Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 8

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Teoria prawa
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

O niezmienności sposobu uprawiania dogmatyki prawa

100%
Leszczyński J.
Studia Prawno-Ekonomiczne
|
2010
|
vol. LXXXI (81)
115-129
EN
Aulis Aarnio in a few studies examined the applicability of the concept of scientific paradigm created by Thomas T. Kuhn to describe the legal dogmatics. First of all, the aim of that study was to elucidate the changes in legal dogmatics. He stated that the paradigm of legal dogmatics, in principle, does not change because it is impossible to indicate a crisis crucial to change the paradigm. Variations occur only within a dogmatist legal theories or in ways of interpreting the basic disciplinary matrix. . This phenomenon can be explained by the fact that legal dogmatics are basically oriented practically rather than cognitively. Legal dogmatics serve legal practice by solving problems of interpretation and application of the law. Assumptions about the nature of the objects perceived from the perspective of that practice, the relationship between them, the way to explore these objects and the operations concerning them, do not need to have theoretical nature. Objects, in which legal dogmatics are interested as text and meaning, are not natural objects, so we cannot speak about the crisis in describing them.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Argument interpretacyjny odwołujący się do woli rzeczywistego prawodawcy

71%
Borowicz J.
Studia Prawno-Ekonomiczne
|
2009
|
vol. LXXIX (79)
9-28
EN
The article focuses on the interpretative argument which appeals to the intentions of the participants of the legislative process in order to explain the meaning of legal texts. The author describes differences between the argument based on the intentions of the real lawgiver and the approach to legal interpretation based on the idea of the rationality of lawgiver. The main difference concerns ideal character of the presuppositons about the rationality of lawgiver contrasted with the approach concentrated on the attempt to discover actual intentions of the participants of the legislative process. The author also describes normative and conceptual arguments concerning interpretation of law based on the intentions of the real, historical lawgiver. It is argued that this approach to the legal interpretation is justified but should not be treated as one of many valid interpretative arguments which should be weighed against each other. The article contains also an example of the use of the above interpretative argument dicussed above.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Kontekst odkrycia i kontekst uzasadnienia w świetle topicznej koncepcji prawa

71%
Holocher J.
Studia Prawno-Ekonomiczne
|
2009
|
vol. LXXX (80)
9-29
EN
The subject of this text is the distinction between the context of discovery and context of justification in legal reasoning, exemplified by the discursive concept of law which is represented by legal topics, however, the deliberations contained herein are of the philosophical and legal nature instead of dogmatic and legal one, thus, they do not directly refer to any field of law. The starting point and also justification for the deliberations is to assume a hypothesis for the possible adaptation of the appointed distinction in the theory of law Its meaning has been limited to two separate questions referred to various aspects of legal interpretation and argumentation, the former being: “How do we arrive at formulating an interpretative hypothesis?”, and the latter: “How can it be justified?”. The main thesis of the text comes down to a statement that it is the nature of legal reasoning as presented by legal topics which defines both the way of arriving at an interpretative hypothesis understood as a proposal to settle a dispute as well as the way of justification for such hypothesis. As a result of that, a topical point of view is associated with both views being in favour of the genetic and validative value of heuristics in the process of legal cognition and the kind of preferred justification criteria, which, in case of topics, constitutes a consensus of opinions on what, in a specific here and now case, is or might be regarded as just. That means that the final decision on the value of legal reasoning and adjudicationis coming down to connect a specific legal effect with the actual state of affairs will be made on the basis of both the context of legal discovery and the context of justification.
4
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

O wartości logicznej normy prawnej

71%
Bekrycht T.
Studia Prawno-Ekonomiczne
|
2011
|
vol. LXXXIV (84)
11-38
EN
The article discusses metalogical issues taking up in jurisprudence and putting a question connected to logical value of legal norms and logical value of the other statements in normative discourse. Its content is an attempt to make these issues from ontological analysis point of view, deals with the legal norm and from speech act theory point of view, showing the necessity of modification existing in literature of the subject linguistic and non-linguistic conceptions of legal norm. The content of the article focuses on analysis truth carries and ontological status of legal norm, simultaneously emphasizing the necessity of distinction between predicative and attributive notion of truth.
5
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Rola i zadania teorii prawa rynku finansowego UE

54%
Fedorowicz M.
Bezpieczny Bank
|
2016
|
issue 1 (62)
114-134
PL
Celem opracowania jest uzasadnienie konieczności wyodrębnienia oraz wskazania istotnych elementów teorii prawa rynku finansowego, pomocnych w analizie i zrozumieniu niełatwej, obszernej i ciągle podlegającej zmianom jego materii. Obowiązujące przepisy z zakresu prawa rynku finansowego UE dają możliwość wyodrębnienia jego części ogólnej, która tworzy podwaliny dla budowy teorii prawa rynku finansowego. Kształtowanie normatywnego, teoretycznego szkieletu po- jęć, instytucji, instrumentów władczego i niewładczego oddziaływania na rynku finansowym w obliczu "nadprodukcji" aktów prawa dotyczących poszczególnych segmentów tego rynku jest szczególnie potrzebne dla szybkiego reagowania na wydarzenia na rynkach finansowych, a budowanie teorii prawa rynku finansowego i wyodrębnianie części ogólnej tego prawa, głównie przy zastosowaniu podejścia nadzorczego, odgrywać może rolę porządkującą i upraszczającą rozumienie przepisów.
EN
The aim of the present paper is to justify the necessity of singling out and identyfing relevant aspects of financial market law theory, which is useful in analyzing and understanding its challenging, extensive and constantly changing substance. This is an important contribution to the discussion about the changes in financial market law, caused in particular by the financial crisis and to underline the development of financial market law, also in its theoretical aspects, which is helpful in understanding modification of the financial market and in future might also help to avoid the inflation of law on the Eu financial market. The questions discussed in this paper help to develop and strengthen the theory of financial market law in its supervisory aspects, especially to distinguish the general part of financial market law reconstructed from ESA regulations and order those provisions that have an adaptational impact on the financial market.
6
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Znaczenie ról semiotycznych wypowiedzi, kontekstu i intencji w interpretacji norm prawa pozytywnego – Analiza fenomenologiczna

54%
Bekrycht T.
Studia Prawno-Ekonomiczne
|
2010
|
vol. LXXXII (82)
11-32
EN
Antas J., O kłamstwie i kłamaniu, Kraków 2008. Austin J. L., Mówienie i poznawanie, tł. B. Chwedeńczuk, Warszawa, 1993. Bekrycht T., Aprioryczność prawa. Ontologia prawa w fenomenologii Adolfa Reinacha, Warszawa 2009. Burkhardt A., Soziale Akte, Sprechakte und Textillokutionen, Niemeyer Max Verlag 1986. Geier M., Gra językowa filozofów, tł. J. Sidorek, Warszawa 2000. Gizbert-Studnicki T., Stwierdzenie jako akt mowy, Studia Filozoficzne 1973. Ingarden R., Czego nie wiemy o wartościach [w:] R. Ingarden, Przeżycie, dzieło, wartość, Kraków 1966. Ingarden R., O dziele literackim, tł. M. Turowicz, Warszawa 1988. Jędrzejewska A., Koncepcja oświadczenia woli w prawie cywilnym, Warszawa 1992. Kulesza W., Zniesławienie i zniewaga, Warszawa 1984. Lang W., Wróblewski J., Zawadzki S., Teoria państwa i prawa, Warszawa 1980. Opałek K., Wróblewski J., Prawo – metodologia, filozofia, teoria prawa, Warszawa 1991. Radwański Z., Wykładnia oświadczeń woli składnych indywidualnym adresatom, Wrocław 1992. Reinach A., Aprioryczne podstawy prawa cywilnego, tł. T. Bekrycht, Kraków 2009. Searle J. R., Czynności mowy, tł. B. Chwedeńczuk, Warszawa 1987. Wittgenstein L., Dociekania filozoficzne, tł. B. Wolniewicz, Warszawa 2000. Woleński J., Z zagadnień analitycznej filozofii prawa, Warszawa-Kraków 1980. Ziembiński, Z. Logika praktyczna, Warszawa 1994. Zirk-Sadowski M., Rozumienie ocen w języku prawnym, Łódź 1984.
7
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Teoria wykładni prawa jerzego wróblewskiego a dyrektywalna koncepcja znaczenia kazimierza ajdukiewicza

45%
Tomza A.
Studia Prawno-Ekonomiczne
|
2010
|
vol. LXXXII (82)
193-206
EN
Actuellement la théorie du droit s’occupe du problème de l’interprétation du droit convenable. A partir du changement de l’objet de la philosophie, la langue et le sens sont les objets des recherches. Jerzy Wróblewski crée la théorie de l’interprétation du droit qui concerne le problème en question. Donc, il utilise dans sa théorie la conception du sens de Kazimierz Ajdukiewicz, celle-ci ayant le caractère philosophique. Ajdukiewicz est d’avis qu’ on peut connaître la réalité seulement avec la langue. D’après la conception d’Ajdukiewicz il faut utiliser des directives du sens pour constater le sens au niveau logique. A la base de cette conception, Wróblewski crée des directives normatives pour constater le sens de la réglementation.
8
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Instytucja interpretacji prawa podatkowego w ujęciu art. 14a i 14b Ordynacji podatkowej – aspekt teoretycznoprawny (artykuł dyskusyjny)

45%
Bekrycht T., Brolik J.
Studia Prawno-Ekonomiczne
|
2012
|
vol. LXXXV (85)
11-33
EN
The article contains a detailed analysis of general and individual interpretations of tax law both in terms of particular articles` content and in a philosophical and sociological perspective. It`s a new, critical look at legal norms of interpretation applied by Minister of Finance and contained in Art. 14a and 14b Polish tax law. The authors believe that the present discussion is novel due to its non-positive perspective. The authors explicitly claim that only a close cooperation between legislative, executive and judiciary can secure democratic standards in the law for i.e. both reliability and predictability of law application.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.