Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Journals help

  1. 3 Filozofia (Philosophy)

Authors help

  1. 2 Šmajs J.

  2. 1 Timko M.

Years help

  1. 1 2018

  2. 1 2009

  3. 1 2008

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  EVOLUTIONARY ONTOLOGY
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

INTERDISCIPLINARITA A EVOLUČNÁ ONTOLÓGIA

100%
Timko M.
Filozofia (Philosophy)
|
2008
|
vol. 63
|
issue 4
318-323
EN
The article deals with the interdisciplinary character of evolutionary ontology. It shows the close interconnection between philosophy and the special sciences (in particular contemporary cosmology, non-equilibrium thermodynamics and evolutionary biology). The author considers also the prospects of the applied philosophy in solving the global ecological crisis.
2

K PODSTATĚ EVOLUČNÍ ONTOLOGIE

88%
Šmajs J.
Filozofia (Philosophy)
|
2009
|
vol. 64
|
issue 4
324-338
EN
The traditional conception of ontology as a theory of being included an unexpressed belief of that time, namely that an ontologically oriented philosophy has to be concerned either with the nonhuman being of nature, or with the human one conceived experientially. The critical ontology of Nicolai Hartmann came close to the evolutionary ontological conception in that it has incorporated the person in the reality and underlined the meanings of the course of events, time and multidimensionality of being. However, the subject in all traditional ontologies (including that of Hartmann) has been reduced, i.e. its structure has been conceived inadequately. They have ignored the different 'ontic' kind of reality, namely the 'human cultural being', which followed the birth of human beings on the planet Earth.
3

UZRÁL ČAS PRO BIOFILNÍ DUCHOVNÍ OBRAT?

88%
Šmajs J.
Filozofia (Philosophy)
|
2018
|
vol. 73
|
issue 1
14 – 23
EN
The author argues that two large modifications of human adaptive strategy have taken place in the course of our species’ history: 1. self-preserving modification at the beginning of the emergence of anatomically modern humans; 2. spiritual abandonment of live nature which occurred two thousand years before the end of Neolithic culture. The third modification, namely the turn from the predatory spiritual paradigm to the biophile paradigm, must be performed now. The author describes the latter in detail with regard to the natural sciences and the education system.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.