Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  BYRON
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The article is an attempt to define the generic framework of the Polish poetic novel. The major problem, when talking about genology, is the loose and associational structure of many Romantic genres (poetic novel, Romantic drama, Romantic poem and many other types of lyric verse) which freely combines many generic features. Even though it is possible to distinguish fairly stable elements of the poetic novel (the main protagonist, i.e. the Byronic hero, the background and the multiple narration), Polish adaptors of the genre left themselves a substantial margin of freedom. When the Byronic model of the genre was being creatively adopted (from the mid-1820s to the early 1830s), there emerged elegiac novels (Maria by A. Malczewski, An Hour of Thought by J. Słowacki), dramatic novels (Konrad Wallenrod by A. Mickiewicz, The Kaniów Castle by S. Goszczyński) or various mutations of the genre (e.g. strongly dramatized The Story of Wacław by S. Garczyński). The author disagrees with those that negate the autonomy of the genre and present it as a multigenre hybrid. She argues that such a view is wrong, if we look at Romantic thinkers themselves, who saw the poetic novel as a new literary quality and as a different way of understanding the genre. The search for the generic identity of the poetic novel thus leads to a change in the research perspective. It forces us to notice its dynamic structure which is always in the process of changing its identity. The loose, associational generic formula reflects a creative awareness and an active, experimental attitude towards the world.
EN
The youth of nineteenth century Parisian bohemian authors was spent in the mundus melancholicus, Rousseau’s “enchanted world,” which was full of Werther’s mourning, Chateaubriand’s constant feeling of unfulfilment and Byron’s accursed rebellion. The never-ending loneliness of these individuals, the incurable disease of the spirit and the body, the eternal fever consuming the minds of the enfants du siècle continued for quite some time and made an indelible mark on the bohemian poet, instilling in him a desire to look for his own “self,” to fight for a semblance of being in the world of a Romantic homo viator. Successive generations of young bohemians continued this image of a young man suffering in his soul and body, for whom everything that had happened had gone forever, and what would happen was not there yet. A confrontation of such a way of creating one’s moi seul with emerging rules of bohemian being, a bitter note of living with the sweetness of Hernani’s triumph, creates a romantic mosaic of ambiguities, whirling and indefinable, like the mystery of Mussetean sorrows.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.