Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 5

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
IT
In the article we discuss semantic connectivity o f set o f synonymous adjectives series. We present models o f connection o f selected types o f French and Polish adjectives, frequency o f their appearance and methods o f realization in individual synonymous series.
EN
In the article we discuss semantic connectivity of set of synonymous adjectives series. We present models of connection of selected types of French and Polish adjectives, frequency of their appearance and methods of realization in individual synonymous series.
PL
The article presents a brief overview of the results of research on synonymity including different views and various ways of defining the problem. The author then goes on to emphasize the important role of context in the description of the analyzed items. She also includes the notion of connotation closely connected with the chosen material. The present article describes typical relations between French and Polish synonymous adjectives series.
PL
Uznanie zmian klimatu jako mnożnika zagrożeń doprowadziło do włączenia niniejszej problematyki do studiów nad bezpieczeństwem. Większość badań koncentrujących się na roli aktorów sekurytyzujących analizuje działania państw, międzynarodowych organizacji pozarządowych, a także podmiotów regionalnych, takich jak Unia Europejska. Ograniczoną uwagę poświęcono wymiarowi sprawiedliwości. Niniejszy artykuł uzupełnia istniejącą lukę. Celem badania jest przeprowadzenie analizy przez pryzmat teorii sekurytyzacji, odpowiadając na pytanie, w jaki sposób decyzje wydane przez sądy holenderskie w sprawie Urgenda Foundation przeciwko Królestwu Niderlandów wpłynęły na sekurytyzację zmian klimatu. Zastosowanie analizy dyskursu jako metodologii badań dowiodło, że sądy holenderskie orzekając o prawnym obowiązku rządu Królestwa Niderlandów do zapobiegania zmianom klimatu w celu ochrony obywateli, przyczyniły się do pogłębienia procesu sekurytyzacji środowiska naturalnego
EN
Since climate change is broadly recognised as a threat multiplier, the environmental problems are considered in the sense of security. Academic articles are focused on analysing states, international non-governmental organisations, as well as regional entities such as the European Union as securitising actors. Limited attention has been given to the judiciary. This article fills the existing gap. The aim of the research is to analyse how do the Dutch Courts securitise the climate in adjudicating the case Urgenda Foundation v. The State of The Netherlands, through the lens of the securitisation theory. The implementation of discourse analysis as a research methodology has proved that the Dutch courts have contributed to environmental securitisation by ruling on the legal obligation of the Dutch government to prevent dangerous climate change in order to protect its citizens
EN
The present inquiry is designed to reveal how meaningful components, variously interrelated, eventually result in semantic differences discovered in adjectival synonymous clusters in French and in Polish. The method of conducting this comparative analysis is to match lexical paraphrases of synonymous items in both languages. The data are underpinned by well documented and authentic examples. The concept of cross-language equivalence of selected lexical units is highlighted, thus enabling further developments to be carried out in the fields of foreign language teaching and translation practice. The study of empirical material is complemented with a concise sketch dealing with theoretical aspects of synonymy.
PL
Mikołaj Nkollo & Magdalena Tkaczyk. Inflection - semantics interfaces in a typological setting: number and non-specific nominal items in Old Spanish legal codices. The Poznań Society for the Advancement of Arts and Sciences, PL ISSN 0079-4740, pp. 17-29 The present inquiry has been spurred by the observation of the morphological behaviour of human-denoting common nouns in Old Spanish codices (13th to 15th century). In spite of the fact that legal norms are designed to apply to an unrestricted number of potential addressees, this class of nominal items surfaces nearly exclusively in the singular, with plural forms being strongly underrepresented. A series of parameters converge to account for this form - function mismatch, thus revealing an essentially interdependent nature of linguistic mechanisms underlying it: type of inflection (inherent vs. contextual), text genre characteristics (distance pole vs proximate pole) and syntactic environment (conditional protases). The pervasiveness of the singular is traced back to non-specificity. Out of two mutually exclusive typological clines accounting for the likelihood of inflectional variation in noun morphology, Definiteness Hierarchy is given preference over degrees of animacy: non-specifically used items, even if highly ranked on animacy scale, are the least likely to surface as plural forms. Competing motivations are assumed to provide a suitable analytical framework to account for typological conflicts such as the one exemplified in Old Spanish legal codices.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.