Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 5

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
100%
EN
An increasing number of authors tends to distinguish terms: image and reputation. It is hard to describe differences between these terms because it raises a lot of controversy. On the one hand, there is dispute over the understanding of reputation, on the other hand, many institutions while presenting rankings of companies use reputation as a criteria of rankings. The aim of this article is (an attempt) to answer where are the sources of differences in understanding the term of reputation and secondly to show the main criteria which characterize this term.
EN
The concept of corporate social irresponsibility appears relatively rarely in literature and public discourse. Companies are more likely to inform about  positive aspects of their non-profit activities (for their employees, local communities, the environment) than about issues that worsen their image and reputation. However, talking about negative aspects of non-commercial activitiesseems important and worthwhile as it eliminates pathologies (in terms of  corporate social irresponsibility) and increases social trust in activities related to corporate social responsibility.
PL
W literaturze i dyskursie publicznym pojęcie społecznej nieodpowiedzialności biznesu pojawia się stosunkowo rzadko. Przedsiębiorstwa zdecydowanie częściej informują o pozytywnych aspektach swojej działalności pozabiznesowej (działaniach na rzecz pracowników, społeczności lokalnych, ochrony środowiska) niż o kwestiach pogarszających ich wizerunek i reputację w oczach opinii publicznej. Mówienie o negatywnych stronach działalności pozabiznesowej wydaje się jednak istotne, gdyż eliminowanie patologii (społecznej nieodpowiedzialności biznesu) zwiększa społeczne zaufanie do działań w ramach społecznej odpowiedzialności biznesu.  
PL
Jednym z zagadnień powracających w prowadzonych dyskusjach jest kwestia roli przedsiębiorcy w gospodarce rynkowej. Jest to zagadnienie wieloaspektowe, zaś zainteresowania Autora koncentrują się na problemach związanych z wizerunkiem oraz reputacją prywatnego przedsiębiorcy w gospodarce rynkowej. Celem artykułu są odpowiedzi na pytania: jakie są w dobie mediów elektronicznych podstawowe źródła wiedzy o prywatnym przedsiębiorcy oraz jakie skojarzenia wywołuje to pojęcie w opinii publicznej. Określenie "kryzys" w tytule artykułu wskazuje na czas, w którym przeprowadzono badania. Artykuł nie odpowiada na pytanie: w jaki sposób kryzys warunkuje opinie o prywatnym przedsiębiorcy.
EN
In 2014 it has been twenty five years since the economic transformation started. In Poland discussion about economic crisis is connected with an evaluation of the current results of the transformation. One issue that occurred very often in discussion is role of entrepreneur in market economy. This subject is complex and the author's interest focused on image and reputation aspects of private entrepreneur in a market economy. The aim of this article is to answer what are the sources of knowledge about private entrepreneur and what associations it evokes in public opinion.
EN
The author attempts to consider the relationship between freedom of speech and the principles of the free market in three aspects. Firstly, economic recession reduces the market offer and restricts access to newspapers and magazines. Secondly, the concentration of capital in the media and dropping of prices results in a limited number of titles circulating, thus restricting the amount of opinions and news releases reaching the readers. Thirdly, the dependence of editors on the advertisers makes „the one who pays dictate the terms, i.e. select the information and opinion and present himself in good light”. The opinion is frequently encountered that „freedom of speech is the freedom of the editor as opposed to that of a journalist”, which is mainly voiced by the former.
|
2022
|
vol. 43
|
issue 1
75-95
EN
This study experimentally evaluated Polish school students' competence at written communication, understood as one of the forms of social communication. The task, performed online, was designed to see if the students were able to select the most important information from a given base text and to compose new texts on this basis to comply with three different length requirements, and how they behaved under the pressure of the time allocated to complete the sub-tasks. Results from an overall pool of 500 secondary school students from a diverse sample of schools (in the city of Poznań and the surrounding Wielkopolska province) that differed in terms of type and ranking suggest an overall poor competence at various composite skills involved in written social communication: information selection, summarization, logical structuring, and cohesive embellishment. Participants clearly exhibited various problems with concisely formulating thoughts, properly complying with instructions, etc. Composing a short, written message (based on a provided base text) and/or freely embellishing and reformulating information clearly caused them considerable difficulty. The article closes with some suggestions for how the methods used could potentially be improved in future studies of this type.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.