Search results

1

Nomos i Ho Nomos w listach Pawłowych

100%

Rakocy W.

The Biblical Annals

|

2011

|

vol. 1

|

issue 1

165-182

EN

At least since Origen there has been discussion how to understand in Paul's Epistles an articular and anarthrous form of nomos in relation to the Mosaic law. The consensus is that no firm rule can be established on the basis of the article's presence or absence. In this paper we indicated some trends in using and omitting the article. Context still remains a very important guide but our contribution consists in paying attention to the so-called Oral Tradition. In this way some unsolved cases can be explained.

2

Wątki filozoficzne w Liście Arysteasza do Filokratesa

100%

Baran G. M.

Roczniki Kulturoznawcze

|

2023

|

vol. 14

|

issue 4

49-79

EN

Analyzing the content of the Letter of Aristeas to Philocrates, one can notice that it contains many philosophical threads. First of all, the description of the Mosaic Law as “very philosophical” deserves particular attention. The author of the Letter showed that the Law is in no way inferior to the Greek philosophical tradition, because, like Greek philosophy, the Law gives the possibility of achieving virtue. Hence, a person who studies the Law, who knows its content, and is guided by its norms is a noble man who fully deserves to be called a philosopher. Studying the Law, being guided by it, therefore, means practicing philosophy. The proprium that resounds in the Letter is a constant reference to God of the Old Testament as the source of all good and a “norm” of its kind.

PL

Analizując treść Listu Arysteasza do Filokratesa, można zauważyć, że zawiera on wiele wątków filozoficznych. Przede wszystkim na uwagę zasługuje określenie Prawa Mojżeszowego jako „wysoce filozoficzne”. Autor Listu wykazał, że w niczym nie ustępuje ono greckiej tradycji filozoficznej, gdyż podobnie jak grecka filozofia, tak i Prawo daje możliwość osiągnięcia cnoty. Stąd zgłębiający Prawo, znający jego treść, kierujący się jego wskazaniami to człowiek szlachetny, który w pełni zasługuje na miano filozofa. Studiowanie Prawa, kierowanie się nim oznacza zatem uprawnianie filozofii. Proprium, które wybrzmiewa z Listu, to stałe odwoływanie się do Boga Starego Testamentu jako źródła wszelkiego dobra i swego rodzaju „normy”.

3

Prawo wiary czy uczynki prawa? Dylemat pierwszych chrześcijan w "Commentarium in Epistulam ad Romanos" Orygenesa

80%

Duda J.

Vox Patrum

|

2014

|

vol. 61

283-295

EN

One of the most crucial problems that split the newly developing Church was the argumentation between the baptized Jews, the Christians deriving from pagans and Gnostics mainly concerned the issue of respecting Moses Law and connected with it circumcision. That problem was deeply analyzed in the preaching of one of the most prominent Early-Christian writers and Church exegetes Origen (around 253 AD). Origen stressed that both the law of faith as well as Moses Law are strictly connected with God’s Law, which every human should respect in order to reach salvation. And neither the deeds of natural law nor Moses Law have the justification power, since this is actually given directly from Christ via our faith and christening. So humans receive the remission of sins and blessing on the basis of faith, and it is the faith that contributes to salvation. Humans, who have been given salvation, are obliged to respect the law faith in their life, which concerns all Christ’s disciples. And that should be manifested by fasting, mercy, penance, seeking wisdom, etc. We can state though that the law of faith, being God’s gift, is fundamental in a Christian’s life, and the reflection of that is justice and sainthood.

Refine search results

1 Roczniki Kulturoznawcze

1 The Biblical Annals

1 Vox Patrum

1 Baran G. M.

1 Duda J.

1 Rakocy W.

1 2023

1 2014

1 2011

Nomos i Ho Nomos w listach Pawłowych

Wątki filozoficzne w Liście Arysteasza do Filokratesa

Prawo wiary czy uczynki prawa? Dylemat pierwszych chrześcijan w "Commentarium in Epistulam ad Romanos" Orygenesa