Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  SPECIES
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
Coming conclusions from this study are inducing to formulating the statement, that leading of next controlled and thought reintroductions programs and protections of the Glis glis kind in Poland is necessary. Also conducting accurate examinations and the monitoring of the population of the edible dormouse should be a big challenge. It is also necessary raising qualifications of the employees of National Forests responsible for the protection of kinds and conducting the environmental education of the society which will be aimed at demonstrating, easily it is possible to protect the edible dormouse and how it is important for her more further existing in Polish forests. Without the practical protection of natural settlements of the edible dormouse regulations legislative, guaranteeing her the protection (Bern Convention, entry to the IUCN list, Polish acts and regulations) aren’t playing a significant role. The edible dormouse is happening to make its way oneself with the very powerful enemy, with which unfortunately he isn’t having a chance to the win – with man. The man is just transforming the environment of Glis glis spicies depriving him of settlements, foods, hunting it, but simultaneously the man is passing attempts of the protection and programs of the reintroduction. We can happen or the vanquisher or the savior of the edible dormouse species. Choice depends only from us.
EN
In this paper the author will present an argument that the view of species having the ontological status of individuals implies that species actually have the ontological status of classes, despite the fact that the representatives of the view that species are individuals (or SAI) claim the contrary. Representatives of the SAI view try to argue that species cannot be classes because classes cannot change. He will show that, according to the representatives of the SAI view, groups of organisms must fulfil four necessary conditions in order to be treated as species. They must be: 1. integrated and continuous spatiotemporal genealogical lineages of organisms that are their constituent elements; 2. separated from the continuous genealogical lineage, from the last known common ancestor to modern organisms, by evolutionary unity; 3. made up of organisms going through the same or similar evolutionary processes; 4. groups of organisms whose members reproduce sexually. He will also show that when these conditions are compared to the list of extrinsic essential properties made by Caplan and Devitt it will be apparent that they are the same. In conclusion the author will argue that if, under the SAI view, one of the necessary conditions that groups of organisms must fulfil in order to be treated as species is that members of the species must reproduce sexually, then each member of the species must possess the same specific mate recognition system or SMRS, which in turn makes SMRS an intrinsic essential property of each member of the species. What follows from this is that, according to the species and individuals view, species are in fact classes.
Filozofia (Philosophy)
|
2012
|
vol. 67
|
issue 6
491 – 497
EN
The paper deals with Aquinas’ theory of intentional forms, so-called species, insofar as it gives an account of the validity of human cognitive acts. Its focus is on the objectivity of knowledge and the basis of radical (Cartesian) scepticism, therefore the comparisons to the modern theory of ideas are employed. However, the author’s aim is not a defence against scepticism; her aim is rather to provide certain insights into its origins.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.