Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Great Power Management (GPM)
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The aim of the article is to examine the foreign policy approaches and interests of three regional powers – Iran, Russia and Turkey before the Second Karabakh war in 2020. The study argues that dissatisfaction with the results of the conflict, forced these countries to further advance their interests in the region through cooperation and regional influence by soft power rather than waging an unpredictable geopolitical confrontation. The study is based on the methods of foreign policy analysis and comparative analysis of political discourse of the three regional powers in application to the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict using the Great Power Management (GPM) approach of the English School of International Relations. The study puts forward the idea that the predominance of the national interests of Russia, Turkey and Iran, disguised with ideational concepts in the framework of the GPM is fundamentally different from the principles of multilateralism, driven by the European Union and the West within the liberal paradigm of resolving the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.
PL
Celem artykułu jest zbadanie interesów i podejść w polityce zagranicznej trzech mocarstw regionalnych – Iranu, Rosji i Turcji na tle konfliktu w Górskim Karabachu w 2020 roku. W badaniu autor weryfikuje tezę, że w efekcie konfliktu ww. państwa zmieniły metody realizacji swoich interesów w regionie na współpracę opartą o instrumenty soft power. Tym samym odeszły od prowadzenia nieprzewidywalnej konfrontacji geopolitycznej. Badanie opiera się na metodach analizy polityki zagranicznej i analizy porównawczej dyskursu politycznego trzech mocarstw regionalnych w zastosowaniu do konfliktu w Górskim Karabachu z wykorzystaniem podejścia Great Power Management (GPM) angielskiej szkoły stosunków międzynarodowych. Autor dochodzi do wniosku, że dominacja interesów narodowych Rosji, Turcji i Iranu, zamaskowana ideowymi koncepcjami w ramach GPM, zasadniczo różni się od zasad multilateralizmu, którymi kieruje się Unia Europejska w ramach liberalnego paradygmatu rozwiązywania konfliktu w Górskim Karabachu.
EN
The aim of the article is to examine the foreign policy approaches and interests of three regional powers – Iran, Russia and Turkey before the Second Karabakh war in 2020. The study argues that dissatisfaction with the results of the conflict, forced these countries to further advance their interests in the region through cooperation and regional influence by soft power rather than waging an unpredictable geopolitical confrontation. The study is based on the methods of foreign policy analysis and comparative analysis of political discourse of the three regional powers in application to the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict using the Great Power Management (GPM) approach of the English School of International Relations. The study puts forward the idea that the predominance of the national interests of Russia, Turkey and Iran, disguised with ideational concepts in the framework of the GPM is fundamentally different from the principles of multilateralism, driven by the European Union and the West within the liberal paradigm of resolving the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.