Search results

1

Antonio Gramsci’s role in Marxian thought and the contribution made to international relations by those using his ideas

100%

Malo E.

Academicus. International Scientific Journal

|

2013

|

issue 07

96-116

EN

Some of the most promising post-Cold War developments in Marxian thought have been stimulated by problems facing Marxists in Western Europe, to that extent they all seem to lay bare, intentionally or otherwise, the lacking of qualities, of Marx’s prediction. The most significant example of the failure of Marxist theory to be realised in practice is the persistent survival of the capitalist mode of production. The inevitable crisis foreseen by Marx, which would lead to revolution, failed to materialise and that claim is now itself historical, since capitalism has become the norm for social organisation in most of the world’s nations. By asking the question how capitalism can persist amid crisis, Gramsci, provided the most promising way of revision to the stunted Marxian orthodoxy. Today for us is important to ask whether Marxist analysis of neoliberal global strategy or globalisation and fragmentation invite reconsideration of the tendency on the part of many international relations scholarships to ignore and simply dismiss Marxism. It is also important to consider whether the significance of Marxist project of developing a critical approach to international politics, is but one way in which Marxism progressed beyond the traditional Anglo-American scholarship to IR.

2

Perennial Questions of Political Philosophy

100%

Moussaly O.

Dialogue and Universalism

|

2019

|

issue 1

85-104

EN

In the history of political thought a major problem has been to determine if philosophers should get involved in political affairs. From Aristotle to Antonio Gramsci, a wide variety of positions have been presented on this topic. Today academics often choose to isolate themselves in the ivory tower of the university. Although there are many exceptions to this general rule there is no consensus about how philosophers should relate to politics. We hope that this article which explores the relation of Aristotle to Machiavelli can shed some light on this very relevant issue.

3

La traduction et le fascisme : quelques réflexions à partir des théories de Croce et Gentile

100%

Agostini-Ouafi V.

Translationes

|

2015

|

vol. 7

|

issue 1

28-45

EN

This paper focuses on the vitality of the translation market in fascist Italy, despite the censorship affecting primarily Gramsci as a translator and theorist of translation, and, starting from the 1920 polemic between the idealist philosophers Croce and Gentile, it studies the theories emerging between the two world wars. The anti-fascist Croce denies the possibility of translating in the name of an aristocratic and romantic idea of art, and thus pushes critics in his camp, such as Debenedetti, to resort to different paths. Although Gentile claims to embody the fascist intellectual, his view on art is in contradiction with his view on power: subjective deconstruction and state authoritarianism, interpretive freedom and ideological violence coexist to the point where his reflections on translation get absurdly close to Benjamin’s.

4

„Uległość” Michaela Houellebecqa – marsz przez instytucje na opak

94%

Gralewicz A.

Seminare. Poszukiwania naukowe

|

2017

|

vol. 38

|

issue 2

49-58

PL

Celem artykułu jest przybliżenie afiliacji filozoficznych Uległości M. Houellebecqa – literackiego obrazu wojny kulturowej toczącej się między słabnącymi zwolennikami buntu metafizycznego (ateistyczny humanizm) oraz rosnącymi w siłę zwolennikami metafizycznej uległości (islam). Zdaniem M. Houellebecqua, wcześniej T.S. Eliota, jedynie narracja religijna jest skutecznym narzędziem kontroli społecznej. Autorka wyświetla analogie i różnice w projektach obu pisarzy. Podejmuje próbę uzasadnienia, dlaczego w M. Houellebecqa XXI-wiecznej wizji przyszłości, wbrew XX-wiecznej wizji T.S. Eliota, to islam, a nie chrześcijaństwo, może stać się naczelną zasadą organizującą życie zachodniego społeczeństwa.

EN

This article examines the philosophical affiliation of Submission by M. Houellebecq – a literary reflection of the cultural war being fought between the dwindling supporters of metaphysical rebellion (atheistic humanism) and increasing numbers of supporters of metaphysical submission (Islam). According to M. Houellebecq, who coincides with T.S. Eliot’s earlier views, only religious narration provides an effective tool of social control. The article attempts to explain why in the 21st century thesis put forward by Houellebecq (in opposition to the Eliot’s 20th century vision), it is Islam, not Christianity, that is to become the guiding principle for organizing life of Western society.

Refine search results

1 Academicus. International Scientific Journal

1 Dialogue and Universalism

1 Seminare. Poszukiwania naukowe

1 Translationes

1 Agostini-Ouafi V.

1 Gralewicz A.

1 Malo E.

1 Moussaly O.

1 2019

1 2017

1 2015

1 2013

Antonio Gramsci’s role in Marxian thought and the contribution made to international relations by those using his ideas

Perennial Questions of Political Philosophy

La traduction et le fascisme : quelques réflexions à partir des théories de Croce et Gentile

„Uległość” Michaela Houellebecqa – marsz przez instytucje na opak