We correct an error and expose two redundancies in the axiom systems presented by Paul Hovda in his 2009 influential paper, ‘What is classical mereology?’.
This paper offers a critical reconstruction of the motivations that led to the development of mereology as we know it today, along with a brief description of some questions that define current research in the field.
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.