Search results

1

Les arts du spectacle selon les romantiques. Stendhal, Gautier, Nerval critiques musicaux

100%

Opiela-Mrozik A.

Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Litteraria Romanica

|

2018

|

issue 13

63-74

PL

Artykuł zawiera przegląd wybranych artykułów krytycznych Stendhala, Gautiera i Nervala, obejmujących sprawozdania z przedstawień operowych i baletowych oraz koncertów muzyki instrumentalnej. Celem analizy porównawczej jest określenie indywidualnych koncepcji muzyki i artysty. Poprzez opisy librett, zdolności wykonawców czy scenografii krytycy tworzą własny ideał sztuki. Uwagi Stendhala z Notatek Dyletanta wynikają z koncepcji nowoczesnego piękna. Artykuły Gautiera zebrane w Historii sztuki dramatycznej… znamionują poetę wrażliwego na wizualną stronę przedstawienia oraz krytyka otwartego na nowości i marzącego o harmonii w sztuce. W felietonach prasowych Nervala widoczny jest podziw dla muzyki epok minionych z jednoczesnym zainteresowaniem nowatorskimi pomysłami i ideą dzieła syntetycznego, która zwiastuje sztukę przyszłości.

EN

This article is the review of some critical articles of Stendhal, Gautier and Nerval which contain reports of operas, ballets and instrumental music concerts. The aim of this comparative analysis is to define the individual concepts of music and artist. The critics make their own ideal of music through the descriptions of the librettos, scenography and the abilities of the performers. The Stendhal’s remarks from Notes d’un Dilettante resulted from the idea of the modern beauty whereas the Gautier’s articles collected in Histoire de l’art dramatique… show the poet who is sensitive to the visual aspect of a performance and the critic who is open to the newness and dreaming of the harmony in art. Instead, in the Nerval’s press columns are visible the admiration for the music of the past age as well as the interest in the innovative schemes and the idea of the synthetic work which heralds the future art.

2

Übersetzen ohne Kenntnis der fremden Sprache. Rainer Maria Rilke und die „portugiesischen“ Sonette von Elizabeth Barrett Browning

93%

Unglaub E.

Slovo a smysl - Word & Sense

|

2020

|

vol. 17

|

issue 1

199-220

EN

Professional practice seems to preclude translating texts from a language over which the translator has not achieved mastery. However, 20th century German literature has at least two prominent examples of such cases. Rainer Maria Rilke translated the sonnets of the English poet Elizabeth Barrett Browning and Karl Kraus the Sonnets of Shakespeare. Looking to Rilke, it is apparent that such a project can succeed under the right conditions. Collaborators and friends provided preliminary and prose versions, making possible a translation process analogous to the act of creation. Rilke illustrates this process with Stendhal’s picture of ‘crystallization’. Meanwhile, the creation of the collection Sonnets from the Portuguese reveals some questions and problems associated with the act of translation, also evident in the title and authorship of the publications.

3

Sarkazm i pobłażliwość

83%

Kącka E.

Przegląd Humanistyczny

|

2019

|

vol. 63(2 (465))

25-32

PL

In the text Sarcasm and Indulgence, there is an analysis of human relations in Jane Austen’s Sense and Sensibility. The marriage as a fact – and the space for a social game – is here one of the examples of modelling of the connections and their linguistic representation. The gossip is attached to the structure of the novel, in which it penetrates the hidden. The work of Austen refers to two modes of talking, two styles: the private talk and the officialornamental talk. The model of the novel of the author of Sense and Sensibility has been compared here with the one of Stendhal.

4

Korespondencja sztuk, czyli monotonia pagórków

70%

Chlebowski P.

Studia Norwidiana

|

2012

|

vol. 30

229-244

EN

The article is concerned with a discussion and assessment of Ilona Woronow’s book “Romantyczna idea korespondencji sztuk. Stendhal, Hoffmann, Baudelaire, Norwid” (The Romantic Idea of Correspondence of Arts. Stendhal, Hoffmann, Baudelaire, Norwid) (Kraków 2008) devoted to one of the most important ideas in the epoch. The author tries to define the theoretical and critical basis of the whole phenomenon in the perspective of four important figures of literary life of that time. She focuses first of all on the semantic dimension of the problem – she tries to show and solve the intricacies and ambiguities of Romantics judgments and opinions. However, she pays almost no attention to the aesthetic or axiological aspect of the concept of “correspondence of arts”, which leads to narrowing the whole research perspective. This unconscious limitation also leads to a great degree to a lack of clarity of the argumentation. In the book only the chapter devoted to Stendhal is redeemed, as well as some parts treating about Norwid (a good reading of the poem “Nie myśl, nie pisz – podmaluj” (Do not think, do not write – just paint) is noteworthy). The whole has a fragmentary nature, which presses heavily on it, and the multitude of quotations devoid of their context and of penetrating commentaries, the numerous digressions and unexpected turns of the narrative lead the reader towards some “semantic forest”, and not to a clear conclusion: in fact, there is no clearly distinguished point of departure and no clearly determined aim. This is why the reader who was promised a view from the tallest mountain is disappointed, as he is only given the monotony of hills.

5

Korespondencja sztuk, czyli monotonia pagórków

70%

Chlebowski P.

Studia Norwidiana

|

2012

|

vol. 30

229-244

EN

The article is concerned with a discussion and assessment of Ilona Woronow's book Romantyczna idea korespondencji sztuk. Stendhal, Hoffmann, Baudelaire, Norwid (The Romantic Idea of Correspondence of Arts. Stendhal, Hoffmann, Baudelaire, Norwid) (Kraków 2008) devoted to one of the most important ideas in the epoch. The author tries to define the theoretical and critical basis of the whole phenomenon in the perspective of four important figures of literary life of that time. She focuses first of all on the semantic dimension of the problem – she tries to show and solve the intricacies and ambiguities of Romantics judgments and opinions. However, she pays almost no attention to the aesthetic or axiological aspect of the concept of “correspondence of arts”, which leads to narrowing the whole research perspective. This unconscious limitation also leads to a great degree to a lack of clarity of the argumentation. In the book only the chapter devoted to Stendhal is redeemed, as well as some parts treating about Norwid (a good reading of the poem Nie myśl, nie pisz – podmaluj (Do not think, do not write – just paint) is noteworthy). The whole has a fragmentary nature, which presses heavily on it, and the multitude of quotations devoid of their context and of penetrating commentaries, the numerous digressions and unexpected turns of the narrative lead the reader towards some “semantic forest”, and not to a clear conclusion: in fact, there is no clearly distinguished point of departure and no clearly determined aim. This is why the reader who was promised a view from the tallest mountain is disappointed, as he is only given the monotony of hills.

Refine search results

2 Studia Norwidiana

1 Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Litteraria Romanica

1 Przegląd Humanistyczny

1 Slovo a smysl - Word & Sense

2 Chlebowski P.

1 Kącka E.

1 Opiela-Mrozik A.

1 Unglaub E.

2 2020

1 2019

1 2018

1 2012

Les arts du spectacle selon les romantiques. Stendhal, Gautier, Nerval critiques musicaux

Übersetzen ohne Kenntnis der fremden Sprache. Rainer Maria Rilke und die „portugiesischen“ Sonette von Elizabeth Barrett Browning

Sarkazm i pobłażliwość

Korespondencja sztuk, czyli monotonia pagórków

Korespondencja sztuk, czyli monotonia pagórków