Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 7

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
100%
Filo-Sofija
|
2012
|
vol. 12
|
issue 1(16)
127-148
EN
This paper presents the beginnings (1912–1916) of Heidegger’s philosophy from the perspective of his early interest in the issue of question as such. The result of this focus was Heidegger’s little-known lecture delivered in 1915 at Heinrich Rickert’s seminar, entitled Frage und Urteil (Question and judgment). Without going into the details of Heidegger’s presentation, the present paper gives a broad introduction to the issues discussed there. It does this in several steps. First, it considers the spiritual motives of Heidegger’s interest in logic. Second, it attempts to systematize Heidegger’s early views on logic and its subject. Third, it draws attention to the importance and development of Heidegger’s phenomenologica of questions. Fourth, it points out that Heidegger’s interest in the question as such is closely linked with numerous (in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century) attempts to consider the problem of question in the framework of the philosophical study of the essence of cognition and being. These four issues create a starting point for understanding the specifics of Heidegger’s question of being.
EN
In his phenomenological manifesto (1911), Edmund Husserl presents the famous motto, which should be realized by the new philosophy: “Weg mit den hohlen Wortanalysen. Die Sachen selbst wir müssen befragen. (...) Ganz trefflich! Aber was sind denn die Sachen (...)?“ Consequently, the history of phenomenology is presented as the sum of the efforts to reach the deeper level and more fundamental areas of the original "Sachen". Husserl’s discovery of the domain of pure consciousness was only the beginning of a long way leading to more original areas, such as life, existence, body, intersubjectivity, historicity, humanity etc. With this journey towards deeper fields of sense-constitution, the meaning of the phenomenological method was changed. Phenomenology cannot be a simple work of lonely soul looking for self-transparency in the field of its own consciousness, but it must be a kind of action, a deed, an existential transformation, and an increase of experience. Recently, e.g. Natalie Depraz presented a similar view. In my paper I would like to explore the possibility of a new perspective on phenomenology, which gives the philosophy and theatrical practice of Polish theater reformer Jerzy Grotowski (1933-1999). Although he was neither phenomenologist, nor a philosopher, in his notes on the human performance, collected and entitled Thoward a Poor Theater, he opens, as it seems, new possibilities of phenomenological practice.
4
100%
Filo-Sofija
|
2012
|
vol. 12
|
issue 3(18)
243-262
EN
The purpose of this article is to present a certain idea of religiousness. It could be called religiousness without God and without faith. I found its premises in the work of the Polish theatre reformer Jerzy Grotowski. He was neither a prophet nor the founder of the religion; primarily, he was a man of theatre. But for him, in the age of “God’s death” the theatre was a substitute of religion and religious experience. He understood his “poor theatre” as a search for sense of life, an authentic life and the world’s salvation. At various stages of his artistic way, which I present in the first unit of this article, he tried to reach to deeper dimensions of reality. In the end, he went far beyond the theatre. In the second unit, I show the features of religiousness without God and faith. In this religiousness, God exists and does not exists, he is a question, or doubtfulness. The Faith is a physical action, instead of seriousness, we have irony, grotesque, buffo.
5
100%
PL
W roku 1953 na łamach Philosophische Rundschau pojawił się głośny artykuł Waltera Schulza pt. „Über den philosophiegeschichtlichen Ort Martin Heideggers” („O filozoficzno-dziejowym miejscu Martina Heideggera”). We wstępie tego artykułu jego autor zauważa, że dotychczasowe próby zrozumienia filozofii Heideggera przez pryzmat dziejów oscylowały między dwiema skrajnościami: albo próbowały one ukazać filozofię Heideggera jako coś absolutnie nowego, jako początek „nowego myślenia”, które zostawia za sobą, „przezwycięża” dawną „metafizykę obecności” i „metafizykę podmiotu”, albo też, odwrotnie, próbowały one deprecjonować myśl Heideggera, pokazując, że jest ona w istocie bądź jakąś odmianą znanych z tradycji stanowisk filozoficznych – ot, choćby myśli Kierkegaarda, Hegla czy mistyków niemieckich – bądź też jakimś gatunkiem „metafizyki światła”, „metafizyki źródła” czy „metafizyki refleksji”. W przeciwieństwie do tych prób, których do końca XX wieku pojawiły się dziesiątki najprzeróżniejszych mutacji, proponuje Schulz „pokazać, że filozofia Heideggera wtedy tylko zostanie rzeczowo pojęta, gdy się ją zrozumie dziejowo jako wewnętrzny koniec dziania się zachodniej metafizyki”. Oznacza to, że nie jest ona ani całkowicie wpisana w tradycję, ani całkowicie czymś od niej odciętym
6
100%
Filo-Sofija
|
2011
|
vol. 11
|
issue 2-3(13-14)
737-768
EN
The purpose of this paper is to present ontology of nature in the early Heidegger’s philosophy (1919–1929). Although Heidegger had never developed systematic “ontology of nature” as separated branch of the philosophy, problem of understanding the nature is one of the most important ones. I distinguish five different concepts of the nature: 1. the life, 2. that what is beyond understanding; the nature outside being, 3. the nature as a research object of nature science, 4. environment, 5. the nature in terms of ontology of body. The latter leads to question of well-founding the philosophy.
7
Content available remote

Geneza, struktura i dynamika Seinsfrage

100%
Filo-Sofija
|
2010
|
vol. 10
|
issue 2(11)
41-71
EN
The main purpose of this article is to present the genesis, structure and dynamics of the most important thought of Martin Heidegger’s philosophy (the question of Being). Since the very beginning of Heidegger’s logical research he was interested in these forms of utterance, which previously had been acknowledged as of marginal significance in discovering the truth and the structure of science. The question of Being is phenomenological unity which has replaced traditional assigning of being and proposition. From this perspective all of the traditional logical and ontological problematic changes itself radically. By considering the question Heidegger revealed the ontological difference and the place of revelation which is a common people’s being (the everyday life).
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.