Luke’s Divine Call of Jesus. Part Two

• Authors: Robert Lee Williams

Abstracts

EN

This study is being published in two parts, the first extending through four occasions of divine guidance and the Travel Narrative in the previous issue, and this part beginning with the fifth and final instance of guidance. The abstract of the study as a whole is as follows. Luke represents Jesus’ death as the martyrdom of a prophet. M. Dibelius noted this in 1919. C.H. Talbert added in 1982 that Jesus’ death “is not an atoning sacrifice.” Such an assessment of Jesus and his death, for the “Christ” who “atones for sins,” is anemic to some scholars. F. Bovon prefers to say, “[T]he attitude of the people... testifies not only to the exemplary character but also to the redemptive nature of the passion.” The question is thus posed: Was Jesus’ passion in Luke “redemptive”? The answer is found in Luke’s divine call of Jesus. Luke portrays Jesus as being progressively informed of God’s plans for him on five occasions, each evidently following a time of prayer. The first, after his baptism (3:21b-22), reveals to him divine approval in royal and servant terminology. Next, after a night of prayer (6:12), he selects twelve apostles and proclaims new teaching in the “Sermon on the Plain.” Then come two times of prayer (9:18, 29), the first prior to and the second on the occasion of his visible transformation on a mountain, the “Transfiguration,” regarding Jesus’ prophetic role and his coming suffering. Finally, after declaring at his last meal the beginning of a new covenant, but without reference to sacrifice for sins, he prays for guidance one last time on the Mount of Olives (22:41-44), preparing for anticipated suffering and vindication. We conclude that Jesus’ death, in Luke’s Gospel, is the martyrdom of a prophet that does not atone for sins but does seal a new covenant (22:20).

Keywords

PL

Łukasz; Ewangelia Łukasza; Jezus; izajaszowy sługa Jahwe; prorok; Chrystus; męczeństwo; nowe przymierze

EN

Luke; Gospel of Luke; Jesus; Isaianic servant of Yahweh; prophet; Christ; martyrdom; new covenant

• Publisher: Akademia Katolicka w Warszawie
• Journal: Warszawskie Studia Teologiczne
• Year: 2024
• Volume: 37
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 243-269

Dates

published

2024

Contributors

author

Robert Lee Williams

• B.H. Carroll Theological Seminary, Irving TX, USA

• https://orcid.org/0009000827428898

References

• Barbour, R.S. (1969-70). Gethsemane in the Passion Narrative. New Testament Studies, 16, pp. 231-51.
• Bauer, W. (1957). A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and other Early Christian Literature (2nd ed.; W.F. Arndt, F.W. Gingrich, and F.W. Danker, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Blass, F., and Debrunner, A. A Greek Grammar of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature (R. Funk, Rev. and Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Blinzler, J. (1969). Der Prozess Jesu (Rev. ed., Vol. 4). Regensburg: F. Pustet.
• Bock, D.L. (2012). A Theology of Luke and Acts. God’s Promised Program, Realized for All Nations. Grand Rapids: Zondervan.
• Bornhäuser, K.B. (1958). The Death and Resurrection of Jesus Christ. Bangalore: C.L.S. Press.
• Bovon, F. (1973). Le salut dans les écrits de Luc: Essai. Revue de théologie et de philosophie, 23 (4), pp. 296-307.
• Bovon, F. (2012a). Luke 2. A Commentary on the Gospel of Luke 9:51-19:27. (D.S. Deer, Trans.). Hermeneia. Minneapolis: Fortress.
• Bovon, F. (2012b). Luke 3. A Commentary on the Gospel of Luke 19:28-24:53. (J.S. Crouch, Trans.). Hermeneia Minneapolis: Fortress.
• Brawley, R.L. (2016). Luke. In Aymer, M., Kittredge, C.B., Sάnchez, D.A. (Eds.), The Gospels and Acts. Fortress Commentary on the Bible Study Edition. Minneapolis: Fortress.
• Brun, L. (1933). Engel und Blutschweiss Lc. 22, 43-44. Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft und die Kunde der älteren Kirche, 32, pp. 265-76.
• Catchpole, D. (1971a). The Answer of Jesus to Caiaphas (Matt. xxvi.64). New Testament Studies, 17, pp. 213-26.
• Catchpole, D. (1971b). The Trial of Jesus. A Study in the Gospels and Jewish Historiography from 1770 to the Present Day. Leiden: Brill.
• Dibelius, M. (1965). From Tradition to Gospel. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
• Dinkler, M.B. (2023). Luke: Introduction. In McKenzie, S.L., De Troyer, K, Spencer, F.S., (Eds.), The SBL Study Bible: New Revised Standard Version Updated Version (pp. 1827-32). HarperCollins.
• Du Plessis, I.J. (1994). The Saving Significance of Jesus and His Death on the Cross in Luke’s Gospel – Focusing on Luke 22:19b-20. Neotestamentica 28, pp. 523-40.
• Dussaut, L. (1987). Le triptyque, des apparitions en Luc 24 (analyse structurelle). Revue Biblique 94, pp. 161-213.
• Ellis, E.E. (1966). The Gospel of Luke. New Century Bible. New York: Nelson.
• Green, J.B. (1995). The Theology of the Gospel of Luke. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Green, J.B. (1997). The Gospel of Luke. NICNT. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
• Grundmann, W. (1966). Das Evangelium nach Lukas. Theologischer Handkommentar zum Neuen Testament (Vol. 3). Berlin: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt.
• Jeremias, J. (1967). παῖς θεοῦ. In G. Friedrich (Ed.), Theological Dictionary of the New Testament (G. Bromiley, Trans., Vol. 5, pp. 654-714). Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
• Jeremias, J. (1972). The Parables of Jesus (2nd ed.; S.H. Hooke, Trans.). New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
• Junod, É. (1982). Polymorphie du Dieu Sauveur. In J. Ries (Ed.), Gnosticism et monde hellénstique. Publications de l’Institut orientaliste de Louvain 27. Louvain-La-Neuve: Université catholique de Louvain, pp. 38-46.
• Kimbell, J. (2012). Jesus’ Death in Luke-Acts: The New Covenant Sacrifice. Southern Baptist Journal of Theology 16.3, pp. 28-48.
• Liefeld, W.L. (1984). Luke. In F.E. Gaebelein, J.D. Douglas (Eds.), The Expositor’s Bible Commentary (Vol. 8, pp. 797-1059). Grand Rapids: Zondervan.
• Marshall, I.H. (1978). Commentary on Luke. NIGTC. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
• Marshall, I.H. (1988). Luke. Historian Theologian, 3rd ed. Downers Grove: IVP.
• Monloubou, L. (1976). La prière selon saint Luc. recherche d’une structure. Lectio Divina 89. Paris: Cerf.
• Moo, D.J. (1983). The Old Testament in the Gospel Passion Narratives. Sheffield: Almond.
• Morgenthaler, R. (1948). Die Lukanische Geschichtsschreibung als Zeugnis. Zürich: Zwingli Verlag.
• Schnackenburg, R. (1959). Die Erwartung des ‘Propheten’ nach dem Neuen Testament und den Qumran-Texten. Studia Evangelica I. Texte und Untersuchungen zur Geschichte der altchristlichen Literatur, (Vol. 73, pp. 622-39). Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
• Schrenk, G. (1964). εὐδοκέω, εὐδοκία. In G. Kittel (Ed.), Theological Dictionary of the New Testament (G. Bromiley, Trans., Vol. 2, pp. 738-51). Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
• Soards, M.L. (1985). The Silence of Jesus before Herod: An Interpretive Suggestion. Australian Biblical Review 33, pp. 41-45.
• Strauss, M.L. (1995). The Davidic Messiah in Luke-Acts: The Promise and Its Fulfillment in Lukan Christology, Journal for the Study of the New Testament Supplement Series 110. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic.
• Talbert, C.H. (1982). Reading Luke. A Literary and Theological Commentary on the Third Gospel. New York: Crossroad.
• Talbert, C.H. (2002). Reading Luke. A Literary and Theological Commentary on the Third Gospel. Rev. ed. Macon: Smyth Helwys.
• Trites, A.A. (1977). The New Testament Concept of Witness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Trompf, G.W. (1979). The Idea of Historical Recurrence in Western Thought: From Antiquity to the Reformation. Berkeley: University of California.
• Vermes, G. (1981). Jesus the Jew. A Historian’s Reading of the Gospels. Minneapolis: Fortress.
• Williams, R.L. (2024). Spectral Lives by Luke and Philostratus. Journeying of Holy Men. Lanham: Lexington.

Identifiers

DOI

10.30439/WST.2024.2.12

Biblioteka Nauki

63510769