Results found: 2

Search results

Search:
in the keywords: diarist

Sort By:

Limit search:

Ukrainian diary in diaspora: aspects of the linguistic norm

100%

Syrko I.

Pomiędzy. Polonistyczno-Ukrainoznawcze Studia Naukowe

2022

issue 6(3)

45-51

The article deals with the specific features of the diary discourse of M. Halaburda-Chyhryn as a linguistic personality functioning in emigration. It has been found out, that in her diary there are lexical “anglicisms” denoting notions, which are easier to perceive through the prism of English, though they have equivalents in Ukrainian. The author retains “authenticity” of the English prototypes,“naturalizes” the foreign language elements, uses word for word translated “anglicisms” etc. Calked borrowings from English are explained by the functional, ideological, psychological isolation of the Ukrainian language in Diaspora. The use of such words reflects the bilingual`s spontaneous speech. The author often resorts to transcriptional reproduction of words by the Russian phonetic prototype to focus on the negative evaluation of events. Their spelling reflects non-normative pronunciation. There are deviations from Ukrainian grammatical rules caused by interaction with the language of the country of settlement: use of one preposition instead of another, use of passive constructions etc. The frequency of pluperfect tense form is explained by the existence of perfect tenses in the dominant language. Lexical parallelism becomes noticeable when two objective realities are compared. The most illustrative are “russisms” and “polonisms”. Many of them have roots in English. Along with “anglicisms” we come across purisms which make diaspora members the defenders of their native language. There are also lexical archaisms: preservation of letter “e” in the words of foreign origin; use of soft “л”; transmission of diphthongs “au”, “ou” through “ав”, “ов” in accordance with the pronunciation; transmission of final “tr”, “dr” through “тер”, “дер”; preservation of prothetic “г” before vowels in foreign words; transmission of “θ” through the letter “т”in the words of Greek origin; use of letter “ґ” to refer to the phoneme [ґ] both in both Ukrainian and borrowed words. Сonclusions have been drawn, that the language of Ukrainian diaspora diary is a fact of the history of the Ukrainian literary language, a product of its development and a source of its renewal at the same time.

Діарист як творець документальної медіації

84%

Bovsunivska T.

Studia Polsko-Ukraińskie

2021

vol. 8

61-68

The paper is devoted to the study of mediation and mediators in ego-documentary prose. The are nine possibilities of mediation formation in the diary (Taras Shevchenko’s “Diary” is taken as a sample): 1) by means of memories, 2) as dictated by heart, 3) by means of emotional temporitum, 4) through the actualization of personalities, 5) as an imitation of the previous genre form, 6) as revision of the past, 7) in dreams, 8) by means of language expression, 9) by using the Bible. Shevchenko’s journal is characterized by the movement of everyday life to the realm of the transcendent. If in the literature of Romanticism the mediators are usually located in the transcendent, then in Shevchenko to this classical landmark of the Romantics is added everyday life as dreamed and transcendent.

Refine search results

1 Pomiędzy. Polonistyczno-Ukrainoznawcze Studia Naukowe

1 Studia Polsko-Ukraińskie

1 Bovsunivska T.

1 Syrko I.

1 2022

1 2021

Search results

Ukrainian diary in diaspora: aspects of the linguistic norm

Діарист як творець документальної медіації