Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  GERMAN PHILOSOPHY
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
Filozofia (Philosophy)
|
2009
|
vol. 64
|
issue 6
584-591
EN
The paper focuses on the Enlightenment as an important object of the German tradition of philosophical-cultural researches and debates. It starts with an analysis of Kant's model of 'Aufklärung', underlining its social dimension. In Hegel's conception of the Enlightenment, the problem is approached critically and included in the process of the phenomenological-philosophical-historical development of mind. Hegel, unlike Kant, is historicizing, and thus narrowing the term of the enlightenment itself. In conclusion the author asks the question: Is it reasonable to see the real nature of the Enlightenment only in its fighting against mistakes, superstitions and prejudices?
EN
This article presents the genesis of hermeneutic pedagogy in German tradition. It was connected with the development of hermeneutics-oriented pedagogy in the form of German humanist pedagogy. This pedagogy already gained hermeneutic disposition in the first half of the 20th century. This gave rise to the emergence of hermeneutic pedagogy (hermeneutische Pädagogik) in the 50ties of the 20th century (W. Flitner, E. Weniger, O.F. Bollnow), and after another two decades – of pedagogic hermeneutics (pädagogische Hermeneutik). Hermeneutic pedagogy can be perceived as a methodological orientation the object of which is to determine the method, specific character and conditions of investigating the educational reality and as a theory of hermeneutical foundations of education.
Filozofia (Philosophy)
|
2009
|
vol. 64
|
issue 8
728-738
EN
Soren Kierkegaard is an author who, due to his creative use of genre, has been difficult to characterize straightforwardly. His unconventional form of writing has at times been understood as a part of his criticism of German speculative philosophy; however, little work has been done to actually understand the nature of his criticism and his precise objection to the form of presentation traditionally used by systematic philosophy. In this article it is argued that there is a close connection between the form and the content of speculative philosophy, and that due to his disagreements with the content of the latter (specifically concerning the question of faith) Kierkegaard was obliged to make use of a different literary form in order to criticize it.
Filozofia (Philosophy)
|
2012
|
vol. 67
|
issue 3
254 – 261
EN
The paper focuses on the influence of I. Kant and German classical philosophy on the Russian philosophical thought. It deals with the challenge of “returns to Kant” in Russian philosophical culture. Kant's philosophy stimulates the field of the metaphysics of faith. The paper shows that in their confrontation with German classical thought, and especially with Kant’s philosophy, Russian philosophers have various aims and use various methodologies and languages. Further, it shows Kant’ philosophical legacy from the two different points of view represented by two philosophical magazines – Logos and Put (Way). The paper also explains the importance of the notions of Kantianism and Neo-Kantianism in Russian philosophical thought from the 1850s up to the present day. Attention is paid in particular to A. I. Vvedensky and his understanding of the relationship between faith and reason as well as his confrontation with the philosophy of I. Kant.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.