How do differences in exposure affect English language learning? A comparison of teenagers in two learning environments

• Authors: Carmen Muñoz , Teresa Cadierno

Abstracts

EN

This study investigates whether potential differences in the weight of out-of-school and in-school learning environments affect the acquisition of L2 English by teenagers in two geographical contexts, more and less English-rich, and with less and more linguistic distance to English, respectively. Participants were two groups of 14-15-year-olds, from Denmark and Spain. Language measures included a listening comprehension test, a metalinguistic knowledge test, and a grammaticality judgment test. Data about out-of-classroom exposure was elicited via a questionnaire. The study showed that (a) the Danish group attained a significantly higher level in all language tests except for the metalinguistic knowledge test; (b) the Danish group engaged longer in out-of-school activities although the preference for some activities over others was similar in the two groups; and (c) the types of associations between out-of-school activities and language measures were different between the two groups. These results suggest that the potential influence of out-of-school activities on different language aspects is related to the particular context in which the L2 is learned and to the language proficiency of the learner.

Keywords

EN

out-of-school input; in-school input; linguistic distance; adolescents; subtitles

• Publisher: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
• Journal: Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching
• Year: 2021
• Volume: 11
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 185-212

Dates

published

2021

Contributors

author

Carmen Muñoz

• University of Barcelona, Spain

• https://orcid.org/0000000270014155

author

Teresa Cadierno

• University of Southern Denmark, Odense

• https://orcid.org/0000000283051027

References

• Azzolini, D., Campregher, S., & Madia, J. E. (2020). Formal instruction vs informal exposure: What matters more for teenagers’ acquisition of English as a second language? Research Papers in Education, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2020.1789718
• Bybee, J. (1995). Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes,10, 425-455.
• Cadierno, T., & Eskildsen, S. W. (Eds.). (2015). Usage-based perspectives on second language learning. Mouton de Gruyter.
• Cadierno, T., Hansen, M., Lauridsen, J. T., Eskildsen, S. W., Fenyvesi, K., Hannibal Jensen, S., & aus der Wieschen, M. V. (2020). Does younger mean better? Age of onset, learning rate and short-term L2 proficiency in young Danish learners of English. VIAL, 17, 57-86.
• de Bot, K. (2014). The effectiveness of early foreign language learning in the Netherlands. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 4(3), 409-418. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2014.4.3.2
• DeKeyser, R. M. (2012). Age effects in second language learning. In S. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 442-460). Routledge.
• De Wilde, V., & Eyckmans, J. (2017). Game on! Young learners’ incidental language learning of English prior to instruction. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 7(4), 673-694. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.1017.7.4.6
• De Wilde, V., Brysbaert, M., & Eyckmans, J. (2020a). Learning English through out-of school exposure: How do word-related variables and proficiency influence receptive vocabulary learning? Language Learning, 70(2), 349-381.
• De Wilde, V., Brysbaert, M., & Eyckmans, J. (2020b). Learning English through out-of school exposure. Which levels of language proficiency are attained and which types of input are important? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(1), 171-185.
• De Wilde, V., Brysbaert, M., & Eyckmans., J. (2021). Young learners’ L2 English after the onset of instruction: Longitudinal development of L2 proficiency and the role of individual differences. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 24(3), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728920000747
• Doughty, C. (2003). Instructed SLA: Constraints, compensation, and enhancement. In M. Long & C. Doughty (Eds.), Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 257-310). Blackwell.
• Dyen, I., Kruskal, J. B., & Black, P. (1992). An Indoeuropean classification: A lexicostatistical experiment. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 82(5), iii-132.
• Ellis, N. C. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143-188. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102002024
• Ellis, N. C. (2005). At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 305-352.
• Ellis, N. C., & Cadierno, T. (2009). Constructing a second language: Introduction to the special section. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7, 111-139.
• Ellis, R. (2009). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language. In R. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, R. Erlam, J. Philp, & H. Reinders (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching (pp. 31-64). Multilingual Matters.
• Ellis, R., Loewen, S., Elder, C., Erlam, R., Philip, J., & Reinders, H. (Eds.). (2009). Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching. Multilingual Matters.
• European Commission. (2012). First European survey on language competences: Education and training. Publications Office of the European Union.
• Gass, S., Winke, P., Isbell, D., & Ahn, J. (2019). How captions help people learn languages: A working-memory, eye-tracking study. Language Learning & Technology, 23(2), 84-104.
• Greenberg, J. H. (2001). The methods and purposes of linguistic genetic classification. Language and Linguistics, 2, 111-135.
• Grønnum, N. (2001). Fonetik og fonologi: Almen og dansk. Akademisk Forlag.
• Gutiérrez, X. (2012). Implicit knowledge, explicit knowledge, and achievement in second language (L2) Spanish. The Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15(1), 20-41
• Hannibal Jensen, S. (2017). Gaming as an English language learning resource among young children in Denmark. CALICO Journal, 34(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.29519
• Huang, B. H., Shawn Chang, Y-H., Zhi, M., & Niu, L. (2020). The effect of input on bilingual adolescents’ long-term language outcomes in a foreign language instruction context. International Journal of Bilingualism, 24(1), 8-25.
• Johannsdóttir, Á. (2018). English exposure and vocabulary proficiency at the onset of English instruction. In B. Arnbjörnsdóttir & H. Ingvarsdóttir (Eds.), Language development across the life-span: The impact of English on education and work in Iceland (pp. 57-78). Springer International Publishing.
• Kuppens, A. H. (2010). Incidental foreign language acquisition from media exposure. Learning, Media and Technology, 35(1), 65-85.
• Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford University Press.
• Lee, M., & Révész, A. (2020). Promoting grammatical development through captions and textual enhancement in multimodal input-based tasks. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42(3), 577-598. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263120000108
• Lindgren, E., & Muñoz, C. (2013). The influence of exposure, parents, and linguistic distance on young European learners’ foreign language comprehension. International Journal of Multilingualism, 10(1), 105-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2012.679275
• Long, M. H. (2020). Optimal input for language learning: Genuine, simplified, elaborated, or modified elaborated? Language Teaching, 53(2), 169-182.
• Maie, R., & DeKeyser. R. (2020). Conflicting evidence of explicit and implicit knowledge from objective and subjective measures. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42(2), 359-382. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263119000615
• Mayer, R. (Ed.). (2014). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press.
• Muñoz, C. (2006). The effects of age on foreign language learning: The BAF project. In C. Muñoz (Ed.), Age and the rate of foreign language learning (pp. 1-40). Multilingual Matters.
• Muñoz, C. (2011). Is input more significant than starting age in foreign language acquisition? International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL), 49, 113-133.
• Muñoz, C. (2014). Contrasting effects of starting age and input on the oral performance of foreign language learners. Applied Linguistics, 35(4), 463-482.
• Muñoz, C. (2020). Boys like games and girls like movies: Age and gender differences in out-of-school contact with English. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, 33(1), 171-201. https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.18042.mun
• Muñoz, C., Cadierno, T., & Casas, I. (2018). Different starting points for early English language learning: A comparative study of Danish and Spanish young learners. Language Learning, 68(4), 1076-1109.
• Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford University Press.
• Pattemore, A., & Muñoz, C. (2020). Learning L2 constructions from captioned audio-visual exposure: The effect of learner-related factors. System, 93, 1-13.
• Peters, E. (2018). The effect of out-of-school exposure to English language media on learners’ vocabulary knowledge. ITL – International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 169(1), 142-167.
• Peters, E., Noreillie, A., Heylen, K., Bulté, B., & Desmet. P. (2019). The impact of instruction and out-of-school exposure to foreign language input on learners’ vocabulary knowledge in two languages. Language Learning, 69, 943-977.
• Peters, E., & Webb, S. (2018). Incidental vocabulary acquisition through viewing L2 television and factors that affect learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(3), 551-77. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263117000407
• Puimège, E., & Peters, E. (2019). Learners’ English vocabulary knowledge prior to formal instruction: The role of learner-related and word-related variables. Language Learning, 69(4), 943-977. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12364
• Pujadas, G., & Muñoz, C. (2019). Extensive viewing of captioned and subtitled TV series: A study of L2 vocabulary learning by adolescents. The Language Learning Journal, 47(4), 479-496.
• Rodgers, M. P. H., & Heidt, J. (2021). Levelling up comprehensible input and vocabulary learning: The lexical profile of videogames. In W. Valentin & R. Tegge (Eds.), Pop culture in language education (pp. 215-227). Routledge.
• Saito, K., & Hanzawa, K. (2018). The role of input in second language oral ability development in foreign language classrooms: A longitudinal study. Language Teaching Research, 22, 398-417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816679030
• Sockett, G., & Toffoli, D. (2012). Beyond learner autonomy: A dynamic systems view of the informal learning of English in virtual online communities. ReCALL, 24, 138-151. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344012000031
• Sun, H., Steinkrauss, R., Tendeiro, J., & de Bot, K. (2016). Individual differences in very young children’s English acquisition in China: Internal and external factors. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19, 550-566. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2016.1178706
• Sundqvist, P., & Sylvén, L. K. (2014). Language-related computer use: Focus on young L2 English learners in Sweden. ReCALL, 26, 3-20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344013000232
• Sundqvist, P., & Sylvén, L. K. (2016). Extramural English in teaching and learning: From theory and research to practice. Palgrave Macmillan.
• Sundqvist, P., & Wikström, P. (2015). Out-of-school digital gameplay and in-school L2 English vocabulary outcomes. System, 51, 65-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.04.001
• Sydorenko, T. (2010). Modality of input and vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning & Technology, 14 (2), 50-73.
• Sylvén, L. K., & Sundqvist, P. (2012). Gaming as extramural English L2 learning and L2 proficiency among young learners. ReCALL, 24(3), 302-321. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095834401200016X
• Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard University Press.
• Unsworth, S., Persson, L., Prins, T., & de Bot, K. (2015). An investigation of factors affecting early foreign language learning in the Netherlands. Applied Linguistics, 36, 527-548. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt052
• Verspoor, M. H., de Bot, K., & van Rein, E. (2011). English as a foreign language: The role of out-of-school language input. In A. De Houwer & A. Wilton (Eds.), English in Europe today: Sociocultural and educational perspectives (pp. 148-166). John Benjamins.
• Webb, S., & Rodgers, M. P. H. (2009). The vocabulary demands of television programs. Language Learning, 59(2), 335-66.
• Wisnieska, N., & Mora, J. C. (2020). Can captioned video benefit second language pronunciation? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42(3), 599-624. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263120000029

Identifiers

DOI

10.14746/ssllt.2021.11.2.2

Biblioteka Nauki

1203050