Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Journals help

  1. 2 Ius Novum

Authors help

  1. 2 Krajnik S.

Years help

  1. 2 2023

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  European Convention on Extradition
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Gloss on the judgement of the Supreme Court of 28 February 2023, I KZP 13/22 (expressing approval)

100%
Krajnik S.
Ius Novum
|
2023
|
vol. 17
|
issue 4 ENG
125-133
PL
The present gloss refers to the thesis and considerations expressed in the Supreme Court judgement of 28 February 2023, I KZP 13/22, concerning the exception to the rule of speciality stipulated in Article 14(1)(b) of the European Convention on Extradition. The author presents arguments concerning the broad international legal context of the analysed regulation, which develops and confirms the accuracy of the Supreme Court’s stance on a broader than lexical interpretation of the term ‘final discharge’. Moreover, the paper discusses the nature of the exception in question in the light of the standard of protection laid down in Article 52(4) of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Glosa do postanowienia Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 28 lutego 2023 r., I KZP 13/22 (aprobująca)

72%
Krajnik S.
Ius Novum
|
2023
|
vol. 17
|
issue 4
130-138
EN
The present gloss refers to the thesis and considerations expressed in the Supreme Court judgement of 28 February 2023, I KZP 13/22, concerning the exception to the rule of speciality stipulated in Article 14 par. 1 (b) European Convention on Extradition. The author presents arguments concerning the broad international legal context of the analysed regulation, which develops and confirms the accuracy of the Supreme Court’s stance on a broader than lexical interpretation of the term ‘final discharge’. Moreover, the paper discusses the nature of the exception in question in the light of the standard of protection laid down in Article 52 par. 4 Constitution of the Republic of Poland.
PL
Niniejsza glosa odnosi się do tezy oraz rozważań wyrażonych w postanowieniu Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 28 lutego 2023 r., I KZP 13/22, dotyczącym wyjątku od zasady specjalności unormowanym w art. 14 ust 1 lit. b Europejskiej konwencji o ekstradycji. Autor przedstawia argumentację dotyczącą szerokiego kontekstu prawno-międzynarodowego analizowanego unormowania, która rozwija i potwierdza trafność stanowiska Sądu Najwyższego co do szerszego niż leksykalne rozumienia pojęcia „ostatecznego zwolnienia”. Ponadto w publikacji odniesiono się do charakteru omawianego wyjątku w świetle standardu ochrony wyznaczanego przez art. 52 ust. 4 Konstytucji RP.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.