Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  POLEMIC
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

How to Escape from Sartre?

100%
Kozlowski M.
Przegląd Filozoficzny. Nowa Seria
|
2005
|
vol. 14
|
issue 4(56)
179-185
EN
Although until the late 60's Jean-Paul Sartre enjoyed the reputation of a 'total intellectual', his authority was often challenged. As it happened, he was in permanently conflict with nearly everyone who had formerly been his ally. For a long time, however, Sartre managed to choose the battle ground and the arms that were used in the confrontations. This situation changed when in 1966 Michel Foucault published 'The order of things'. All of a sudden it looked like Michel Foucault could eclipse the aging master. But pushing Sartre to the sidelines was not an easy task, as Foucault shortly discovered. In the first place, it was not his intention to diminish Sartre's authority. Secondly, Foucault quickly realized that he was not engaging himself in a direct polemic with Sartre as a philosopher, but he was opposing Sartre as an intellectual institution. This implied for Foucault that he had to seek some reconciliation with Sartre as a philosopher in order to oppose his more effectively as an institution. He noticed that a head-on opposition to Sartre would force him to enter in the debate on terms dictated by Sartre. So a subtle shift of themes and employment of new methods of argument were a better strategy for Foucault. He used it and tried to avoid a direct confrontation.
2

POLEMIKA O ANJELSKÝCH ZEMIACH AKO LITERÁRNOHISTORICKÝ PROBLÉM

88%
Matejovič P.
Slovenská literatúra (Slovak Literature)
|
2013
|
vol. 60
|
issue 5
359 – 370
EN
The subject of the study is an analysis of historiographic position of Jozef Felix´s article published in 1946 O nové cesty v próze alebo problém „anjelských zemí“ v našej literatúre (After New Ways in Prose or the Issue of „Angel Lands“ in Our Literature) and the polemic it caused at that time. The author focuses on revealing the reasons which allowed Slovak Marxist literary historiography to label Felix´s article as the starting point when Slovak after-war prose „definitely leant towards“ Socialist Realism. The author opposes this literary-historical construct by claiming that Felix´s article and the related polemic were a part of the argument about what is modern in the Slovak literature in 1946, and not a part of the argument between the Modern Slovak literature and the Literature of Socialist Realism. The latter argument arose only subsequently and it was prompted by the political situation in Czechoslovakia in 1948.
3

SPOR O MILOVANIE V HUSEJ KOŽI M. VÁLKA

75%
Matejov F.
Slovenská literatúra (Slovak Literature)
|
2013
|
vol. 60
|
issue 5
386 – 396
EN
The article deals with the argument over Milovanie v husej koži (Lovemaking with goose pimples on) by Miroslav Válek. The collection of poems published in 1965 became in 1966 the subject of the argument between M. Hamada and S. Šmatlák. M. Červenka of the Czech side got involved in it as well. The presented text reconstructs it as a chiasmus of poetry and criticism, structuralism-inspired analysis and interpretation of a poetic text and its radicalizing, existentially appealing finalization of the thinking process. The protagonist of the polemic M. Hamada deliberately situated it on the boundary between literary and moral-critical social debates. What M. Hamada vehemently identified in Válek´s „fourth book of restlessness“ was Nihilism and related amorphous, fragmentary, and cliché lyric messages. The other participant of the argument S. Šmatlák defended M. Válek in the name of everlasting Humanism including the negative moments of the human and the world using. The argument is contextualized in the article as an argument over moderating the form of the poetry in the 1960s (on the one hand analytical unmasking of the human situation and on the other hand his cathartic poetic saviour), the nature of criticism (work at the service of the text as opposed to the efforts to autonomously reflect on literature and the state of the world), as the confrontation between the traditional and ideological reflections of Humanism and the related contemporary issues (the philosophy of existence, M. Heidegger, Structuralism of the 1960s, literature itself ranging from S. Beckett to J.-P. Sartre). The argument anticipated the schism of Slovak literature in the 1970s and 1980s, namely Šmatlák´s ideological viewpoints in the 1970s and 1980s and Hamada´s moralizing gestures as of the 1990s. The article records the impact of the argument on the interpretations of poetic texts in Slovak writing about poetry, its methodical dimensions as well as the still open issues of reading Válek´s poetry itself. Finally, it takes notice of potential connections with F. Halas´s poetry updated from the mid-1950s.
4

PRECISE OR IMPRECISE? PROBLEM OF THE DEFINITION OF LEXEME FROM THE POINT OF THE ANTHROPOCENTRICALLY THEORY OF LANGUAGES (Scharf oder unscharf? - Zu Problemen der Lexemdefinition aus der Sicht der anthropozentrischen Sprachentheorie)

75%
Pawlowski G.
Kwartalnik Neofilologiczny
|
2010
|
vol. 57
|
issue 3
319-333
EN
The article examines problems concerning the description of lexemes, their definitions and real or hypothetical limits that may result from questions presented in this context. The author discusses such distinctions as the meaning of a word as opposed to its use and the proper meaning of a word versus the so called additional meaning of a given expression. As a consequence, one of the most important tasks comes down to answering the question of what constitutes the idiolectal meaning and what factors have an influence on this process
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.