Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  creative function
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
100%
EN
One way of defining the functions of the parliamentary opposition is to connect them with the functions of the organ in which parliamentary opposition carries out its activities. An analysis of the participation of the opposition in filling of functions on the example of the Polish parliament has already been made, but the research has focused only on the constitutional functions of the Sejm, i.e. the legislative and control functions. For this reason, the aim of this article is to analyse the participation of the opposition in filling of the third, no less important function, which is the creative function. Addressing this issue also stems from the fact that many institutional changes have been introduced in recent years, creating new state organs and changing – in the case of some – the rules of their appointment. In view of the above, the author’s intention was to answer the question whether the status of the opposition had changed as a result of the reforms carried out. Because the lower house of the parliament plays a dominant role in this sphere, the study focuses on the analysis of the participation of the opposition appearing in the Sejm.
EN
The author undertakes to establish the legal title to performing the creative function by the two chambers of Polish Parliament as a representative of the nation. The article describes the competence of the Sejm and the Senate as the constitutional authorities of the State that perform the creative function. The creative function of the Parliament may be considered as a result of the activities of this institution for other institutions as well as the functioning of the whole system. Voters’ crisis of confidence in the both chambers of Polish Parliament may also be understood as a crisis of its functions.
PL
Celem niniejszego artykułu jest przedstawienie proponowanych zmian Konstytucji RP z 1997 r. w zakresie kadencji i funkcji Sejmu i Senatu w Polsce. Przeprowadzona analiza wskazuje, że przepisy zawarte w konstytucjach Czech i Słowacji są w tym zakresie bardziej precyzyjne, między innymi wyraźniej określają kompetencje kreacyjne parlamentu w stosunku do organów władzy sądowniczej. Ponadto czeskie regulacje dotyczące Senatu pozwalają na wzmocnienie jego pozycji względem pierwszej izby parlamentu, między innymi ze względu na jego większą rolę w procedurze ustawodawczej. Z kolei przepisy zawarte w Konstytucji słowackiej zabezpieczają parlament przed zaniechaniami ze strony głowy państwa. Te unormowania powinny być wzorem przy dokonywaniu zmian polskiej ustawy zasadniczej.
EN
The scope of this article is to show the proposed amendments to the Constitution of the Republic of Poland of 1997 with regard to the term and functions of the Sejm and the Senate in Poland. The analysis shows that the provisions of the constitutions of Czechia and Slovakia are more precise, among other things, they more clearly define the parliament’s creative function in relation to the organs of the judicial power. Moreover, the Czech regulation concerning the Senate allows it to strengthen its political significance and position in relation to the first chamber of parliament, i.a. because of its greater role in the legislative procedure. In turn, the provisions contained in the Slovak Constitution protect the parliament against omissions of the head of state. These regulations should serve as a model for amending the Polish basic law.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.