Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  NATURAL PHILOSOPHY
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

PARADOXY JÁNA ČAPLOVIČA ALEBO O JEDNOM SPÔSOBE MARGINALIZÁCIE

100%
Mészáros O.
Filozofia (Philosophy)
|
2006
|
vol. 61
|
issue 10
827-837
EN
The paper deals with the process of marginalizing of Ján Caplovic, a Slovak Enlightenment writer and defender of the Slovak national concerns, in the Hungarian culture of the 1st half of the 19th century. It examines the so called 'Caplovic's paradoxes', with the help of which Caplovic ironized the natural right, natural philosophy, national philosophy and historiography from the perspective of the rationality of the natural sciences. The author points out to the dominating narrative of the reform period (embodied in views such as those of G. Szontagh), which excluded Caplovic's interpretation of the problems concerned. This process took place on the background of so called 'philosophy of harmony' with its pretension to play the role of the national philosophy.
2

NATURAL PHILOSOPHY IN VIKTOR ASTAFEV'S WORKS

100%
Rudziewicz I.
Slavia Orientalis
|
2007
|
vol. 56
|
issue 3
379-385
EN
The article emphasises eco-philosophical elements in the prose of the contemporary Russian writer Viktor Astafev. Special attention is paid to the manifold interrelations between nature and people in the selected fragments concerning human life and its eternal relationship with nature. Furthermore, the article determines the role, significance and place of education, ethics, consciousness and ecological attitude in mankind's contemporary contacts with the world of nature.
3

MORÁLNA ISTOTA V LEIBNIZOVEJ PRÍRODNEJ FILOZOFII

100%
Rey A.-L.
Filozofia (Philosophy)
|
2018
|
vol. 73
|
issue 7
520 – 528
EN
Where does the uncertainty of our knowledge of natural world come from? Does our knowledge turn more reliable after our acceptance of the need of the mathematization of nature and formalization of the experiment results? Is there between the above mentioned poles (i.e. uncertainty vs. unquestionable knowledge built after the model of the mathematization of the experiment results) any other epistemic space which made the guaranteed certainty in physics possible? Should this certainty be conceived – on the background of the absolute or metaphysical certainty – as insufficient, or as an application of the mathematical model? Leibniz stands for the idea that the high probability of moral certainty could reach the truth of the latter. The aim of the paper is to analyse this very probability logic with attention paid to making use of it in natural philosophy.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.