Search results

1

Od śmierci do zmartwychwstania - od niewiary do wiary (Mk 15,42-16,20 z par.)

100%

Malina A.

Verbum Vitae

|

2009

|

vol. 15

189-208

PL

Le ricostruzioni della storia delle tradizioni sulla tomba e sulle apparizioni del Risorto si basano sull’approccio diacronico. L’articolo non respinge questo tipo d’analisi, ma cerca di precisare il rapporto fra la forma letteraria dei testi e la prospettiva teologica del Vangelo di Marco. Soltanto a partire dalla determinazione di questo rapporto si può adeguatamente cogliere il significato delle divergenze tra le versioni sinottiche come testimonianze degli incontri con il Risorto. I risultati dell’analisi sincronica possono offrire un solido punto di partenza per le indagini diacroniche.

2

Droga do Emaus drogą ku wierze w zmartwychwstanie

100%

Mielcarek K.

Verbum Vitae

|

2009

|

vol. 15

157-170

PL

The article proposes a narrative approach toward a pericope of Luke 24,13-35. By singling out three main criteria of time, space and characters the author builds a picture of a story in which Luke tells his fellow-believers about reality of Jesus’ resurrection. His narrative does not function as a definite prove of the fact of resurrection, but is thought as a kind of encouragement for Christians to meet with living and resurrected Jesus Christ truly present in the rite of breaking bread.

3

Gdy światło zmaga się z ciemnością. Symbolika światła w Mt 28,1-10

100%

Rosik M.

Verbum Vitae

|

2016

|

vol. 29

227-250

PL

Autor artykułu bada znaczenie symbolu światła w opisie chrystofanii (Mt 28,1-10). W pierwszej części kreśli zasadnicze rysy symboliki światła w tradycji biblijnej i pozabiblijnej Izraela, w drugiej natomiast stara się odczytać właściwe znaczenie owego symbolu w Mateuszowym opisie wydarzeń przy pustym grobie Jezusa. Zgodnie z wyznaczoną strukturą perykopy najpierw ukazuje, w jaki sposób rozumieć symbolikę świtu, błyskawicy i bieli w pierwszej części opisu chrystofanii (Mt 28,1-4). Analizując drugą część Mateuszowego opisu (Mt 28,5-10), odnosi się do motywów starotestamentowych, nawiązując do motywu „wyjścia” (exodusu) i analizując zabieg redakcyjny ewangelisty, by ukazać Jezusa w roli Mojżesza.

EN

The Gospel of St Matthew was addressed to the Christians of Jewish origin. Further, the symbol of light often appears within Jewish biblical and extra-biblical traditions (apocrypha, pseudoepigrapha, Qumran literature, Josephus). It is not surprising, then, to find it present also in Matthew’s description of both the empty tomb of Jesus and the Christophany which follows (Mt 28:1-10). In the article, the author examines the meaning of the symbol of light as it is employed in this passage.

4

Zmartwychwstały Chrystus - źródło zbawczych darów (Łk 24,36-49)

80%

Rosik M.

Verbum Vitae

|

2009

|

vol. 15

171-188

PL

According to Luke’s relation about the chrystophany in the cenacle (Luke 24,36-49) the Risen Lord appeared to the Apostles to transmit to them the gifts which are the results of His resurrection. The reader of this story can easily listed five of these gifts: peace, common meal (which can be understood as the indication of Eucharist), understanding of the Scripture, forgiveness of sins and finally the gift of the Holy Spirit. The locum in which one can receive these salvific gifts is paradoxally one of them: the Eucharist. The participation in the Eucharist opens human hearts to receive the others gifts which are the result of the resurrection.

5

Znaczenie pozycji aniołów w grobie Jezusa w J 20,12

61%

Kubiś A.

The Biblical Annals

|

2016

|

vol. 6

|

issue 3

459-493

EN

Compared with the Synoptics, the Johannine angels assume a particular and significant position inside Jesus’ tomb. The evangelist describes it precisely as one angel sitting at the place of Jesus’ head and another at the place of Jesus’ feet. Not all Johannine commentators pay attention to this detail, yet a comparison with the descriptions of the angels’ positions in the different synoptic narratives demonstrates that they all reflect original editorial work on the part of each the evangelist. Consequently, these accounts can – and indeed do – convey particular ideological or theological stances typical of each gospel writer, including John. With regard to John 20:12, the article surveys proposals advanced by several Johannine commentators, beginning with some very obvious and prosaic explanations and ending with the most probable meanings behind the particular posture of Johannine angels. According to a strictly archeological-historical explanation, the position of the Johannine angles is no more than an indication that Jesus’ burial place was not a tomb of kôkîm type. The article also presents allegorical interpretations, from St. Augustine to St. Thomas Aquinas; a religious-cultural exposition referring to the Egyptian goddesses Isis and Nephthys; a few very literal explanations accentuating the physical emptiness between the angels; and an intertextual exposition based on a targumic reading of Isaiah 6. At the end, as the most persuasive solution, the article proposes that the Johannine angels represent the cherubs of the Ark of the Covenant and the mercy seat. This intertextual and symbolic interpretation likewise explains Mary Magdalene’s lack of fear and astonishment in her interaction with supernatural beings.

PL

Compared with the Synoptics, the Johannine angels assume a particular and significant position inside Jesus’ tomb. The evangelist describes it precisely as one angel sitting at the place of Jesus’ head and another at the place of Jesus’ feet. Not all Johannine commentators pay attention to this detail, yet a comparison with the descriptions of the angels’ positions in the different synoptic narratives demonstrates that they all reflect original editorial work on the part of each the evangelist. Consequently, these accounts can – and indeed do – convey particular ideological or theological stances typical of each gospel writer, including John. With regard to John 20,12, the article surveys proposals advanced by several Johannine commentators, beginning with some very obvious and prosaic explanations and ending with the most probable meanings behind the particular posture of Johannine angels. According to a strictly archeological-historical explanation, the position of the Johannine angles is no more than an indication that Jesus’ burial place was not a tomb of kôkîm type. The article also presents allegorical interpretations, from St. Augustine to St. Thomas Aquinas; a religious-cultural exposition referring to the Egyptian goddesses Isis and Nephthys; a few very literal explanations accentuating the physical emptiness between the angels; and an intertextual exposition based on a targumic reading of Isaiah 6. At the end, as the most persuasive solution, the article proposes that the Johannine angels represent the cherubs of the Ark of the Covenant and the mercy seat. This intertextual and symbolic interpretation likewise explains Mary Magdalene’s lack of fear and astonishment in her interaction with supernatural beings.

Refine search results

4 Verbum Vitae

1 The Biblical Annals

2 Rosik M.

1 Kubiś A.

1 Malina A.

1 Mielcarek K.

2 2016

3 2009

Od śmierci do zmartwychwstania - od niewiary do wiary (Mk 15,42-16,20 z par.)

Droga do Emaus drogą ku wierze w zmartwychwstanie

Gdy światło zmaga się z ciemnością. Symbolika światła w Mt 28,1-10

Zmartwychwstały Chrystus - źródło zbawczych darów (Łk 24,36-49)

Znaczenie pozycji aniołów w grobie Jezusa w J 20,12