Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  LITURGICAL REFORM
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

Viatikum v reformě 2. vatikánského koncilu*

100%
Bugel W.
Studia theologica
|
2006
|
vol. 8
|
issue 2
16-24
EN
The paper shows progress of the rite of Viaticum in the Roman liturgy from the ancient Christian centuries to the time of convening the Second Vatican Council. Then it concentrates on the proposals of liturgical reform of the Conciliar preparatory commission and on the suggestions on this matter from the Conciliar liturgical commission. In its third part, it undertakes the question of the preparation of the new rite of giving Viaticum and finally, it presents the outcome of this component of liturgical reform.
2

VZŤAH TEOLÓGIE A LITURGIE V DIELE C. VAGAGGINIHO A S. MARSILIHO (II. ČASŤ)

88%
Zvara P.
Verba Theologica. Teologický časopis
|
2016
|
vol. 15
|
issue 2
27 – 40
EN
Salvatore Marsili was a Benedictine monk, professor of liturgy, and editor of the oldest liturgical Italian magazine La Rivista Liturgica for a long time. Cipriano Vagaggini, though not a member of the liturgical movement, contributed significantly to a deeper knowledge of liturgy through his works. He also was a Benedictine monk, professor of dogmatic and Eastern theology, and systematic theologian. Both lived in Benedictine communities, occupied by teaching theology and researching various theological and liturgical questions. The issue of the relationship of theology and liturgy as well as that of the inclusion of liturgical studies into the structure of a complex theological research was of crucial importance for them. Both developed integrated concepts which are still inspiring and motivating for theologians and liturgists. Their research has opened new horizons in the field of theology and liturgy, and raised a number of issues that have become the subject of further research. Both showed keen interest in other, more practical areas of liturgy. Their work has produced fruitful results for the current liturgical practice of the Church in several areas. The article analyzes some areas of the scientific work of these two authors in order to highlight their merit in the field of theological and liturgical exploration. It also offers a specific basis for further research of their works.
3
Content available remote

VÝZNAM OBŘADU ŽEHNÁNÍ MATKY PO PORODU

88%
Vlčková M.
Studia theologica
|
2013
|
vol. 15
|
issue 1
36–46
EN
This work deals with the significance of the ceremony of blessing the mother after birth. It focuses primarily on the liturgical ceremony of blessing the mother, its development in history and its significance in liturgical-theological and socio-cultural terms. The concept of blessing the mother is used here as a term including both the ceremony known as introduction to confinement – introductio mulieris post partum, (or benedictio mulieris post partum), the history of which reaches back to the liturgy of the Catholic church in the 11th century and ends with the Second Vatican Council, and the forms of blessing the mother revived as part of the liturgical reform of the Second Vatican Council; the blessing prayer at the end of the baptismal ceremonies for the baptism of the child and Ordo benedictionis mulieris post partum in accordance with the new Benedictional (1984). The work is concluded by a reflection on the present and future practice of blessing the mother.
4

VZŤAH TEOLÓGIE A LITURGIE V DIELE C. VAGAGGINIHO A S. MARSILIHO

75%
Zvara P.
Verba Theologica. Teologický časopis
|
2016
|
vol. 15
|
issue 1
50 – 65
EN
Salvatore Marsili was a Benedictine monk, professor of liturgy, and editor of the oldest liturgical Italian magazine La Rivista Liturgica for a long time. Cipriano Vagaggini, though not a member of the liturgical movement, contributed significantly to a deeper knowledge of liturgy through his works. He was also a Benedictine monk, professor of dogmatic and Eastern theology, and systematic theologian. Both lived in Benedictine communities, occupied by teaching theology and researching various theological and liturgical questions. The issue of the relationship of theology and liturgy as well as that of the inclusion of liturgical studies into the structure of a complex theological research was of crucial importance for them. Both developed integrated concepts which are still inspiring and motivating for theologians and liturgists. Their research has opened new horizons in the field of theology and liturgy, and raised a number of issues that have become the subject of further research. Both showed keen interest in other, more practical areas of liturgy. Their work has produced fruitful results for the current liturgical practice of the Church in several areas. The article analyses some areas of the scientific work of these two authors in order to highlight their merit in the field of theological and liturgical exploration. It offers also a specific basis for further research of their works.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.