Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Journals help

  1. 1 Filozofia (Philosophy)

Authors help

  1. 1 Buráň J.

Years help

  1. 1 2020

Results found: 1

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  MORAL RELATIVISM
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

PROČ CHÁPAT POPPERŮV KRITICKÝ DUALISMUS DECISIONISTICKY

100%
Buráň J.
Filozofia (Philosophy)
|
2020
|
vol. 75
|
issue 6
474 – 489
EN
There is not much in the open society to suggest that Karl Popper was a moral objectivist. Yet, that is exactly what he himself claimed later in life. Was the widespread “decisionistic” reading of the open society just a grand misunderstanding, or did Popper change his meta-ethical views without acknowledging it? I give reasons as to why we should hold the latter to be true. I also argue that even were the former the case, decisionism would still be more compatible with the open society ideal.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.