Results found: 2

Search results

Search:
in the keywords: developmental disproportions

Sort By:

Limit search:

Poland A and Poland B – Developmental Disproportions on Polish Lands in the 19th and 20th c. (Prior to 1939).

100%

Grata P.

Analecta Archaeologica Ressoviensia

2018

vol. 13

33-48

The problem of developmental disproportions occurring within a state is not an uncommon phenomenon, and the case of Polish lands is one example of it. As a result of numerous disadvantageous conditions, Polish lands experienced dramatic developmental differences, which fully came to light in the interwar period, when the territories which had belonged to the three partitioners of Poland were incorporated into the Second Polish Republic. The disproportions were so deep that a much better developed Poland A and a much more backward Poland B (situated east of the Vistula River) were distinguished in the state. The scale of the differences was reflected in many economic and social indices, ranging from population density, to the degree of urbanisation processes and sources of population income, to the state of transportation infrastructure, to the involvement of workforce, to the production of basic goods. An attempt to reduce the disproportions was the establishment of the Central Industrial District in the mid-1930s and the Fifteen Year Plan for the state’s development prepared by Deputy Prime Minister Eugeniusz Kwiatkowski (1888–1974). These plans were thwarted by the outbreak of WWII, and the developmental disproportions on Polish lands, despite the post-war change of state borders, remain visible even today, especially in territories that were part of Poland B before 1939 (today Podkarpacie, Lubelskie, Podlasie Voivodeships).

Terytorializacja polityki rozwoju regionu dolnośląskiego

81%

Obrębalski M.

Rozwój Regionalny i Polityka Regionalna

2020

issue 49

79-96

The region of Lower Silesia presents numerous developmental disproportions. The purpose of the article is not only to indicate them, but in particular to present the possibilities and scope ofterritorial oriented self-governmental instruments of policy for development of that region. This policy, conducted, among others by the regional self-government, requires appropriate multi-dimensional territorialisation, and especially territorial orientation of the voivodship’s development strategy, territorial dedication of financial instruments for its implementation and changes in the statistical division of the voivodship into two support regions. This approach in the context of the new EU 2020+ programming perspective is expected by the local authorities and administration, especially the Sudeten region.

Region dolnośląski charakteryzuje się wieloma dysproporcjami rozwojowymi. Celem artykułu jest nie tylko ich wskazanie, lecz w szczególności przedstawienie możliwości i zakresu terytorialnego ukierunkowania samorządowego instrumentarium polityki rozwoju tegoż regionu. Polityka ta prowadzona m.in. przez samorząd województwa wymaga odpowiedniej wielowymiarowej terytorializacji, a zwłaszcza terytorialnego ukierunkowania strategii rozwoju województwa, terytorialnych dedykacji finansowych instrumentów jej wdrażania i zmian statystycznego podziału województwa na dwa regiony wsparcia. Podejście takie w kontekście nowej perspektywy unijnego programowania 2020+ oczekiwane jest przez władze i administrację samorządową, zwłaszcza regionu sudeckiego.

Refine search results

1 Analecta Archaeologica Ressoviensia

1 Rozwój Regionalny i Polityka Regionalna

1 Grata P.

1 Obrębalski M.

1 2020

1 2018

Search results

Poland A and Poland B – Developmental Disproportions on Polish Lands in the 19th and 20th c. (Prior to 1939).

Terytorializacja polityki rozwoju regionu dolnośląskiego