Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 5

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  directiveness
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
Power in organizations creates interpersonal settings and lays the ground for designating individual roles and positions of superiors and subordinates. In such a context, influence tactics are situation-specific behaviors used to change the behavior of others and achieve organizational goals. The notion that power and influence can be based on personal or positional variables was used to design the framework of the present studies intended to describe how trait- and state-like variables are related to influence tactics and deinfluentization. The subjects were 250 Polish managers. Study 1 (n = 250) was undertaken to collect data about the influence tactics of Polish managers to fill the void in information in the field of social psychology in organizations. In Study 2 (n = 104) we correlated influence tactics with the personal sense of power. The results proved that the perception of having the ability to exert power over others was positively related to rational persuasion, apprising, and pressure. In Study 3 (n = 69) we investigated the relationships of influence tactics and deinfluentization with the Big Five and directiveness. The results showed that Neuroticism was positively correlated with pressure, legitimating, and coalition, but negatively with rational persuasion and consultation. Extraversion was positively correlated with rational persuasion, so was Conscientiousness. Agreeableness was negatively related to coalition. Directiveness was in a positive relation with pressure but correlated negatively with personal appeals. Deinfluentization positively correlated with Agreeableness and negatively with directiveness.
EN
The aim of the presented research was to answer the question whether people working as teachers differ from other professionals in terms of the sense of and need for power and directiveness. The study group consisted of 198 teachers, while the control group included 156 people from other occupations. The research procedure included: the SPS Sense of Power Scale (Anderson, John, & Keltner, 2012), the Index of Personal Reactions (Bennett, 1988), the SD Direc- tiveness Scale (Ray, 1976) and an extended metric. Teachers had significantly higher results in terms of directiveness, sense of power in the family, sense of power towards colleagues, sense of power towards the supervisor, need for power and resistance to submission. Teachers had significantly lower results in the area of need for influence.
EN
This paper examines the relation between “directiveness” and levels of religiosity (conceptualized as the three dimensions of “closing–opening,” “clericalization–secularization,” and “dogmatism–permissiveness”). The model used has been empirically verified and is a consequence of previous studies proving that religiosity in itself generates both pro-social attitudes (especially in regard to an individual’s own religious group) and attitudes of aggression toward “outgroups.” Researchers have also demonstrated that religion can be a factor that inhibits actual aggression through values such as self-control of negative emotions or impulsive acts. This study finds that the model presented is statistically significant in terms of dimensions such as “closing–opening” and clericalization– secularization: higher directiveness makes it possible to predict higher “closing” and clericalization. This finding makes it possible to discuss directiveness as a foundation for real aggression and attitudes of discrimination against individuals or groups that pose a symbolic or real threat to the unity of the Roman Catholic community.
EN
In the article the Stanisław Witkewicz`s figure is presented from the perspective of one of his private roles – the father role. The items discussed in the paper concern relations between the father and the only son Stanisław Ignacy, what way Witkacy the son was perceived by the father, and what were Witkewicz`s priority parental rules which he was governed by in his only child`s upbringing. The analysis are made on the grounds of the letters from Witkiewicz to his son and another family correspondence, and the article is the continuation of the subject originated by Małgorzata Król who has studied the personas of Wincenty Pol and Gustaw Zieliński in such a context.
PL
W artykule Autorka prezentuje Stanisława Witkiewicza w jednej z jego prywatnych ról – w roli ojca. Pokazuje, jakie relacje łączyły ojca z jedynym synem – Stanisławem Ignacym, jak układały się stosunki pomiędzy tymi dwiema wybitnymi osobowościami, jak postrzegany był Witkacy przez ojca oraz jakimi priorytetami kierował się ojciec w wychowaniu jedynaka. Na podstawie korpusu listów do syna oraz innej korespondencji familijnej Autorka szkicuje portret Witkiewicza-ojca. Artykuł stanowi kontynuację tematu zapoczątkowanego przez Małgorzatę Król, dotyczącego ojców: Wincentego Pola i Gustawa Zielińskiego.
EN
The presented article concerns the differences between women serving in disposable groups and women civilians, in the level of directiveness, level of anxiety as a trait and as a state and preferred styles of coping with stress. The subjects were two groups of women with a total of sixty people (parallel groups). The hypothesis concerning the differences in the intensity of directiveness (higher directiveness of women from disposable groups) and the hypothesis regarding the differences in styles of coping with stress (greater preferences of the emotion-oriented style and avoidant-social coping style in the group of civilian women) were confirmed.
PL
Prezentowana praca dotyczy różnic pomiędzy kobietami służącymi w grupach dyspozycyjnych a kobietami cywilami, w poziomie nasilenia dyrektywności, lęku jako cechy i jako stanu oraz przyjmowanych stylach radzenia sobie ze stresem. Osobami badanymi były dwie grupy kobiet o łącznej liczbie sześćdziesięciu osób (grupy równoliczne). Potwierdziła się hipoteza dotycząca różnic nasileniu dyrektywności (wyższa dyrektywność kobiet z grup dyspozycyjnych) oraz częściowo hipoteza dotycząca różnic w stylach radzenia sobie ze stresem (większe preferencje stylu skoncentrowanego na emocjach i poszukiwania kontaktów towarzyskich w grupie kobiet cywilów).
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.