Search results

1

Antypawłowa opozycja w Liście do Galatów

100%

Rakocy W.

The Biblical Annals

|

1997

|

vol. 44

|

issue 1

117-127

PL

Ziel des Artikels ist es, die Identität der Gegner des Paulus in den Kirchen Galatiens sowie der von ihnen verkündeten Thesen aufzuzeigen. Unbestritten ist, daß sie aus Kreisen judaisierender Judenchristen stammten. Sie waren mit dem paulinischen Evangelium nicht einverstanden und versuchten die Galater dazu zu bewegen, das jüdische Gesetz zu halten, denn erst dieses würde ihnen das Heil garantieren. Paulus, der entschieden gegen diese Auffassungen eintrat, hatte erkannt, daß dieser Streit das Wesen der christlichen Religion selbst betraf. Sein Brief stellt ein Zeugnis der Gefahr dar, die sich in die Kirchen Galatiens eingeschlichen hatte − eine völlige Mißachtung des Erlösungstodes Christi.

2

Donec formetur Christus in vobis (Ga 4,19). Od soteriologii ikonicznej do parenezy mimetycznej

67%

Sztuk D.

Seminare. Poszukiwania naukowe

|

2015

|

vol. 36

|

issue 2

21-29

EN

In reflection dedicated to the relations between theological arguments and parenesis in St. Paul’s epistolarium, there is a general agreement as to the fact that ethical exhortations are usually motivated by the doctrinal passages of the letters of the Apostle Paul, or, that they are woven into the argumentative substance of a given letter. Without denying this fact, it seems that the relationship between the two parts of the letters can be described in a different way. Namely, due to the fact that their doctrinal part presents the image of Christ and His work of salvation, we can characterize soteriology as iconic. This is possible because its agens is itself an icon. In other words, Paul’s Christology is iconic because Christ is the ‘image of God’ and, consequently, His work present in the cross, the sign of salvation, is also iconic. Soteriology remains related to the ethical part of the letters and, because St. Paul in different ways encourages his recipients to follow and to be like Christ, it will be justified to define his parenesis as mimetic.

3

Paul’s "Fullness of Time” (Gal 4:4) and "Fullness of Times” (Eph 1:10)

67%

Rambiert-Kwaśniewska A.

Verbum Vitae

|

2020

|

vol. 38

|

issue 1

EN

The expression “the fullness of time/times” is problematic because it was used for the first time in all of Greek literature by Paul, the Apostle to the Nations. A similar expression can be found only in certain papyri, where “the completion of times” was the expression used to call, among others, the end of a loan period. The only key to understanding the connotation of “the fullness of time/times” is an in-depth analysis of the immediate textual contexts of both Galatians 4:4 and Ephesians 1:10, the two places where this novelty is found. This article is an attempt to interpret the “fullness of time/times” in Galatians 4:4 and Ephesians 1:10 (with the addition of Mark 1:15). Our conclusion is that in Galatians 4:4 “the fullness of time” should be considered as “the end of the domination of Law.” As for Ephesians 1:10, there are multiple valid proposals for explaining “the fullness of times”, and we have not limited ourselves to any one in particular.

Refine search results

1 Seminare. Poszukiwania naukowe

1 The Biblical Annals

1 Verbum Vitae

1 Rakocy W.

1 Rambiert-Kwaśniewska A.

1 Sztuk D.

1 2020

1 2015

1 1997

Antypawłowa opozycja w Liście do Galatów

Donec formetur Christus in vobis (Ga 4,19). Od soteriologii ikonicznej do parenezy mimetycznej

Paul’s "Fullness of Time” (Gal 4:4) and "Fullness of Times” (Eph 1:10)