Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Results found: 1

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  early medieval hillfort,
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The results presented in this article were created as part of a thematically focused long-term Czech-Polish project Stratygrafia wybrannych grodów najstarszego państwa Przemyślidów i Piastów w świetle porównawczych badań nieinwazyjnych. This working project was based on the systematic cooperation of the geophysicist of the Institute of Archaeology of CAS in Prague (Roman Křivánek) and the archaeologists of Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology of PAS in Warsaw/Poznan (Michał Kara) and the Museum of the First Piasts at Lednica (Arkadiusz Tabaka and other MPP archaeologists). In spite of the minimal financial background, based on practically only the means of inter-academic exchange, a collection of archaeogeophysical results from several Polish early medieval fortified sites and their background has been collected during the last decade. The cooperation of geophysicists with archaeologists in the geophysical monitoring of early medieval hillforts was in some cases supplemented by the results of new and older archaeological researches. Examples of non-destructive geophysical measurements of early medieval (possibly polycultural) sites managed by the Museum of the First Piasts at Lednica were chosen for the periodical published by the MPP. The results of two different geophysical methods (magnetometer and resistivity measurement) are presented in selected results. Between 2009 and 2011, caesium magnetometer Smartmag SM-4g (Scintrex) was used for area measurements, and in the following years a fi vechannel fl uxgate gradiometer (Sensys). Resistivity measurements were performed using RM15 (Geoscan Research) apparatus with Wenner arrangement of electrodes A0.5M0.5N0.5B. A third geophysical method – profile measurements using Cobra-WIFI radar (Radarteam) was also applied to other sub-areas of two sites (Giecz and Lednica). On the one hand, the annexes of the article contain plans of sites with plots of all geophysically monitored areas within the sites, on the other, it contains examples of geophysical measurements showing and commenting on the most significant identified anomalies or also unknown subsurface situations. In the case of the Dziekanowice site, the fields outside the archaeological park with the reconstruction of the palisade fortifications were verified by magnetometer measurements. The result was the confirmed continuation of settlement (and locally also groups of burnt-out situations or relics of production features), not only on the higher terrace, but also on the lower terrain closer to the lake. In the northern area of the Dziekanowice Museum, a large number of anomalies related to the intensive polycultural settlement of the terrace over the lake, but also to a large number of recent disturbances, metals and various excavations or power lines, which have been identified by the magnetic field survey. In the case of the Dziekanowice site on the southern peninsula of the castle and the ethnographic open-air museum, a new potential site was confirmed by a combination of magnetometer and resistivity measurements, which could be intentionally reinforced or fortified along the perimeter of the peninsula with a raised terrace. However, the inner situation within the park meadow peninsula is less clear from the non-destructive prospection and without clear archaeological findings. More geophysical measurements were carried out inside and outside the Giecz hillfort. Th e results of surveys inside the hillfort were limited to a different extent by modern landscaping (park, electrification, new roads, landfills, metals). In the present example of areal magnetometer measurement on the western bailey (site no. 4), a large number of anomalies of different origins were distinguished. Some of the line structures may be related to the outer fortification of the hillfort, other lines were caused by the recently reinforced roads or by an amelioration area. Numerous groups of small, different magnetic anomalies then indicated a large extent of external settlement and apparently a burial ground cemetery, again with local contamination of surfaces by metals and the consequences of earlier exploratory research. An example of the result of a magnetometer survey of the inner surface of the Grzybowo hillfort can, then, serve as an alarming evidence of how the shallow subsurface layers of the site can be contaminated. Recent scattered metals, repeatedly burnt fi res for many years after clearing the bushes and other consequences of modern land use for various public events caused most of the magnetic anomalies. Only in the northern less contaminated part were disturbing magnetic anomalies, the torsion anomalies of the ditch division of the hillfort, and within, the concentrated sunken features, differentiated. In the case of the Lednica hillfort in the middle of the Lake of Lednica, several different geophysical measurements were also carried out over several years. The results of the magnetometer measurements and resistivity survey of the southern and western surroundings of the acropolis have been published. An example of partial resistivity measurements on the northern bailey over the terrace edge to lower terrains along the island’s shores is largely linked to the resistivity survey results west of the acropolis. Repeating strips of high resistivity on the west, north and east flat banks are likely to prove targeted reinforcement (protection) of banks along the perimeter of the bailey, and the course of the paved path outside the bailey terrace cannot be excluded. In the case of Wielka Ledniczka on a smaller wooded island with a central motte south of the Lednica hillfort, similar situations along the shores (as of Lednica) have been identified on a flat area along the perimeter of the island. The combination of magnetometer and resistivity measurements are apparently confirmed by bands of the higher resistivity relics of reinforcement or protection of the island’s shores. A direct line of high resistivity, possibly a paved path leading to the northeast shore of the island, was then distinguished from the site of the defunct wooden bridge on the northwest shore of the island. Despite the difficulty of comparing the results of individual geophysical measurements in various conditions of sites, the set of results also shows several similar features concerning the character of measured anomalies in the given environment. Options application or interpretation of magnetometer and resistivity measurements along the waterlogged shores of the lake, on gravel terraces or sandy soils, can not be the same. However, the surface results of geophysical measurements undoubtedly provide information on the real state of immovable archaeological monuments and can be used in future archaeological projects of the region and/or can be compared with other already realized methods of archaeological exploration and research.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.