Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Kyrgyzstan,
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
Protests in the postsoviet republics and, very recently, in Middle East and North African countries have focused attention again on the subject of the revolution. This paper is interested in events which happened in Kyrygyzstan in March 2005 commonly labeled as “the tulip revolution”. However, the aim of the article is not to provide objective depiction of the events or the answer the question what really was “the Tulip revolution”. Instead, it seeks to reveal the mechanisms of the interpretation and discursive construction of the events of March 2005 in the acts of public communication addressed to the people by the major beneficiary of these events, the incumbent president Kurmanbek Bakiev.
EN
The purpose of the article is to present the status of secret services in the system of national authorities in Kyrgyzstan. The authors have attempted to present the basic functions of national security system, competences of national security authorities and status of officers and soldiers serving in the special forces of the Kyrgyz Republic. The tasks and powers granted to the State National Security Committee and Main Intelligence Directorate are extensive. Social control and judicial review are highly limited. The politicization of national security authorities and a high degree of corruption block their proper functioning.
EN
This article explains why Kyrgyzstan switched to parliamentarian form of semipresidential system in 2010 and examines new rules of government formation. An analysis is focused on emergence and functioning of coalition governments of parliamentary majority in 2010–2016, an unique phenomenon in post- Soviet Central Asia republic and rare form of government in the CIS countries. Considering strong and weak points of Kirgizstan’s experience with parliamentary cabinet’s author examines whether the new system of government will survive the accession of the country to the Eurasian Economic Union and the second electoral cycle of 2015–2017. Although the outcome of the parliamentary elections of 2015 has been positive in this respect, the presidential elections of 2017 will provide a crucial challenge for maintaining the constitutional model of 2010 unchanged, as an analysis of political discourse of 2016 suggests. Author reveals the real dilemma of incumbent and draw potential scenarios of future development, including a new revision of fundamental law.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.