Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  creditors
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
PL
The restructuring law in force in Poland for two years is still a young branch of law, mainly based on bankruptcy law, which is referred to by the judiciary and doctrine. However, despite the many similarities that combine somehow the two legal acts, i.e. the restructuring law and the bankruptcy law, one should point to some differences already existing at the foundation of these legal acts, i.e. the principles on which they were based. These principles constituted the basis for legislative work, as well as now constitute the main interpretation of the restructuring law. The main purpose of restructuring proceedings is to preserve the debtor’s enterprise, which, as a consequence, generates a lot of positive effects, in this that it helps to achieve the second of the prime objectives of the proceeding, i.e. to satisfy the debtor’s creditors. Other important measures that are supposed to be a consequence of the application of regulations based on the principles described in this article are also those affecting the awareness and mentality of entrepreneurs, among whom there is still a widespread belief that filing for bankruptcy involves bankruptcy, the inability to recover their debts, which causes frequent lack of willingness to take active actions on the part of creditors. Restricting the restructuring law on the described principles is to provide multiple benefits – ensure the debtor’s further existence, satisfy the creditors and maintain stability in the economic market.  
EN
Ever since the last financial crisis, the efficiency of financial markets has been widely challenged. On the basis of sovereign debt markets in the European Monetary Union (EMU), we tried to contrast some reservations about the market efficiency existing in the literature with findings coming from our empirical analysis of weak-form efficiency. To do so, we first outlined the crux of the efficient market hypothesis. Secondly, we show the main reservations in relation to this concept. Then, after a brief review of outcomes from contributions in this area, we conducted a three-stage empirical procedure that Worthington and Higgs (2006) as well as Borges (2009) had employed to stock markets analysis. Then, the results were evaluated and conclusions were drawn. To sum up, we did confirm the weak-form efficiency on examined sovereign debt markets from the EMU. That suggests that a random process plays a key role in shaping bond yields. Finally, neither theoretical nor practical reservations deflate the weak-form efficiency in the public debt markets of the EMU.
EN
The issue of the effectiveness of collateral established on the taxpayer’s assets, which was subsequently declared bankrupt by the bankruptcy court, raises numerous controversies and practical problems. Contrary to the position of the Voivodship Administrative Court in Białystok, it cannot be assumed that safeguards established under tax regulations take precedence over the principles of bankruptcy law and are enforceable and effective also after the taxpayer’s bankruptcy has been declared. The adoption of such a solution would mean that a particular class of creditors would be favoured. Thus, bearing in mind the respect of these principles in civil and criminal proceedings, the position of the Voivodship Administrative Court in Białystok in Białystok should be considered erroneous and priority should be given to the regulations of the bankrupt cy law before the regulations of tax law.
PL
Problematyka skuteczności zabezpieczeń ustanawianych na majątku podatnika, co do którego następnie sąd upadłościowy ogłosił upadłość, budzi liczne kontrowersje i problemy natury praktycznej. Wbrew stanowisku Wojewódzkiego Sądu Administracyjnego (WSA) w Białymstoku1 nie można przyjąć założenia, że zabezpieczenia ustanowione w trybie regulacji podatkowych mają pierwszeństwo przed zasadami prawa upadłościowego oraz są wykonalne i skuteczne także po ogłoszeniu upadłości podatnika. Przyjęcie takiego rozwiązania oznaczałoby uprzywilejowanie określonej grupy wierzycieli. Tym samym, mając na uwadze respektowanie tych zasad w postępowaniu cywilnym i karnym, należy uznać stanowisko WSA w Białymstoku za błędne i dać pierwszeństwo regulacjom prawa upadłościowego przed regułami prawa podatkowego.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.