English animal zero plurals. A new explanation

• Authors: Berezowski Leszek
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The paper explores English animal zero plurals using data culled from the BNC and argues that the rarely discussed pattern is motivated by a cognitive factor. Specifically, it is argued that the use of the zero plural mirrors the inability to individuate referents in their natural habitat, i.e. the inability to distinguish between particular individuals. In nouns designating aquatic creatures the inability is rooted in the fact that human eyesight is able to penetrate the water surface only to a very limited extent, which makes animals that live underwater and do not surface practically invisible (e.g. They caught lots of herring vs. They observed a pod of whales). In the case of land animals and birds the inability is due to the fact that some animals live in large groups, which thwarts distinguishing particular specimens (e.g. They watched a herd of wildebeest / a covey of quail vs. They spooked a couple of grizzly bears). It is further shown that the zero plural pattern is the most widespread in generic contexts (e.g. There are about 2,700 species of snake), which accords well with the explanation argued for in the paper as species are mental constructs that can be readily talked about but are invisible to the naked eye.

Keywords

EN

number; English animal zero plural

• Publisher: Oficyna Wydawnicza ATUT – Wrocławskie Wydawnictwo Oświatowe
• Journal: Beiträge zur allgemeinen und vergleichenden Sprachwissenschaft
• Year: 2020
• Issue: 9
• Pages: 7-27

Contributors

author

Berezowski Leszek

• Uniwersytet Wrocławski, Poland

References

• Acquaviva Paulo, 2008, Lexical Plurals. A Morphosemantic Approach, Oxford.
• Allan Keith, 1976, Collectivizing, in: Archivum Linguisticum 7, pp. 99-118.
• Biber Douglas / Johansson Stig / Leech Geoffrey / Conrad Susan / Finegan Edward, 1999, Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English, London.
• Corbett Greville, 2000, Number, Cambridge.
• Evans Vyvyan / Green Melanie, 2006, Cognitive Linguistics. An Introduction, Edinburgh.
• Grimm Scott, 2018, Grammatical number and the scale of individuation, in: Language 94, pp. 527-574.
• Jespersen Otto, 1914, A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, part II: Syntax, London.
• Quirk Randolph / Greenbaum Sidney / Leech Geoffrey / Svartvik Jan, 1972, A grammar of Contemporary English, London.
• Quirk Randolph / Greenbaum Sidney / Leech Geoffrey / Svartvik Jan, 1985, A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language, London.
• Sweet Henry, 1898, A New English Grammar, Logical and Historical, Oxford.
• Toupin Fabienne, 2015, About Plural Morphology and Game Animals: from Old English to Present-Day English, in: Lexis, Journal in English Lexicology 9, pp. 95-122; [https://lexis.revues.org/964].
• Zandvoort Reinard Willem, 1960, A Handbook of English Grammar, London.
• The British National Corpus, version 2 (BNC World), 2001, Distributed by Oxford University Computing Services on behalf of the BNC Consortium. URL: http://www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk/

Identifiers

DOI

10.23817/bzspr.9-1