Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  docetism
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
Ignatius of Antioch condemned Docetist doctrine as a heresy which was destroying Christianity. That doctrine made doubts in the orthodox knowledge. Docetist proponents did not believe that Christ had become a man in order to save the humanity. What they accepted was that He remained God and nothing but God while appeared in the world. The Catholic Church resolved that problem during the Council of Chalcedon in 451 by proclaiming Christ to be one person in two natures. The article presents the views of St. Ignatius whose anti-Docetost polemics strongly contributed to recover Catholic Creed in Jesus Christ the Son Of God who came to live on the Earth for the salvation of all people. The teachings of St. Ignatius justify the thesis that Christ truly, not apparently, was born, suffered, died, and rose for eternal life.
Vox Patrum
|
2000
|
vol. 38
83-92
EN
Die gnostische Christołogie in den Handbuchern der patristischen Theologie wird am haufigsten mit dem Doketismus dargestelit. Eine Anzahl von Nag Hammadi-Texten weist wirklich eine mehr oder weniger starke doketistische Tendenz auf.
EN
The article deals with the theme of theological reflection on Mary in the oldest Patristic texts written by St. Ignatius of Antioch, St. Justin martyr and St. Irenaeus, bishop of Lyons. It presents the strong ties of Mariology and Christology in all three authors. St. Ignatius decidedly rejects the teaching of the Docetists and shows that it was Mary who gave birth to Christ, giving Him a real human body that allowed Him later to suffer and die. St. Justin juxtaposes the works of Eve and Mary, and the birth of Jesus Christ from the Virgin is elucidated in the light of Old Testament prophecies. Finally, St. Irenaeus, in the context of the polemic with Gnosticism, deepens the parallel between Eve and Mary, taking into account also the comparison between Adam and Christ. As Adam had been formed from the virginal earth, so Christ, the new Adam was formed from the Virgin Mary, who through her faith and obedience opened to humanity the way to new life.
PL
Artykuł podejmuje temat refleksji mariologicznej w najstarszych tekstach patrystycznych autorstwa św. Ignacego Antiocheńskiego, św. Justyna męczennika i św. Ireneusza, biskupa Lyonu. Ukazuje mocne powiązanie mariologii z chrystologią u wszystkich trzech autorów. Św. Ignacy odrzuca zdecydowanie nauczanie doketów i ukazuje, że Maryja zrodziła Chrystusa, dała Mu prawdziwe ciało ludzkie, które później pozwoliło Mu cierpieć i umrzeć. U św. Justyna pojawia się przeciwstawienie dzieła Ewy i Maryi, a narodzenie Jezusa Chrystusa z Dziewicy ukazane jest w świetle zapowiedzi starotestamentalnych. Z kolei św. Ireneusz pogłębia w kontekście polemiki z gnostycyzmem paralelizm Ewa – Maryja, biorąc pod uwagę także porównanie między Adamem i Chrystusem. Jak Adam został uformowany z dziewiczej ziemi, tak Chrystus, nowy Adam, został ukształtowany z Dziewicy Maryi, która przez swoją wiarę i posłuszeństwo otworzyła rodzajowi ludzkiemu drogę do nowego życia.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.