Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Journals help

  1. 1 Filozofia (Philosophy)

Authors help

  1. 1 Taliga M.

Years help

  1. 1 2016

Results found: 1

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  POPPER’S FALSIFIABILITY
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

JE POPPEROVA FALZIFIKOVATEĽNOSŤ KRITÉRIOM DEMARKÁCIE?

100%
Taliga M.
Filozofia (Philosophy)
|
2016
|
vol. 71
|
issue 8
644 – 655
EN
The paper highlights Popper’s falsifiability as the demarcation criterion neither of science nor of empirical science, but of empirical content. The difference is of utmost importance for several reasons. First, it shows that the most widespread criticisms of Popper’s criterion are misguided. Second, it sheds new light on the relations between being empirical and being scientific. Third, it explains what still remains typical of empiricism after it has been purged from the three dogmas as described by Quine and Davidson. The paper elaborates on all the three points.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.