That is, about phraseologisms with a "language" component that mean obtaining information (based on the Corpus of Parliamentary Discourse from 1918–2021) In the article, I analyzed 3 Polish phraseologisms – someone grabbed / captured / gained the language // caught / grabbed / got the language (ktoś złapał / schwytał / zdobył języka // złapać / schwytać / zdobyć języka); someone inquires / inquires for language // inquires / inquires for language (ktoś zasięga / zasięgnął języka // zasięgać / zasięgnąć języka); someone pulls / pulls someone’s language // pulls / pulls someone’s language (ktoś ciągnie / pociągnął za język kogoś // ciągnąć / pociągnąć kogoś za język) – functioning in the Polish parliamentary discourse. The material comes from the Corpus of parliamentary discourse (CPD) developed at the IPI PAN, containing nearly 700 million segments. I compared CPD data – in the semantic and frequency plan – with the general Polish language (based on corpuses: NKJP, Monco.pl and „Odkrywka”). It turned out that in the case of the analyzed phraseologies, as components of the secondary nomination system, the Polish parliamentary discourse does not perform a specific semantic and turnout ‘distortion’. The analyzed phraseologisms function in CPD just like in general Polish, which is a peculiar difference compared to the research on lexemes and lexical constructions in CPD.
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.