Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  SUBORDINATION
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The study introduces soldiers of basic compulsory military service and doing their civic duty from the point of view of ethnology. The first part contains the historical information about military duties. In second part the authoress is trying to define social group of the basic compulsory military service soldiers. In another part of the study she is focusing on analysis of the special phnenomenon. The last part indicates value attitudes of respondents towards the basic compulsory military service. Social group of soldiers of the basic compulsory military service represents a temporary way of grouping the uniformed people, who are doing their civic duty. They live in mutual relationships relatively separated from social life. They are subordinated to a strict discipline, their own rules and initiations. The soldiers of military service have some status within formal and informal relations. Differences in status are demonstrated in share of authority and advantages in relations to others. To realize expected behaviour on the certain position means to perform social role in the social system. The sphere of rights and duties was manifested by clothes too. There is a strong identity in the social group of soldiers of military service. The soldiers of military service could be split up into four groups. Coming into the group and transition from one group to another one is a ceremonial process. In the 19. and first half of 20. century passing through military service meant achievement of adulthood and ability of get married. Informers declared that passing through military service in the 21. century doesn't mean to be adult. According to the respondents there's no sense in passing military service. They agreed with foundation of professional army.
EN
It is widely known that the rigid two-term system of clause classes, coordinate and subordinate, though in many respects of fundamental importance, does not provide a reliable basis for examining all aspects of clause clustering in multi-clause (compound or complex) sentences and prevents the formulation of cross-linguistically valid statements in this syntactic domain. Notably, it fails to answer the cardinal question of what exactly belongs to any of these two classes with exclusion of the other. This failure is seemingly due to the lack of unambiguous formal criteria that would be able to account for the semantic (functional) side of this basic bipartition. The paper aims at drawing attention to some of the most outstanding problems obscuring the coordinate-subordinate distinction and to point out structural and semantic limits of what might be classified as sentential and phrasal coordination in Korean.
EN
A syntactic construction may require a special context without which it never occurs. Such a construction is the 'van, aki' ('there are/exist those/people who') type subordination in Hungarian that is only attested in enumeration, i.e., as a member of a larger coordinated structure. The author discusses the 'van, aki' construction as a case of free reference, presented in an inductive analysis based on examples.
4
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Autorytaryzm i partnerstwo

51%
PL
W artykule przedstawiono psychologiczne i  społeczno-kulturowe uwarunkowania dwóch przeciwstawnych systemów organizacyjnych: autorytarnego i  partnerskiego. Punktem wyjścia ich rozróżnienia jest różnica w  poczuciu umiejscowienia kontroli nad własnym działaniem wśród członków organizacji. Zewnętrzne lub wewnętrzne poczucie umiejscowienia kontroli jako cecha psychologiczna decyduje o  stosunku do hierarchii władzy, jej stabilności i  przedmiotowym lub podmiotowym traktowaniu podwładnych przez przełożonego oraz związanych z  tym wzorach kulturowych. Chociaż w  artykule nie usiłowano formułować jednoznacznych ocen wartościujących, to jego treść wyraźnie wskazuje na potrzebę rozwijania organizacji partnerskich i  eliminowania systemów autorytarnych. Tendencja ta wynikać powinna nie tylko z  powodu technicznych i  ekonomicznych warunków funkcjonowania współczesnych organizacji, ale także, a  może przede wszystkim, ze względów moralnych.
EN
This paper presents the psychological and socio-cultural conditions of two contrasting organizational systems-authoritarianism and partnership. The starting point for differentiating them is the difference in sense of location of control over one's actions amidst members of the organization. An external or internal sense of location of control as a psychological quality determines the relationship to the hierarchy of authority, its stability, and the objective or subjective treatment of subordinates by the superior as well as related cultural models. Although this article makes no attempt to formulate unequivocal valuations, its contents clearly points to a need to develop partnership organizations and eliminate authoritarian systems. This tendency should not only be the result of technical reasons and economic conditions under which today's organizations function, but also, or perhaps primarily, for moral reasons.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.