Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 7

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Twardowski
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
PL
W artykule została użyta metoda naukowej analizy, zaprezentowana przez Kaźmierza Twardowskiego w pracy „O czynnościach i wytworach”. Użyto jej do przebadania procesu interpretacji archiwaliów (na przykładzi e znajdujących się w IPN teczek dochodzeniowych). W artykule autor pokazuje, jak ta metoda może okazać się pomocna dla historyków w przypadkach, w których interpretacja jest skomplikowana.
EN
In the paper was used Kazimierz Twardowski’s method of scientifi c analysis form the paper Actions and Products to analyze process of interpreting archival folders (for example IPN process of inspection). In the paper author show how this method can be useful for historians in complicated cases of interpretation.
EN
“Pan Twardowski” is a half-legendary character of a Polish Renaissance alchemist, referred to in more than a dozen literary works. A man who sold his soul to the forces of evil in return for superhuman physical or mental abilities (and as a consequence – magical mastery of nature: Aarne-Thompson 756B) is also the theme of Goethe's "Faust". A little-known poet Aleksander Groza published an extensive work, "Twardowski", in 1873. It is a rather poor literary work, however, it does provide an excellent exemplification of multiple threads in the Orientalist discourse of the 19th century and many speculations revolving around it: “Egyptian” alchemy (and speculation relating to the achievements of that civilization), misconceptions surrounding the Egyptian eschatology (reincarnation, metempsychosis, etc.), the ethnogenesis of ancient Egyptians and their alleged relationships with India, theosophy or Gnosticism.
EN
The main purpose of the article is to define the framework in which one can situate Leopold Blaustein’s philosophy. The author focuses on the question of the method which is used by Blaustein and he situates it in the historical-philosophical context. The article defends the thesis that Blaustein uses a method which can be labelled as a phenomenologically oriented descriptive psychology that is close to, though not identical with, Edmund Husserl’s project as formulated in the first edition of his Logical Investigations and that is connected to Husserl’s 1925 lectures on the phenomenological psychology. The article is divided into four parts. In the first part, the author disputes the one-sided classifications of Blaustein’s philosophy either as a continuator of the analytical tradition of the Lvov-Warsaw School, or as a mere repetition of Husserl’s achievements. In the next part, the author sketches an intellectual biography of Blaustein and on this basis he defines the context in which one has to situate this thought. In this regard, two further parts of the article are devoted to two sources of inspiration for Blaustein. In the third part, a selection of methods and concepts of descriptive psychology are examined, and in the last part of the article, references to Husserl’s phenomenology are explored.
4
85%
EN
Kazimierz Twardowski’s contribution to the evolution of logicin Poland Twardowski’s legacy, which has been published so far—and the detailed analysis of it—suf fices to consider him a classic of Polish semiotics. The published results of Twardowski in the field of methodology also deserve high scores. A new light on the contribution of Twardowski to the development of logic in Poland sheds the content of his unpublished legacy, including the content of his lectures on logic and unedited logical monographs. Firstly, Twardowski conducted fruitful research on many methodological problems. The result of this research was—an unknown to a wider audience—a new approach to the theory of induction and an original sketch of the perspectives of the inductive method in metaphysics, the first in our literature such a comprehensive monograph on reasoning and reconstruction of the concept of understanding. Secondly, Twardowski referred in his unpublished lectures and monographs to the important results of the nineteenth-century formal logic, thus giving their students an important impulse for individual research in this field. In this text, I focus my attention on the logical issues raised by Twardowski just in his unpublished texts.
Kwartalnik Filozoficzny
|
2020
|
vol. 48
|
issue 1-2
127-155
EN
The purpose of this paper is twofold. First, I am going to sketch Ginsberg's arguments against a specific understanding of the terms “inseparability” (untrennbar/inseparable)/“separability” (trennbar/separable), rooted in Franz Brentano's descriptive psychology, where they are defined in relation to the content of consciousness (I call this approach intentional or “psychologistic”). Twardowski (Stumpf, Höfler) and, in a way, Husserl took this line. However, Husserl, in his whole/parts analysis, goes beyond the context of imaginative presentation. The secondary aim of the following investigations is to clarify and support Ginsberg's position on these issues through a reference to the terms introduced into ontological discourse by Ingarden. Unfortunately, neither Husserl's (semi-formal) whole-parts theory, nor Ginsberg's work on inseparability/separability, despite their undeniable merits, have so far attracted strong interest among philosophers. Yet possibilities are many: one could, for instance, investigate whether their detailed analyses of whole-part theory, inseparability/separability, different kinds of relations, forms of dependence, have something of value to offer in the current discussions within continental philosophy, or even within analytic philosophy of modern ontology. According to Husserl, these subjects are fundamental for ontology, which makes them continually relevant; there is still much to learn from those painstaking investigations of ontological relations.
PL
Przedmiotem artykułu jest analiza definicji „sądu” oraz „zdania”, jakie pojawiły się w podręcznikach do logiki w Polsce w pierwszej połowie XX wieku. W szczególności podjęto zagadnienie, na ile wyrażenia wartościujące i normatywne są prawdziwe lub fałszywe, a wobec tego są przedmiotem logiki formalnej. W zakończeniu przedstawiono wnioski z przeprowadzonej analizy. Wskazują one, że wyrażenia wartościujące i normatywne w ograniczonym stopniu mają wartość logiczną.
7
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Absolutyzm logiczny a ontologia

50%
EN
The text considers the link between logic and ontology in the context of the problem of future truth. The main issue examined in this paper is the following one: the classical logic is strongly insensitive to the ontological determinism-indeterminism problem.
PL
Tekst jest poświęcony związkowi między logiką a ontologią w kontekście problemu prawdziwości zdań o przyszłości. Jednym z rozważanych problemów jest „niewrażliwość” logiki klasycznej na ontologiczny problem determinizm-indeterminizm.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.