Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Tulip Revolution
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
Protests in the postsoviet republics and, very recently, in Middle East and North African countries have focused attention again on the subject of the revolution. This paper is interested in events which happened in Kyrygyzstan in March 2005 commonly labeled as “the tulip revolution”. However, the aim of the article is not to provide objective depiction of the events or the answer the question what really was “the Tulip revolution”. Instead, it seeks to reveal the mechanisms of the interpretation and discursive construction of the events of March 2005 in the acts of public communication addressed to the people by the major beneficiary of these events, the incumbent president Kurmanbek Bakiev.
PL
Wydarzenia polityczne z 2003 roku w Gruzji, 2004 na Ukrainie oraz 2005 w Kirgistanie zwykło określać się kolorowymi rewolucjami na obszarze poradzieckim. Choć w pierwszej chwili przypisanie im rewolucyjnego charakteru może się wydawać słuszne, z perspektywy czasu można jednak stwierdzić, że w strukturze systemów politycznych Gruzji, Ukrainy i Kirgistanu nie doszło do zmian uzasadniających taki pogląd. Konsekwencje kolorowych rewolucji pozostały rewolucyjnymi tylko z nazwy. Mimo to ich polityczna użyteczność zdaje się przeważać nad stanem faktycznym zaszłych zmian.
EN
Political events that took place at the end of 2003 in Georgia, in 2004 in Ukraine and in 2005 in Kyrgyzstan are popularly called Rose, Orange and Tulip Revolution or collectively: Color Revolutions in the Post-Soviet space. At the first glance term “revolution” may seem to be appropriate. From a decade long perspective one may notice that the revolutionary changes in the political systems of Georgia, Ukraine and Kyrgyzstan did not take place, though. However, their consequences show that the political utility of calling them revolutionary outweighs the extent of the true political change.
EN
The purpose of this article is to characterize the Tulip Revolution in Kyrgyzstan (2005). The author presents the causes of the revolution, among other things: the importance of the tribal structure of Kyrgyzstan, nepotism and corruption during the presidency of Askar Akayev. The article presents the course of developments Tulip Revolution. Finally, the author focuses on the presentation of the most important implications of this revolution, such as the a revolution in 2010 and the resignation of President Kurmanbek Bakiyev.
RU
Целью данной статьи является характеристика «тюльпановой революции» в Кыргызстане (2005). Автор представляет причины революции, среди кото- рых: важность племенной структуры Кыргызстана, кумовство и коррупция в период президентства Аскара Акаева. В статье представлен ход событий «тюльпановой революции». В конце автор сосредотачивается на представ- лении наиболее важных последствий этой революции, таких как революция в 2010 году и отставка президента Курманбека Бакиева.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.