Results found: 1

Search results

Search:
in the keywords: COMPUTATIONAL MODELS OF ARGUMENT

Sort By:

Limit search:

BUILDING BRIDGES BETWEEN EVERYDAY ARGUMENT AND FORMAL REPRESENTATIONS OF REASONING

100%

Debowska K., Lozinski P., Reed C.

Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric

2009

issue 16(29)

95-135

Argumentation theory, as a subdiscipline of philosophy, concentrates on the human expression of reasoning. It is an ancient area of research which has been enjoying a renaissance over the past thirty years or so with the development of two distinct theoretical branches: informal logic and pragma-dialectics. Both of these areas have influenced the development of mathematical and computational models of arguments that since the mid 90's has seen an explosion in research interest and output: with the area currently supporting two annual workshop series, a biennial conference series, a slew of journal special issues and, from 2010, its own dedicated journal. The links between the philosophical and formal ends of argumentation research, however, have been relatively sparse and ad hoc. This paper aims to build a bridge between the two areas that supports a more rigorous and extensive exchange of ideas and results to the benefit of both fields.

Refine search results

1 Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric

1 Debowska K.

1 Lozinski P.

1 Reed C.

1 2009

Search results

BUILDING BRIDGES BETWEEN EVERYDAY ARGUMENT AND FORMAL REPRESENTATIONS OF REASONING