Search results

1

Семиотическая сущность невербального эмоционально кода и специфика его номинации (на материале славянских языков)

100%

Kalimullina L.

Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski

|

2013

|

vol. 4

533-545

EN

The article deals with the main problems of correlation of the verbal and non-verbal codes from the semiotic point of view. The author differentiates several groups of the non-verbal components according to the relationship of their content and form and argues the priority of the verbal or non-verbal codes in the process of expression of the inner states. Special attention is paid to investigation of the lexemes and idioms which denote a non-verbal manifestation of such basic emotions as joy, sorrow, fear, anger, astonishment, etc., in the Russian, Bulgarian, Polish and Czech languages.

2

Роль морфонологического фактора в обогащении лексического запаса языка

100%

Pociechina H.

Acta Polono-Ruthenica

|

2009

|

vol. Tom 1 Nr XIV

475-486

EN

This paper discusses a problem of functioning of grammatical variants of inflection forms and substantive word-formations on the surface of lexical semantics in the Slavonic languages. Author comes to conclusion that the role of morphonological factor in vocabulary enrichment consists in the liquidation of the segmental alternations on the morpheme borders in the process of diachronic development of grammatical variation of substantive forms. Depending on the presence or absence of alternations, the grammatical meaning of concrete variants of inflectional forms or substantive wordformations can be lexicalizated and build the different meanings and/or stylistic connotations in the lexical subsystem of language.

3

Sobre los orígenes y las confusiones terminológicoconceptuales de los términos de "aspecto"y de "Aktionsart"

100%

Pawlak A.

Studia Romanica Posnaniensia

|

2008

|

vol. 35

257-266

EN

The paper presents, on the one hand, various terms that assign the categories of aspect and Aktionsart and, on the other hand, emphasizes that the concepts regarding them are not homogeneous. The confusions are supposed to have originated in the past. Therefore, we'll sketch briefly the history of aspect and Aktionsart in order to show that the term and the concept of aspect should be related exclusively to the Slavonic languages.

4

O podstawach teoretycznych semantycznej kategorii ablatywności w językach słowiańskich

100%

Lachur C.

Acta Polono-Ruthenica

|

2008

|

vol. Tom 1 Nr XIII

437-446

EN

The basis for designation of the category of ablativeness is apresence in a language of a physical idea of translocation of an object with respect to a localizer as well as specific linguistic means which reflect the said idea. Ablativeness is a specific type of movement indicating translocation from the localizer (or its part). Such understanding of ablativeness reflects a mode of perception of specific phenomenon in reality by language users. Therefore this article discusses the very essence of semantic category of ablativeness.

5

Цигулка, гъдулка… i inne nazwy ‘skrzypiec’ w języku bułgarskim (w porównaniu z pozostałymi językami słowiańskimi)

100%

Rusek Z.

Studia z Filologii Polskiej i Słowiańskiej

|

2013

|

vol. 48

EN

Цигулка, гъдулка… and other names for ‘violin, fiddle’ in Bulgarian (in comparison to other Slavonic languages)This paper analyses names for ‘violin’ in Bulgarian, examined against a Slavonic background. A broader approach has been taken to these names, because the article concerns not only the “classic” violin, but also the folk instruments (fiddles), which have different names in Bulgarian (and other Slavonic languages): цигулка, гъдулка, гусла, кемане, лаута, виолина, гънилка, виулица. These names are described from the semantic, derivational and etymological point of view. The noun цигулка, the basic name of ‘violin’, occurs only in Bulgarian and it is unknown in other Slavonic languages, although there are documented derivatives in Serbo-Croatian. The noun кемане ‘violin’, from Turkish, also occurs in Macedonian and Serbo-Croatian and other languages belonging to the Balkan league. The second part of the papers is devoted to the names for ‘violin’ in other Slavonic languages. Some names, extant only in some of the Slavonic languages, are derived from an onomatopoeic stem (Bulg. цигулка, Pol. skrzypce, East-Slavonic скрипка). Most of the Slavonic languages have a noun derived from gǫsli, a Common Slavic ancestor, but in some Slavonic languages (Czech, Slovak, and Sorabic) this word now means the classic violin, while in others it means ‘fiddle’ (comp. Pol. gęśle, Bulg. гусла), and in the Eastern Slavonic languages and Old Church Slavonic it means a ‘plucked string instrument’ ‘a kind of lute’. In Serbo-Croatian it means both the classic violin and primitive fiddle. Polabian has its own name form ‘violin’ gigléikia, which comes from German.

6

Georg Ziegelmeyer, Norbert Cyffer (eds.), Aspects of Co- and Subordination. Case Studies from African, Slavonic, and Turkic Languages, Köln: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag, 2010, 289 pp.

100%

Pawlak N.

Studies in African Languages and Cultures

|

2011

|

issue 45

95-100

EN

A review of a book by Georg Ziegelmeyer, Norbert Cyffer (eds.) "Aspects of Co- and Subordination. Case Studies from African, Slavonic, and Turkic Languages".

7

Ksiądz / księża / książę

88%

Czarnecki T.

Academic Journal of Modern Philology

|

2013

|

vol. 2

7-18

EN

The article tries, once again, to explore the etymology of Polish words ksiądz / książę / księża. Since new linguistic and historical facts as well as reconstructions may be presented in this field, the author draws the following conclusions: 1) the Polish term ksiądz comes from the Germanic *kuning, which main meaning could be interpreted as “Franks’ ruler”. The word was borrowed by Slavic languages twice: a) in the first half of the 7th century as a West-Slavic word *kъnędzь; b) in the first half of the 8th century as a South-Slavic word *kъnęgъ. In the second half of the 9th century, the two borrowings meet, which is connected with the Cyril and Methodius’s Christianization in Great Moravia. The word was present in all Slavic languages and its meaning could be interpreted as “the uncrowned ruler of the country” = ‘principes’/Polish ‘książę’. 2) Polish księża (< Slav. *kъnęžьja) is a continuation of a plural form of the Germanic *kuning-, *kuninga. 3) The word książę (< West-Slavonic *kъnęžę) appeared as a derivative of Slavonic *kъnędzь and at first meant ‘a young man who was a member of a ruling family’ and most commonly was ‘the son of a ruler’. 4) At the turn of the 9th and the 10th century Western-Slavonic people changed the meaning of both terms *kъnędzь and *knęžę the first word, both among Czechs and Poles, referred only to the word ‘principes’, whereas the second term began to be understood as “a common prince” or “the uncrowned ruler”. From the 13th century until the 16th century, Polish ksiądz became – under the infl uence of the Czech language – the term for a clergyman (firstly used as the reference only to the bishop, and later as the reference to an ordinary priest).

8

The Semantic Forms, Branches and Derivatives of the all‑Slavonic Root lich‑

75%

Czerwiński P.

Slavia Orientalis

|

2020

|

vol. LXIX

|

issue 4

9

Funkcja stylistyczna wypowiedzi w perspektywie lingwistyki porównawczej

75%

KIKLEWICZ A.

Stylistyka

|

2011

|

vol. 20

19-39

EN

The tendency in researching language stylistics is that researchers rather start from a certain style and assign language properties to it, including syntactic ones. In the presented article, which is based on the model of functional syntax (Kiklewicz 1999; 2004), the author suggests an opposite research perspective, that is analysis of stylistic properties of specific kinds of syntactic structures. Being completion of the former description rule this research suggestion contributes to a comprehensive presentation of language competence where stylistic markedness of language units constitutes an important aspect. For this reason and due to isolation of categorical content of the function, scope of its meaning and reference the suggestion depicted is so helpful in comparing languages.

10

Uwagi do etymologii słowiańskiej nazwy potrawy „gołąbki”

75%

Stachowski M.

Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski

|

2016

|

vol. 2

239-244

EN

No reasonable explanation of the peculiar semantic proportion gołąb ‘pigeon’: gołąbek ‘cabbage roll’ (lit. ‘small pigeon’) has been presented so far. This author suggests that the latter is actually a separate word, possibly borrowed from some Oriental language, and only secondarily adapted to the Polish word gołąb ‘pigeon’ and thus also to its etymological equivalents in the Slavonic languages of Eastern Europe.

11

Русский языік в модели экспликативного синтаксиса

75%

Kiklewicz A.

Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski

|

2016

|

vol. 1

133-152

EN

The author presents a linguistic model of an explicative syntax, which is being developed by the Polish syntactic school (it is based on the syntactic works of a famous Polish linguist Stanisław Karolak). The article describes the theoretical principles of this scientific direction and shows its application in practice (and namely by description of the basic syntactic structures of Slavic languages). The author examines this model in comparison with other models, in particular the Moscow semantic school.

12

Per un’educazione alla scrittura accademica in italiano LS utilizzando i segni interpuntivi a partire da usi e interpretazioni degli scriventi di lingue slave

63%

De Tommaso V.

Italica Wratislaviensia

|

2023

|

issue 14.1

57-76

IT

L’articolo riporta le riflessioni nate da un’indagine sulle esperienze di scrittura prima e durante i primi due anni di università e sugli usi interpuntori nella propria L1 e nell’italiano LS da parte di apprendenti cechi e slovacchi. Le esperienze con i segni interpuntivi in L1 e i riferimenti presenti nelle grammatiche scolastiche ceche/slovacche fanno emergere un’interpretazione esclusivamente sintattica e un contatto parziale con il sistema interpuntorio poiché limitato al solo uso della virgola; a questo segno, inoltre, viene attribuito in L1 valore esclusivamente segmentante. Per un’educazione alla scrittura del testo accademico in italiano LS che contribuisca a superare fenomeni di frammentarietà, giustapposizione, scarsa coesione testuale, i risultati dell’indagine suggeriscono un’azione didattica che punti sui valori coesivi dei segni interpuntivi e che solo in parte si appoggi a un approccio contrastivo, ovvero quando la ratio interpuntoria dei due sistemi coincida o quando sembri coincidere.

EN

This article focuses on the results of a survey on writing experiences during secondary school and the first two years of high school and on the use of punctuation marks in L1 and Italian L2 by Czech and Slovak learners. Students’ past experiences with punctuation marks in L1 and references in Czech/Slovak schoolbooks reveal a strictly syntactic approach; students practise the use of the comma only, which is assumed to have purely separating values. In order to help students develop language skills for academic writing in Italian L2 and to avoid choppy writing and lack of cohesion, the research findings suggest that the teacher should highlight the cohesive/linking values of punctuation marks. The contrastive approach can be useful to a certain degree: up to the point where the punctuation principles of the two languages are equivalent or where they seem to be equivalent.

13

Об этимологических и семантических соответствиях русской лексемы "гордость" в славянских языках

63%

Стефанский Е.

Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Linguistica Rossica

|

2021

|

issue 20

107-120

EN

The article analyses the Slavic vocabulary denoting “pride”. The author examines lexemes that convey this notion in different Slavonic languages along with their value characteristics; next, the author looks at the semantic processes which caused the words ascending to the Proto-Slavic root *gr̥d- to change their meaning in a number of Slavic languages. The material for the study was collected from parallel texts (originals and translations) and national corpora of Slavic languages. Comparative, comparative-historical, and system-structural methods were used. The analysis showed that only in the Russian and Bulgarian literary languages the root *gr̥d-did not develop enantiosemy. In West Slavonic languages, the enantiosemy of the root *gr̥d- has developed towards the semantics of disdain, but this root continues to be actively used to denote positive pride. At the same time, the root *pych- is used in these languages to convey negative pride. Ukrainian and Belarusian languages have developed an enantiosemy similar to West Slavic languages and adopted the root *pych- as a central means of denoting negative pride, but retained, as in Russian, the root *gr̥d- to convey both negative and positive pride. The Serbian, Croatian and Slovene languages have developed the enantiosemy of the root *gr̥d- towards the meaning of “ugly”; they use the lexeme ponos and its derivatives to indicate positive pride; negative pride is expressed using the root borrowed from Russian -gord-.

RU

В статье анализируется славянская лексика, обозначающая ‘гордость’. При этом, с одной стороны, рассматриваются лексемы, передающие данное понятие в разных славянских языках, и их ценностные характеристки. С другой – анализируются семантические процессы, которые привели к тому, что слова, восходящие к праславянскому корню *gr̥d-, в ряде славянских языков изменили свое значение. Материал для исследования собирался на основе параллельных текстов (оригиналов и переводов) и национальных корпусов славянских языков. Применялись сопоставительный, сравнительно-исторический, системноструктурный методы. Анализ показал, что только русский и болгарский литературные языки не развили энантиосемию корня *gr̥d-. В западнославянских языках энантиосемия корня *gr̥d- развилась в сторону семантики презрения, однако данный корень активно продолжает использоваться для обозначения позитивной гордости. Одновременно для передачи негативной гордости в этих языках употребляется корень *pych-. Украинский и белорусский языки развили аналогичную западнославянским языкам энантиосемию и получили в качестве центрального средства обозначения негативной гордости корень *pych-, но сохранили, как в русском языке, корень *gr̥d- для передачи как негативной, так и позитивной гордости. Сербский, хорватский и словенский языки развили энантиосемию корня *gr̥d- в сторону значения ‘уродливый’, для обозначения положительной гордости в них используется лексема ponos и ее дериваты, негативная гордость выражается с помощью заимствованного из русского корня -горд-.

14

Этимология чешских названий барбариса

63%

Janyšková I.

Rocznik Slawistyczny

|

2016

|

vol. 65

53-60

EN

The paper dealing with etymological explication of Czech terms for the barberry explains semantic motivation of terms for the European barberry (Berberis vulgaris L.), indigenous in this country. Lexical material is classifi ed into 14 groups according to their semantic motivation. The woody plant has been named by its effects and physiological characteristics: it causes diarrhoea (dřišťál), fruits and leaves are sour (octák); by external marks: a thorny plant (dráč); by practical utilization of fruits for drink preparation (octák, pivník, psí víno, divoké víno); by legends and myths (Kristova koruna, koruna Krista Pána, Krista Pána plač). Common is transmission of terms of other plants to the barberry, based especially on similar fruits resembling the barberry fruits with their form or colour (kaliník, vlašská kalina, farářovy čepičky, bezinki, šípkové jablko). Also loanwords from German (surouch, vančár, vanžár) and Latin (berberka) have been registered.

15

Особенности этноязыковой ситуации в регионе Карашево (Румыния)

51%

Конëр Д., Макарова А.

Poznańskie Studia Slawistyczne

|

2015

|

issue 8

EN

Krashovani are the Catholic Slavic language minority settled in the region of Romanian Banat. They live in seven villages: Karashevo, Clocotici, Lupac, Nermet, Vodnic, Rafnic and Iabalcea, however, the last one represents an untypical case from the linguists’ point of view, the habitants usually communicate in Romanian, though they continue to declare themselves Krashovani. Time and reason of possible switch have not been clarified yet, as well as the Krashovanis’ ethnogenesis and detailed history. The most popular scientific theories attach them to Serbians or Croatians. Although their archaic idiom contains more features of Kosovo-Resava or Prizren-Timok dialect areas, recently the locals have started to define themselves as Croatians, mainly due to the influences of the Catholic church and modern Croatian cultural politics. In this paper based on the results of our fieldwork in Karashevo, we analyze some particularities of the contemporary ethnolinguistic situation there, paying special attention to the actual state of both Slavic and Romanian idioms used in this microregion.

16

Nazwy części twarzy w językach słowiańskich

51%

Rytter G.

Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Linguistica Rossica

|

2016

|

issue 12

127-138

EN

Etymological sketch presents 19 words, in the majority of all-Slavonic range. They are thematically connected with Slavic *tvarь. The article also contains comments about Slavs’ cultural tradition, which ascribes attribute “lucky” to the right eye and “ill-fated” to the left one. To the oldest and most popular beliefs preserved in the Slavonic folklore belongs conviction that human eye has a power of casting a spell or a curse on somebody.

PL

Szkic etymologiczny prezentuje 19 wyrazów, w większości o zasięgu ogólnosłowiańskim. Są one tematycznie związane z psł. *tvarь. Artykuł zawiera również uwagi o tradycji kulturowej Słowian, która prawemu oku przypisuje atrybut „szczęśliwe”, lewemu – „nieszczęśliwe”. Do najstarszych i najpowszechniejszych wierzeń zachowanych w folklorze słowiańskim należy przekonanie, że ludzkie oko ma moc rzucania uroku czy klątwy.

17

K jedné kapitole z dějin jazykovědy. Příspěvek k 150. výročí úmrtí srovnávacího jazykovědce Augusta Schleichera

51%

Vodrážková L.

Časopis pro moderní filologii (Journal for Modern Philology)

|

2018

|

vol. 100

|

issue 1

111-119

EN

The article concerns the history of linguistics in the 19th century, in particular August Schleicher’s place in the history of linguistics and his scholarly heritage for linguistics in the 20th century, recalling that he was the founder of a method still characteristic of comparative linguistics today. The report describes the theory and methodology of this German representative of comparative linguistics, presenting Schleicher’s research, which was influenced by Darwin’s Origin of Species and by Hegel’s philosophy. In Prague (1850–1857) Schleicher worked intensively on the synchronic and historical grammar of Old Church Slavonic (1852) and of Lithuanian (1856–1857). In Jena (1857–1868) he wrote one of the major syntheses of comparative and historical grammar of the Indo-European languages — his Compendium der vergleichenden Sprachwissenschaft der indogermanischen Sprachen (Compendium of the Comparative Grammar of the Indo-European Languages, 1861–1862) in which he postulated the first historical and comparative phonology of the Indo-European languages, which depends on the regularity, or “universal validity”, of the rules of sound change, or “sound laws”, and consolidated the large number of phonological and morphological descriptions of individual Indo-European languages into the unified system of a reconstructed Proto-Indo-European language; Schleicher then represented the inter-relationships of the Indo-European languages in the form of a genealogical tree diagram (Stammbaum).

18

Этимология чешских названий барбариса

51%

Janyšková I.

Rocznik Slawistyczny

|

2016

|

issue LXV

Refine search results

Семиотическая сущность невербального эмоционально кода и специфика его номинации (на материале славянских языков)

Роль морфонологического фактора в обогащении лексического запаса языка

Sobre los orígenes y las confusiones terminológicoconceptuales de los términos de "aspecto"y de "Aktionsart"

O podstawach teoretycznych semantycznej kategorii ablatywności w językach słowiańskich

Цигулка, гъдулка… i inne nazwy ‘skrzypiec’ w języku bułgarskim (w porównaniu z pozostałymi językami słowiańskimi)

Georg Ziegelmeyer, Norbert Cyffer (eds.), Aspects of Co- and Subordination. Case Studies from African, Slavonic, and Turkic Languages, Köln: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag, 2010, 289 pp.

Ksiądz / księża / książę

The Semantic Forms, Branches and Derivatives of the all‑Slavonic Root lich‑

Funkcja stylistyczna wypowiedzi w perspektywie lingwistyki porównawczej

Uwagi do etymologii słowiańskiej nazwy potrawy „gołąbki”

Русский языік в модели экспликативного синтаксиса

Per un’educazione alla scrittura accademica in italiano LS utilizzando i segni interpuntivi a partire da usi e interpretazioni degli scriventi di lingue slave

Об этимологических и семантических соответствиях русской лексемы "гордость" в славянских языках

Этимология чешских названий барбариса

Особенности этноязыковой ситуации в регионе Карашево (Румыния)

Nazwy części twarzy w językach słowiańskich

K jedné kapitole z dějin jazykovědy. Příspěvek k 150. výročí úmrtí srovnávacího jazykovědce Augusta Schleichera

Этимология чешских названий барбариса