Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The article presents postulates of non-fundamentalist manner of conducting management sciences. This means the necessity of adopting pluralist principles of scientific discourse with the consideration of many social, economic, technical and natural sciences. Broadening of the reflectiveness of the discipline and of critical trends of the management practice analysis as well as departing from universalism towards relativism are suggested.
EN
The thesis of this paper is that legacy and approach of the Polish Praxiological School determine promising material to develop praxiology as metatheory for management sciences. The idea of developing praxiology as metatheory for management sciences is advanced and long-term research project (in text the author groups its problems in seven, correlated areas). Comparative analyses of subject literature allows the author to submit a proposition that, basic theorems of praxiology, i.e. practical directives (both as logical and normative sentences) are similar in many ways to organization theory theorems. Therefore, he thinks, that with help of certain theoretical interventions, one can use (and develop) praxiology and metapraxiology to work out some of the management sciences metatheoretical problems. These problems are, e.g. structural chaos and ambiguity of basic management sciences terminology. The author focuses his attention on: 1) designing of praxiological systematization of management sciences, and 2) application of idea of praxiological efficaciousness to solving the ambiguity problem of basic management sciences terminology (shown on the example of effectiveness term).
EN
One of important theoretical aspects of management science is epistemic arrangement. The paper presents a consistent concept of a partial ordering of different aspects of the management science based on the principles of demarcation of philosophy of science introduced by Kuhn, Lakatos and Laudan. The proposed 'representative paradigm' allows to exclude all problems transferrable onto formal computer languages. For such a specific range of problems the author demonstrated the applicability of the scientific method principles and the 'good paradigm' concept. Introduced division of problems meet the criterion of Laudan's rationality of demarcation in science. The logical layout for the 'selective demarcation' of management science is the perfect tool, leading to the construction of a better described and consistent structures of the epistemic arrangement.
EN
The article presents, in chronological order, the dominant directives and reflections on the organisation of work, management, decision-making, effective functioning, leadership, strategies, quality and accountancy in the Middle Ages and Renaissance. The topic is introduced with a discussion of the forms of organising collective work and how issues of quality were approached in these two epochs. This is followed by an overview of Arab thought on strategy and the functioning of organ isations as well as European thought and literature on organisation and management. The author discusses why management science could not have developed without scientific research methods. The paper ends with a look at Poland’s contribution to the development of organisation and management in the two periods.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.