Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 5

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  approval
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

The Compilation and Execution of a Measurement of Chinese Undergraduates’ Moral Values Approval

100%
Zhu H.-L.
Ethics in Progress
|
2015
|
vol. 6
|
issue 2
93-103
EN
The study completes the compilation of the questionnaire on Chinese undergraduates’ moral values from six moral values dimensions: honesty and compliance, civility and self-discipline, love, unity and be helpful, esteem and filial respect. The questionnaire has 31 questions in all, taking advantage of Likert scale. Using this scale, its alpha reliability reach 0.887 with clear internal structure. The validity is well and the model fitting index accords with statistical measurement, which covers the shortage of empirical study on Chinese undergraduate students’ moral values. The measurement, which focused undergraduate moral values, is compiled by a total of 768 valid samples from 6 colleges. Measurement results show that there are sequences of orientation on Chinese undergraduates’ moral values approval, and the order is: Honesty and compliance, civility and discipline, filial respect unity and be helpful, love and esteem; while gender differences do exist. The male undergraduates’ identity level of honesty and compliance, civility and self-discipline, love, and filial respect ranks higher than that of female undergraduates; however, the differences, between male and female undergraduates, on unity and being helpful, as well as esteem are not significant.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Correlation between the individual’s experience of well-being and social evaluation

100%
Danylchenko T.
Journal of Education Culture and Society
|
2021
|
vol. 12
|
issue 2
179-189
EN
The aim of this paper is to define the correlation between social evaluation and personal well-being.  Methods. The study involved the citizens of Chernihiv (average age – 31.5 years old): 91 people in total, 37 men and 54 women. The following methods were used: the scale of satisfaction with life scale by Diener, as adapted by Leontiev and Osin (2008); questionnaire of parameters of subjective social well-being by Danylchenko (2015); subjective life satisfaction scale by Lybyna (2008), questionnaire on the peculiarities of evaluation by other people by Danylchenko (2019). Results and conclusion. In Ukrainian society, the most important reference groups are parents and a spouse, while friends and colleagues play a comparatively smaller role. All these groups are more likely to give positive and neutral social evaluations. However, negative evaluations are more likely to come from colleagues and friends, and positive – from family. There are differences in indicators of subjective well-being, social acceptance (as a measure of social well-being) and competence between people who are assessed predominantly positively and predominantly negatively. Subjective well-being is reduced reproaches from reference groups. Praise contributes to the enhancement of subjective social well-being Comparison with other people and the existence of a role model reduces psychological well-being. The filter for the perception of positive and negative evaluations from the social environment is a person’s self-acceptance.  
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Aprobata zapowiedziana w części narracyjnej (na materiale języka polskiego, rosyjskiego i angielskiego)

84%
Czapiga A., Rzeszowski U.
Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Linguistica Rossica
|
2015
|
vol. 11
EN
The article is devoted to the analysis of the ways of expressing the speech act of approval in Polish, Russian and English. The material has been gathered from corpora, and only the examples have been taken into consideration where the phrase uttered by a speaker is introduced in the narration part as approval. This method of collecting material gives the opportunity to avoid misunderstanding in the process of the interpretation of the speaker’s intentions. It occurs that approval introduced in the narrative part of a text is more often nonverbal in Polish and English materials. The lexical markers of the speech act under investigation display a considerable number of similarities between Polish, Russian and English examples. The utterances are usually stylistically neutral and they are generally simple in structure.
PL
Artykuł poświęcony jest analizie sposobów wyrażenia aktu mowy aprobaty w języku polskim, rosyjskim i angielskim. Materiał pochodzi z korpusów badanych języków, i obejmuje przypadki, gdy wypowiedź nadawcy jest zapowiedziana w części narracyjnej tekstu jako aprobata. Dzięki zastosowaniu tej metody zbierania materiału można uniknąć wątpliwości związanych z procesem interpretacji intencji nadawcy wypowiedzi.
4
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Słowo o amelioratywach i pejoratywach w kręgu mowy, ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem mownej aprobaty / dezaprobaty działań

84%
Bogusławski A.
Linguistica Copernicana
|
2023
|
vol. 19
41-49
EN
The author claims that whoever praises an utterance which is in his/her opinion untrue must of necessity praise something which is in his/her opinion true; e.g. his/ her opinion praising the supposedly untrue utterance. Whoever praises an utterance which is in his/her opinion true need not to praise any utterance which is in his/her opinion untrue. What all of this entails is the following: general approval of non-veracity is impossible (by being self-contradictory) whereas total approval of veracity and only this approval is non-selfcontradictory.The author presents a proportional picture of approvals and disapproval of actions. The label used are: ‘tolerance’, ‘zero tolerance’ as amelioratives, and ‘permissivism’, ‘intolerance’ as pejoratives. The attitudes denoted with the above levels are always subjective.
PL
Autor twierdzi, że ktokolwiek pochwala czyjąś wypowiedź, która jest jego zdaniem nieprawdziwa, musi z konieczności pochwalać czyjeś powiedzenie czegoś, co jest jego zdaniem prawdą; np. swoje własne zdanie chwalące ową wypowiedź nieprawdziwą. Ktokolwiek pochwala czyjąś wypowiedź, która jest jego zdaniem prawdziwa, nie musi jednocześnie pochwalać niczyjego powiedzenia czegoś, co nie jest jego zdaniem prawdą. Wszystko to łącznie stanowi o tym, że bezwzględna aprobata nieprawdomówności jest niemożliwa (jako wewnętrznie sprzeczna), podczas gdy totalna aprobata prawdomówności i tylko ona jest niesprzeczna wewnętrznie.Autor przedstawia ściśle proporcjonalny obraz aprobaty i dezaprobaty działań. Stosowane pojęcia to: ‘tolerancja’, ‘zero tolerancji’ jako amelioratywy oraz ‘permisywizm’, ‘nietolerancja’ jako pejoratywy. Postawy oznaczone powyższymi pojęciami są zawsze subiektywne.
5
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Конституція України як втілення установчої влади українського народу

67%
Martyniuk R.
Facta Simonidis
|
2021
|
vol. 14
|
issue 1
139-165
PL
Artykuł zawiera rozważania o idei władzy ustawodawczej narodu oraz o istocie konstytucji jako materialnym jej ucieleśnieniem. Analizie poddano kluczowe momenty współczesnej konstytucyjnej historii Ukrainy: przyjęcie Traktatu Konstytucyjnego 8 czerwca 1995 r., uchwalenie Konstytucji Ukrainy 28 czerwca 1996 r. oraz przyjęcie Ustawy Ukrainy “O zmianach do Konstytucji Ukrainy” począwszy od 8 grudnia 2004 r. Z punktu widzenia koncepcji władzy ustawodawczej zbadano orzeczenia Sądu Konstytucyjnego Ukrainy od 30 września 2010 r. oraz działalność “Zgromadzenia Konstytucyjnego” utworzonego w 2012 r. Zanalizowane zostały kwestie konstytucyjności i prawomocności procedury odnowienia pierwotnego tekstu Konstytucji Ukrainy od 8 grudnia 2004 roku, w tym podczas rewolucji godności 2014 roku.
EN
The article discusses the concept of the legislative power of Ukrainian people and their constitution as a material embodiment of this idea. The author analyzes such key moments of the modern constitutional history of Ukraine as the adoption of the Constitutional Treaty of June 8, 1995, the Constitution of Ukraine of June 28, 1996, and the Amendments to the Constitution of Ukraine Act of December 8, 2004. In terms of the concept of legislative power, the Decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine of September 30, 2010 and the activity of the Constitutional Assembly formed in 2012 by Viktor Yanukovych are investigated. The article also considers the issue of the constitutionality and legitimacy of the procedure for modifying the wording of the original Constitution of Ukraine of December 8, 2004 in 2014 during the Revolution of Dignity.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.