Problemy relacji między językiem a społeczeństwem przyciągają uwagę badaczy reprezentujących różne dziedziny nauki: filozofię, historię, biologię, językoznawstwo, teologię, pedagogikę, psychologię itp. Niniejsze opracowanie aktualizuje socjologiczne podejście do badania uwarunkowania powstawania wielojęzyczności jako środka komunikacji zawodowej.Wyniki badań socjologicznych pokazują, że około 70% ludności świata, w takim czy innym stopniu, posługuje się dwoma lub więcej językami, co nakłada dodatkowe obowiązki na pracowników zapewniających międzynarodową komunikację zawodową.Współczesna interakcja wielojęzyczna nie powinna być jednostronnie rozumiana jedynie jako zapożyczenie fachowej terminologii języków obcych. Obejmuje społeczne tło materiału językowego: tradycje, kody mimiczne i pantomimiczne, narodowy obraz świata – i staje się najważniejszym czynnikiem profesjonalizacji.Metody: metody analizy systemowej i funkcjonalnej, porównanie, generalizacja i zbieranie danych empirycznych (wywiady eksperckie, analiza treści)
EN
The problems of the relationship between language and society attract the attention of researchers from different countries representing various scientific areas: philosophy, history, biology, linguistics, theology, pedagogy, psychology, etc. This study actualizes the sociological approach to the study of the social determinants of the formation of polylingualism as a means of professional communication. According to the sociological results, about 70% of the world's population, to one degree or another, speaks two or more languages, which imposes additional obligations on workers обеспечивать international professional communications [1]. Modern multilingual interaction should not be one-sidedly ясно only as a borrowing of professional foreign language terminology. It includes the social background of the linguistic материал: traditions, mimic and pantomimic codes, the national picture of the world - and becomes the most important factor in professionalization.
Education is one of the most important social institutions that ensure the socialization of the younger generation: the interiorization of social values, norms, behavior patterns that characterize the basic culture of a society, the formation of life skills and competencies necessary for successful adaptation, personal and social development in current socio-economic, political and socio-cultural conditions. The results of sociological research carried out within the framework of the republican monitoring of the quality of education are analyzed.
Higher education institutions (HEIs) in Armenia and Belarus have been conducted doctoral and postgraduate programs since Soviet Union times. In both countries consisted of two successive scientific (research) degrees: Candidate of Sciences and Doctor of Sciences.The main purpose of research education has been the creation of new investigation; moreover, it gave bigger importance to the results of scholarship rather than formation of scholars with specific knowledge, capacities, and skills, including teaching skills for higher education, dealing with modern technologies, and so on. In contemporary post-industrial societies, knowledge becomes outdated very quickly, making the training of versatile, innovative doctoral candidates a high priority. Their future career and employment opportunities are not limited to scholarly endeavors or teaching activities in traditional academic environment.The new generation of researchers should be competent not only in their professional area, but also have general broad preparedness, including communication, management and entrepreneurial skills.Our article also offers a mixed-method perspective on the investigation of determinants of effectiveness in quality assurance at higher education institutions.
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.