Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Jan Neruda
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

Neruda redaktor Josefa Baráka?  : sonda do Nerudovy redakční praxe především na příkladu Adolfa Heyduka

100%
Kosák M.
Česká literatura (Czech Literature)
|
2020
|
vol. 68
|
issue 1
65-74
EN
The text sets out to examine the hypothesis that Jan Neruda had a hand in the editorship or authorship of poems signed by Josef Barák, thus examining the conclusion of the study by Petr Plecháč and Jiří Flaišman: “Barák’s problem: Neruda from the standpoint of contemporary stylometry” (Česká literatura No. 5/2017), who deduced that there was a textual similarity between the two authors and attempted to explain it in terms of the theory that Jan Neruda was involved in editing or co-authoring his work. The present text analyses Jan Neruda’s editing practice during the 1859–1860 period on the basis of a comparison of newly discovered manuscripts of poems by A. Heyduk, V. A. Crha, E. B. Kaizl and J. V. Jahn with printed material in publications edited by Neruda, particularly in the first annual volume of the journal Obrazy života (Images of Life, 1859) and in the book edition of Heyduk’s Básně (Poems, 1859). On the basis of this analysis and the critical determination of constraints emerging from the available archive material under analysis, the author characterizes Jan Neruda’s editorial work, concluding that it does not form a basis for the hypothesis that Neruda made decisive alterations to the text of the poems by Josef Barák resulting in a change in stylometric indicators.
CS
Text si klade za cíl prozkoumat hypotézu o redakčním či autorském podílu Jana Nerudy na básních podepsaných Josefem Barákem. Prověřuje tak závěr studie Petra Plecháče a Jiřího Flaišmana „Problém Barák: Neruda z pohledu současné stylometrie“ (Česká literatura č. 5/2017), kteří dospěli k závěru o textové podobnosti obou autorů a pokusili se ji vysvětlit hypotézou o redakčním či spoluautorském podílu Jana Nerudy. Přítomný text analyzuje redakční praxi Jana Nerudy v daném období let 1859‒1860 na základě srovnání nově nalezených rukopisů básní A. Heyduka, V. A. Crhy, E. B. Kaizla a J. V. Jahna s otisky v publikacích, na nichž se Jan Neruda podílel jako redaktor, především v prvním ročníku časopisu Obrazy života (1859) a v knižním vydání Básní A. Heyduka (1859). Na základě tohoto rozboru a po kritickém stanovení omezení vyplývajících z analyzovaného dostupného archivního materiálu dochází autor k charakteristice redakční práce Jana Nerudy, a vyslovuje závěr, že není podklad pro hypotézu o Nerudových razantních změnách textu básní Josefa Baráka, které by měly za následek proměnu stylometrických ukazatelů.
2
Content available remote

"Jméno to působilo na mne odjakživa zvláštním kouzlem" - metajazykový pohled na propria v publicistice čtyř českých spisovatelů

80%
Reclik A.
Acta onomastica
|
2023
|
vol. 64
|
issue 2
372-387
EN
The study focuses on the use of proper names in the articles of four Czech writers: Jan Neruda (1834–1891), Svatopluk Čech (1846–1908), Karel Čapek (1890–1938), and Karel Poláček (1892–1945), who reflected not only Czech culture and society, but also the Czech language. Given their avid interest in linguistics, the aim of this paper is to analyze the authors’ linguistic takes on proper names as reflected in their art journalism (essays, feuilletons, and columns). The present analysis focuses on their opinions of, for instance, naming of public spaces, personal names (and whether they use them stereotypically), misuse of proper names in politics, and naming in advertising. Their attitudes towards the naming strategy (seen as a linguistic strategy) are always examined in the context of the dominating linguistic views of the given period (the views on the language norms in particular), from approximately the 1850s until the 1930s. This approach, combined with a literary-cultural one, allows us to cover the issue comprehensively. The study is based on the chapter of the forthcoming dissertation Language and linguistic issues and their reflection in the works of selected Czech writers.
3
Content available remote

Kognitivní a percepční perspektiva ve vybraných prózách Jana Nerudy a Jakuba Arbesa a jejich funkční korelace:

80%
Změlík R.
Česká literatura (Czech Literature)
|
2020
|
vol. 68
|
issue 4
438-467
EN
The present work focuses on two types of narrative perspective — cognitive and perceptual. The cognitive perspective is understood to comprise the ways in which the fictional world can be mentally conceptualized from the standpoint of the characters, or such a perspective is a manifestation of collective opinion, which of course is not the subject of this work. The perceptual perspective is understood to comprise sensual perception, through which the phenomena or events of the fictional world are filtered. Based on Wolf Schmid’s conceptualization, we distinguish two basic aspects of narrative perspective, the first being the way evens are perceived or understood, while the second is the way they are represented and realized within the narrative. Another essential feature is the function of both perspectives, which manifests itself not only in terms of what is filtered by these perspectives and what is reflected in the semantics but also reciprocally. It is then our primary task to follow the way both perspectives functionally determine each other. We perform an analysis of this phenomenon on the corpus of Jan Neruda’s and Jakub Arbes’s prose works, which were written at around the same time. Firstly we show how the identified types of perspective are realized in the prose works of both authors, who each represent a differing realist school in Czech literature. We then focus on their functional correlations and find that Neruda’s prose work is characterized more by situations in which a cognitive perspective on a rationally modal basis determines the perceptual perspective, so that sense perceptions or illusions are corrected by the rational cognitive framework, whereas in the case of Arbes’s prose works under review, the reverse is for the most part the case. The typologically different functional correlation method of both perspectives is manifested in the sphere of diegesis, narrative strategy and composition, as well as in the conception of the fictional time-space, for example. Just as the usage of the perspective type or of the functional correlations does not necessarily determine the narrative composition, nor does it necessarily relate to the overall general orientation of the work on the Romanticism-Realism axis. However, its individual segments (setting and characters) determined by the functional polarity of both perspectives may refer to one of these literary mainstreams of the period.
4
Content available remote

Zapadlá cesta za polskou revolucí

71%
Pfaff I.
Slovanský přehled: historická revue pro dějiny střední, východní a jihovýchodní Evropy (Slavonic Review: Review for Central, Eastern and Southeastern European history)
|
2013
|
vol. 99
|
issue 1-2
15-52
EN
The goal of this study is to identify one of the most distinctive and progressive intellectual and political powers in the Czech society of the 19th century, the tradition of revolutionary Polonophilia, using the example of the relations of some Czech intellectuals with agents of the Polish Uprising in the 1863–1864. Attention is particularly focused on the activities of the prominent Czech writer Jan Neruda. The study places them into the wider context of the period, and at the same time draws attention to the state of, and values expressed in Czech Polonophilic studies targeting the history of the 19th century.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.