Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  INTERNATIONAL INTEGRATION
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

CENTER FOR FUNDAMENTAL EDUCATION AT M.M. BOGOLYUBOV INSTITUTE FOR THEORETICAL PHYSICS OF THE NAS OF UKRAINE: A MODEL FOR INTEGRATION OF ACADEMY SCIENCE AND UNIVERSITY EDUCATION

100%
Shadura V., Iorgov M.
Nauka ta naukoznavstvo (Science and Science of Science)
|
2008
|
issue 2
100-104
EN
A conceptual framework for the center of fundamental education is discussed in view of the already existing experience of the Research and Education Center at M.M. Bogolyubov Institute for Theoretical Physics, created five years ago as an affiliated division of the Institute, and operating on the voluntary basis. This Center offers a basic model for the center of fundamental education, allowing integration between research and education. Such center for fundamental education should aim to guarantee continual education for talented youth in the three phases: school (phys.-math. lyceums), university (students of natural science departments), post-graduate (universities and academy institutes). Staff of the center should include university lecturers, researchers from national academy institutes and abroad, school teachers of physics and mathematics, post-graduates and university graduates. A key recruitment criterion should be engagement in research. To be recruited, university and Academy researchers have to submit joint competitive research projects that can also involve other claimants for positions. About 60% of researchers involved in a project should be recruited full time. Students of the center can be Ukrainians and foreigners who could pass exams on theoretical disciplines. At the same time, they should remain to be students of their HEEs. After graduation of the center (master degree) students get recommendation for post-graduate course. The center should be administered by the research council (distinguished Ukrainian and Western scientists), the executive council (representatives from university departments and Academy institutes which researchers are recruited by the center, and from Ukrainian and foreign sponsors) and the executive director (elected from among the research staff for one year).
2

Economic Integration within the EU and the Relations with the Countries of CIS

100%
Plowiec D.
Ekonomista
|
2005
|
issue 4
483-500
EN
The desire to wipe away the post Yalta divides was behind the integrational processes between the countries of Western and Central Europe. Other motives could be attributed to the strengthening of peace and stability of the Eastern frontier of the Union as well as to the widening of the single European market. Concurrently the European Communities were developing their relations with many member countries of the CIS, especially with the Russian Federation. Political changes in the Ukraine have led to the acceleration and extension of efforts to strengthen her ties with the EU while strategic character of relations with Russia has been maintained. The process of adjustment of the Ukraine to the membership in EU would, however, take a long time and can be carried out provided that Union's foreign policy is strengthened (what has been assumed in the Constitutional Treaty). Key words: international integration, EU relations with countries of CIS, the Ukraine's international orientation
3

O SÚDNOM DVORE EURÁZIJSKEJ HOSPODÁRSKEJ ÚNIE: POSTAVENIE, KONANIE A PRÍNOS

75%
Mareček L.
Právny obzor. Teoretický časopis pre otázky štátu a práva (Juridical Review. Theoretical journal for the questions of state and law)
|
2021
|
vol. 104
|
issue 3
247 – 264
EN
The Court of Justice is the judicial body of the institutional system of the Eurasian Economic Union. The Union is a regional economic organisation that was founded in 2015. Its existence links to the existence of previous economic constellations in the region – the Eurasian Economic Community (2000), Eurasian Customs Union (2010) or Eurasian Economic Space (2013). The executive centre of the Union is Moscow. It consists of five states of which the Russian federation, economically speaking, is the most influential. In the Union, integration at the executive level plays a dominant role. About the Court of Justice, there may be concerns that its independence will be sufficiently ensured. The “reform” of 2015 does not solve the problem but only weakens its competences, e.g. removal of the preliminary ruling procedure. The decision-making activity of the Court of Justice is less intense than that of its counterpart in the European Union. From a qualitative point of view, in some moments we can see signs of his judicial activism. In principle, however, his decision-making activity does not yet lead to conclusions that we could call “ground-breaking.” In its work, it builds on its decision-making work before the Court of Justice of the Eurasian Community. It is possible to emphasize the formulation of the principle of direct application and the primacy of Union law or the principle of the concurrent primacy of the competence of the Union institutions in the event of their conflict with the competence of a national authority. The Court also formulated the autonomy of the Union law principle. Proceedings before the Court starts based on an initiative of a subject and can be divided into disputes and interpretations (which are consultative). Dispute proceedings must be preceded by an attempt to an out-of-court settlement. The active legitimate subjects are the Member States and the so-called business. At the level of the business entity, it is proving to be giving the individual wider access to transnational judicial protection than in EU conditions. The Union institutions do not have such a possibility. However, these have an impact on the Court’s work in terms of its control, creation or enforcement. This is mainly because the Court of Justice cannot overturn existing rules (regional, national) or authoritatively determine how its decisions are to be enforced.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.