Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Journals help

  1. 1 Studia Iuridica Lublinensia

Authors help

  1. 1 Nowosad A.

Years help

  1. 1 2020

Results found: 1

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  concurrent offences
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Gloss to the Judgement of the Constitutional Tribunal of 11 June 2019 (P 20/17, OTK-A 2019, Item 29)

100%
Nowosad A.
Studia Iuridica Lublinensia
|
2020
|
vol. 29
|
issue 3
EN
The author agrees with the Constitutional Tribunal’s opinion that Article 87 § 1 of the Penal Code to the extent that it imposes an obligation on the court to combine imprisonment and restriction of liberty and to impose a total penalty of deprivation of liberty after converting the penalty of restriction of liberty into imprisonment is inconsistent with the Constitution of the Republic of Poland. In addition, the author raised the problem of ratio legis of Article 87 of the Penal Code and indicated why the deficiencies in regulation were noticed so late in the case law.
PL
Autorka podziela stanowisko Trybunału Konstytucyjnego, że art. 87 § 1 k.k. w zakresie, w jakim nakłada na sąd obowiązek połączenia kar pozbawienia wolności i ograniczenia wolności oraz wymierzenia kary łącznej pozbawienia wolności po dokonaniu zamiany kary ograniczenia wolności na karę pozbawienia wolności, jest niezgodny z Konstytucją RP. Dodatkowo poruszono problem ratio legis art. 87 k.k. i wskazano, dlaczego tak późno w orzecznictwie zostały dostrzeżone mankamenty regulacji.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.