Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 10

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  culturalism
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The text defi nes such notions as culture, cultural studies, fundamental sciences, and culturalism. It argues that cultural studies are fundamental sciences in three important senses: 1) theoretical (the object of research of science has its inevitable cultural dimension), 2) practical (the ability to manipulate signs, symbols, information and other products of culture is crucial in the age of cognitive capitalism), and also 3) axiological (in the context of contemporary ecological risks we cannot aim at further conquest of Nature, but we should rather try to understand mechanisms shaping various spheres of culture: economics, religion, tradition, art, politics and science).
EN
From Znaniecki’s point of view, and alluding to present-day conclusions about the so-called reflexivity of modernity, one would have to say that it is a problematic reflexivity, as long as knowledge about the principles of cultural becoming will be minimal. Znaniecki did not deny the justification of sociological studies that start out from naturalist premises. However, he rightly believed that the dependence of cultural order on natural order is not only shrinking, but the reverse is in fact happening-there is an increasing influence of cultural order on natural order, and the rising complexity of cultural phenomena renders the naturalist approach scientifically less productive. The development of sociology as a cultural science led, according to Znaniecki, to displaying the possibility of a world-society as a society founded on culture, while the development of cultural sciences would be an expression of global responsibility for the world-culture society.
EN
Though the classical influence and the culturalist poetry cannot be reduced solely to the use of transtextual procedures, this practice represents a device that fits perfectly within the poetic uses; it helps to build theaestheticinherent to the postmodernthought; and it is raised as the prin­cipal representative of this poetic style. In this succinct approach, two metapoetic reflections on the inclusion of intertexts are shown as a paradigm, to make clear that the positions of the poets against intertextuality are mixed, but are equally successful in the postmodern ideology in which much of theproduction of contemporary Spanish poetry is included.
EN
The goal of the text is to reconstruct the concept of cultural normativity found in the phenomenological philosophy of law. The starting point of the text is the distinction between cultural normativity and normativity in culture. This distinction is based on reference to an extra-cultural, but not non-human instance – transcendent to the creations of humanity and its world, but in relations with the human equipment, with the characteristics of a specific human being and its existence. The specific relations between cultural and legal normativity can be found in phenomenological concepts of law, which draw on the Husserlian transcendentalism and essentialism. The phenomenology of law attempts to answer the question of the sources, and the ontological and epistemological status of normativity as such. Normativity as a written and unwritten set of norms is characterized by phenomenologists with reference to value and axiology. The values are assumed by them as certain fixed reference points (“horizon of values” given to be recognized), because norms make it possible to establish rules for various individual and collective practices within a particular community and culture on the basis of values.
EN
The aim of this paper is to present the cultural psychology project formulated by Florian Znaniecki. In the first part of the article, the authoress reconstructs the origin of this concept by reviewing the scholar’s early philosophical writings. In the second and third part of this paper, the authoress focuses on presenting the basic categories of Znaniecki’s theory such as culture, culturalism and cultural action and highlights the role of cultural psychology in his scientific system.
PL
W artykule zaproponowano i zaprezentowano koncepcję sześciu znaczeń miejskiej przestrzeni publicznej: użytkowego, interakcyjnego, obywatelskiego i politycznego, aksjologicznego, symbolicznego oraz tożsamościowego. Zostały one wyróżnione w oparciu o dane uzyskane w trakcie kilku autorskich i współautorskich projektów badawczych dotyczących społecznego funkcjonowania i doświadczania przestrzeni publicznych prowadzonych w różnych miastach Polski w latach 2010–2017. Podstawę teoretyczną artykułu stanowią założenia kulturalistycznego i socjoprzestrzennego nurtu w socjologii miasta podkreślające relacyjność człowieka i społeczności w stosunku do użytkowanej przez nich przestrzeni.
EN
The article presents the idea of the six roles of urban public space. These roles are: utility, interactive, civic and political, axiological, symbolic and identical. Their identification is based on data obtained from several research projects conducted by the author and co-authors, which concerned the social functioning and experiencing of public spaces by the inhabitants in various Polish cities in the years 2010–2017. The theoretical basis of the article was formed on the assumptions of culturalism and the socio-spatial approach to urban sociology, which emphasize the relationship of individuals and their community with respect to the spaces they utilize, individually and collectively
DE
Der Artikel konzentriert sich auf den Spannungen zwischen den kulturalistischen und individualistischen Tendenzen im nordamerikanischen bioethischen Diskurs. Er beschreibt und untersucht die Beispiele der Entstehung des Kulturalismus in der Bioethik in den USA und in Kanada. Die auf dem Begriff der Autonomie des Patienten beruhende Bioethik wird überwiegend mit der westlichen Kultur assoziiert, während der Kulturalismus den kulturellen Bioethiken in anderen Weltteilen ˗ Lateinamerika, Asien und Afrika ˗ zugeschrieben wird. Der Verfasser des Artikels kommt jedoch entgegen dieser Überzeugung zum Schluss, dass eine kulturalistische Einstellung zur Bioethik den westlichen Ländern, wo sie mit den Prozessen der Bildung von Gruppen-, Subkultur- oder Nationalidentität einhergeht, nicht fremd ist. Die Bioethik wird zum Medium der Entstehung, Verstärkung und Verwirklichung von kulturellen Unterschieden.
EN
The article focuses on tensions between cultural and individualistic tendencies in the North American bioethical discourse. Described and analyzed are examples of how culturalism developed in US and Canadian bioethics. Bioethics based on the concept of the patient’s autonomy is usually associated with Western culture, while culturalism as such is generally attributed to cultural bioethics evolved in other parts of the world, notably in Latin America, Asia and Africa. However, contrary to such a notion, an analysis of this phenomenon indicates that a culturalistic approach to bioethics is not alien to western countries as it has been combined there with group, sub-cultural or national identity formation processes. Bioethics is indeed becoming a medium of producing, strengthening and shaping cultural differences.
PL
Artykuł koncentruje się na napięciach między tendencjami kulturalistycznymi i indywidualistycznymi w północnoamerykańskim dyskursie bioetycznym. Opisuje i analizuje przykłady formowania się kulturalizmu w bioetyce USA i Kanady. Bioetyka opierająca się na pojęciu autonomii pacjenta jest przeważnie kojarzona z kulturą zachodnią, podczas gdy kulturalizm przypisuje się bioetykom kulturowym, rozwijanym w innych częściach świata, Ameryce Łacińskiej, Azji i Afryce. W świetle przeprowadzonej analizy, a wbrew temu poglądowi, stwierdzić jednak można, że kulturalistyczne podejście do bioetyki nie jest obce krajom zachodnim, gdzie łączy się z procesami kształtowania się tożsamości grupowej, subkulturowej czy też narodowej. Bioetyka staje się medium wytwarzania, wzmacniania i realizowania różnic kulturowych.
EN
This article presents the ideas coined by Wolfgang Maderthaner and Lutz Musner who diagnosed a‘‘crisis in cultural studies”. According to those authors, representing historical cultural studies, it is proved by meaningful absence of social aspects of culture. It was caused by the dominance of culturalism giving preference to the world of meaning, text, and picture. Therefore Maderthaner and Musner are sceptical about cultural turn and other turns. The Austrian academic duo, inspired by Pierre’a Bourdieu, demand social, economic and political aspects to undergo more detailed scrutiny while analyzing the realm of culture. Otherwise the cultural scientists risk becoming the prisoners of an “Ivory Tower” or being subordinated to the dominant economic power. It would be equal with “selfanihilation of reason”, however, they are meant to use it in the best and most useful way.
PL
W artykule stawiam tezę o potencjale zmiany normatywnego porządku rzeczywistości szkolnej, który tkwi w wybranych zachowaniach uczestników i uczestniczek życia szkolnego. Opisuję go przez pryzmat neoklasycznie odczytanego typu biograficznego zboczeńca, jednego z typów wyróżnionych przez Floriana Znanieckiego w pracy Ludzie teraźniejsi a cywilizacja przyszłości. Perspektywą teoretyczną badań, na podstawie których stawiam tę tezę, jest kulturalizm. Strategią pozyskiwania i analizy danych: etnografia. W zakończeniu przywołuję koncepcję subwersji znaczeń Juditch Buttler, jako propozycję użycia języka do zmiany myślenia i konstruowania rzeczywistości.
EN
In the article I put the thesis about the potential for the change of the normative order of the school reality, which is present in the selected behaviour patterns of the school life’s participants. I describe it through the prism of the neoclassically understood type of the biographical pervert, one of the types distinguished by Florian Znaniecki in Contemporary People and the Civilization of the Future. The theoretical perspective of the research, I base my thesis on, is culturalism. The strategy for obtaining and analyzing data is ethnography. In conclusion I mention Judith Buttler’s concept of the subversion of meaning, as the proposal for using the language to change the way we think and construct reality.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.