY, Christopher – PINCETL, Stephanie – BUNJE, Paul. The study of urban metabolism and its applications to urban planning and design. Environmental pollution, 2011, 159.8: 1965–1973.
• LOHRMAN, Dan. The Good, the Bad and the Ugly. [online]. Government Technology, 2016 [vid. 29. 10. 2017]. Dostupné z: http://www.govtech.com/blogs/lohrmann-on-cybersecurity/smart-cities-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly.html.
• MOISES, Jürgen. Smart cities – who will build the cities of tomorrow? [online]. Goethe Institute, 2015. [vid. 29.10.2017]. Dostupné z: https://www.goethe.de/en/kul/ges/20573444.html.
• NEWMAN, Peter. Sustainability and cities: extending the metabolism model. Landscape and urban planning, 1999, 44.4: 219–226.
• OECD, 2017. Resilient cities. Preliminary version. Paris: OECD, Paris.
• PERIS-ORTIZ, Marta – BENNETT, Dag R. – YÁBAR, Diana Pérez-Bustamante. Sustainable Smart Cities. Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management. Cham: Springer International Publishing Switzerland, 2017.
• PHILLIS, Yannis A. – KOUIKOGLOU, Vassilis S. – VERDUGO, Catalina. Urban sustainability assessment and ranking of cities. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2017, 64: 254–265.
• Ranking The World’s ‘Smartest’ Cities [online]. Forbes: IESE Business School, 2016 [vid. 29. 10. 2017]. Dostupné z: https://www.forbes.com/sites/iese/2016/07/06/the-worlds smartest-cities/#78c75fce4ab9.
• REDCLIFT, Michael. Sustainable development: Exploring the contradictions. Routledge, 2002.
• REES, William; WACKERNAGEL, Mathis. Urban ecological footprints: why cities cannot be sustainable – and why they are a key to sustainability. Environmental impact assessment review, 1996, 16.4-6: 223–248.
• ROBINSON, John. Squaring the circle? Some thoughts on the idea of sustainable development. Ecological economics, 2004, 48.4: 369–384.
• ROBINSON, Rick. Six inconvenient truths about Smart Cities [online]. The Urban Technologist, 2015. [vid. 29. 10. 2017]. Dostupné z: https://theurbantechnologist.com/2015/02/15/6-inconvenient-truths-about-smart-cities/.
• SHAHROKNI, Hossein – LAZAREVIC, David – BRANDT, Nils. Smart urban metabolism: towards a real-time understanding of the energy and material flows of a city and its citizens. Journal of Urban Technology, 2015, 22.1: 65–86.
• SMARTCITIESWORLD. Learning from a cyber attack [on-line]. SmartCitiesWorld, 2017. [cit. 25. 10. 2017]. Dostupné z: https://smartcitiesworld.net/news/news/learning-from-a-cyber-attack-1696.
• SMUTNÝ, Martin a kol. (eds.) Metodika hodnocení kategorie „A“ Místní agendy 21 [on-line]. Praha: Integra a NSZM, 2012. [cit. 25. 10. 2017]. Dostupné z: http://dataplan.info/img_upload/f96fc5d7def29509aeffc6784e61f65b/metodika_a_ma21_final_verze1.1_duben-2012.pdf.
• SÖDERSTRÖM, Ola – PAASCHE, Till – KLAUSER, Francisco. Smart cities as corporate storytelling. City, 2014, 18.3: 307–320.
• TRAPENBERG FRICK, Karen – WEINZIMMER, David – WADDELL, Paul. The politics of sustainable development opposition: State legislative efforts to stop the United Nation’s Agenda 21 in the United States. Urban Studies, 2015, 52.2: 209–232.
• TURCU, Catalina. Re-thinking sustainability indicators: local perspectives of urban sustainability. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2013, 56.5: 695–719.
• VLÁDA ČR. Efektivní veřejná správa a přátelské veřejné služby. Strategie realizace Smart Administration v období 2007–2015. Praha: ÚV ČR, 2007.
• WBCSD. Sustainable Cities Engagement Model [on-line]. WBCSD, 2017. [cit. 25. 10. 2017]. Dostupné z: http://www.wbcsd.org/Projects/Sustainable-Cities/Sustainable-Cities-Engagement-Model.
• WCED, UNCED et al. Our common future. World Commission on Environment and Development, Oxford University Press, 1987.
• WOLMAN, Abel. The metabolism of cities. Scientific American, 1965, 213.3: 179–190.